You need to work your wisdom/knowledge difference into a poem or sometihng. Better yet, a lyric.

"There once was a man from Nantucket..."

There once was a man from Nantucket
Who got his head stuck in a Bucket
He was clever and wise
But not very nice
So Everyone said...'Oh......let's just leave him like that'.

Sort of an unorthodox rhyming structure for a lyric, but nevertheless charming. :)

Actually, tomatoes aren't fruit at all. They're berries.

And you're not really Poetaster, you're hegel1066.

Actually, tomatoes aren't fruit at all. They're berries.

The tomato is a berry, but berries are a subset of fruit. So tomatos are indeed fruit.

I know I'm a little late to this party, but on the debate of agnostic atheist, I have to agree with Chris.

An agnostic is one who acknowledges the fact that proof of the existence (or non-existence) of a diety cannot be absolute. Therefore, and agnostic atheist is one who acknowledges this, but is inclined to believe that said diety does not exist.

With that being said, I also think that you can be an agnostic theist. This would be one who is inclined to believe in a higher being, but also acknowledges that proof of its existence cannot be known.

I don't remember in which thread Chris said John sounded like an atheist, but I tend to think he sounds more like an agnostic theist.

If Chris is an agnostic atheist - just inclined to think that there is no God, how come he is so adamant in calling the ones who have carried on the search for spirituality delusional.

Well, I didn't say that Chris was an agnostic atheist; he did. I was merely agreeing that one can be agnostic and atheist at the same time.

Well, Jeremy

I say, if you MUST label yourself - be careful what the label says, and what you come to believe about yourself because of that label.

Other people might misake the 'label' for the 'person'!!!