Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Nov 20, 2014 9:17 pm

<< Week of November 20, 2014 >>
Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday
20 Day Month

21 Day Month

22 Day Month

23 Day Month

24 Day Month

25 Day Month

26 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Ch. 4: Teeth Everywhere 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Owner
Diamond Contributor 3

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14152
Location: Florida
Thanks: 2111
Thanked: 806 times in 640 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)
Highscores: 8

Post Ch. 4: Teeth Everywhere
Ch. 4: Teeth Everywhere

Please use this thread for discussing Ch. 4: Teeth Everywhere.



Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:56 pm
Profile Email YIM WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1614
Location: Hampton, Ga
Thanks: 240
Thanked: 305 times in 232 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
If they know what goes into bones to make them super hard - hydroxyapatite- why don't they start making human bones even harder? This must go against some government regulation. I wouldn't mind going back in time and havng my DNA changed around so that my bones have a little more hydroxyapatite in them. Why can't they do this for women with weak bones?

I wish Shubin in this chapter really stressed the reptile/mammalian break. I know there probably wasn't just one break but several instances where breaks manifested themselves. Listing them would have been cool. I also know that mammal/reptile is just nomenclature war but showing the gradient would have helped me to picture how one became the other.

I like how teeth seem to be the first bones ever created - to eat! Wow. Very cool to know this. Then they moved back and became a defense (scales, shell plates)! Then I guess they moved inside and became vertebrae. Now where are they going to go? hahaha Are we going to become bone people? Awesome.

Ostracoderms and conondonts were found at about the same time period - I believe 500 million years. If this is so then how could they know which came first - teeth for eating or bones for protection?



Wed May 21, 2008 11:42 am
Profile Email YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Comandante Literario Supreme w/ Cheese

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2859
Location: Round Hill, VA
Thanks: 424
Thanked: 332 times in 253 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Camacho:
Quote:
Ostracoderms and conondonts were found at about the same time period - I believe 500 million years. If this is so then how could they know which came first - teeth for eating or bones for protection?


I believe the way they know is that conondonts only have teeth and ostracoderms have both. See the progression?


_________________
"may my mind stroll about hungry and fearless and thirsty and supple"
- e.e. cummings


Fri May 23, 2008 9:03 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Comandante Literario Supreme w/ Cheese

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2859
Location: Round Hill, VA
Thanks: 424
Thanked: 332 times in 253 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
It is incredible that what makes each specie different from each other and in fact males from females is the genetic switches. I've always been fascinated by human sexuality and gender differences. I took a class in college on human sexuality (I still have the textbook, written by the professor that taught the class, Janet Shibley Hyde) and one of the very first topics we covered was prenatal sexual differentiation. All life begins as female. The only difference between a fertilized egg that will become female and the fertilized egg that will become male is the sex chromosome. The embryos of males and females remain undifferentiated until about 7 weeks post conception. At this point all the basic structures that will become the sex organs are in place. What I find amazing is that the structures are identical in males and females, until the switches (testosterone) are activated. What this means is that for every part of the male reproduction system there is a corresponding part in the female. You can match the genitalia of males to females duct by duct and nerve ending by nerve ending. Some of the structure matches are obvious, gonads and ovaries, male glans (head of the penis) and female glans (clitorides). Some not, the tissue that becomes the shaft of the penis is the same tissue in the female that becomes the lining of the vagina (all the internal duct work and the nerve networks match as well).

Interestingly, if the cells of a male (XY) embryo are androgen (testosterone) insensitive the embryo will develop into what appears to be female fetus. People with Androgen insensitivity syndrome are genetically male, but can present externally as completely female or as hermaphrodites . Actually, even more than just female - super female. These women tend to be tall, large breasted, narrow hipped, perfect complexion (high levels of testosterone is associated with acne) and facially beautiful - think super model. These women are also infertile.


_________________
"may my mind stroll about hungry and fearless and thirsty and supple"
- e.e. cummings


Fri May 30, 2008 4:23 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4228
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1165
Thanked: 1218 times in 916 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
Saffron wrote:
Camacho:
Quote:
Ostracoderms and conondonts were found at about the same time period - I believe 500 million years. If this is so then how could they know which came first - teeth for eating or bones for protection?
I believe the way they know is that conondonts only have teeth and ostracoderms have both. See the progression?

Yes, this is what Shubin explains - conodonts were the most common fossil from that period - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conodont describes them and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chordata shows where they fit on the tree of life. They lived in the Paleozoic - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleozoic Shubin's story about how scientists thought that conodonts were organisms until they found a fossil with the soft imprint of the body showed that conodonts were the teeth, which of course survived much better as fossils than the rotting flesh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostracoderm shows where Ostracoderms fit.

Check out http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/ ... hatAre.htm for a good intro to conodonts and how to find them.

Shubin explains how teeth evolved - starting in conodonts as a new and efficient method for eating other creatures, and then gradually spreading. The amazing story is how ostracoderms used this innovation to build a skull as protection from other toothy eaters - the first skull was made of teeth! It is like the hand example - like the bone of the upper arm evolving to produce the two bones of the forearm, the group of bones at the wrist and then the fingers, the earliest teeth gradually evolved into the whole skeleton of vertebrates.

Ostracoderms are a great example of maladaption in practice. When fish with jaws evolved, the ostracoderm went into decline, because there was a new and better organism able to exploit its niches.



Fri May 30, 2008 3:32 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Comandante Literario Supreme w/ Cheese

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2859
Location: Round Hill, VA
Thanks: 424
Thanked: 332 times in 253 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Robert Tulip wrote:

Quote:
Ostracoderms are a great example of maladaption in practice. When fish with jaws evolved, the ostracoderm went into decline, because there was a new and better organism able to exploit its niches.


The fact that another organism develops an adaptation that is trumps another organism's adaptation does not render that adaptation maladaptive. Evolutions is a Red Queen's Race; organisms must be in a constant state of keeping up.


_________________
"may my mind stroll about hungry and fearless and thirsty and supple"
- e.e. cummings


Fri May 30, 2008 8:19 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1614
Location: Hampton, Ga
Thanks: 240
Thanked: 305 times in 232 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
I have a couple Ostracoderms in my back yard and if they were to see that comment they would be pretty pissed. Don't worry, I don't let them play on my computer. Lucky for you.



Fri May 30, 2008 8:27 pm
Profile Email YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4228
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1165
Thanked: 1218 times in 916 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
Saffron wrote:
Robert Tulip wrote:

Quote:
Ostracoderms are a great example of maladaption in practice. When fish with jaws evolved, the ostracoderm went into decline, because there was a new and better organism able to exploit its niches.


The fact that another organism develops an adaptation that is trumps another organism's adaptation does not render that adaptation maladaptive. Evolutions is a Red Queen's Race; organisms must be in a constant state of keeping up.


No way!! Evolution is not a Red Queen's race - Through the Looking Glass is fantasy not science. The ostracoderms did not keep up which is why they went extinct. They were lumbered with an Ordovician eating system that did not have the advantage of jaws, a constraint which rendered them unable to keep up with the Devonian Red Queens (fish). Ostracoderms were adaptive for Ordovician seas, but not for Devonian. Is the word maladaptive appropriate for this? I think so. Over a long period, maladaptive features cause extinction. I think we have a few maladaptive traits in the world today, notably the instinctive willingness to expand the economy without ensuring it is ecologically safe.

Lewis Carroll had a fine sense of the absurd, but was part of an alienated English culture, like Monty Python, in which silly ideas caught people's fancy, often with a strong satirical sub-message. Like that fine evolutionary thinker, Ms Anne Elk.



Sat May 31, 2008 12:57 am
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4228
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1165
Thanked: 1218 times in 916 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
President Camacho wrote:
I have a couple Ostracoderms in my back yard and if they were to see that comment they would be pretty pissed. Don't worry, I don't let them play on my computer. Lucky for you.
Well, given that ostracoderms have been extinct for three hundred and fifty million years we can all sleep easy. Unless some of the genetic engineers discussed in Your Inner Fish manage to resurrect them ...



Sat May 31, 2008 1:07 am
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Master Debater


Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23
Location: Baltimore, MD
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post 
Robert Tulip wrote:
Saffron wrote:
Robert Tulip wrote:

Quote:
Ostracoderms are a great example of maladaption in practice. When fish with jaws evolved, the ostracoderm went into decline, because there was a new and better organism able to exploit its niches.


The fact that another organism develops an adaptation that is trumps another organism's adaptation does not render that adaptation maladaptive. Evolutions is a Red Queen's Race; organisms must be in a constant state of keeping up.


No way!! Evolution is not a Red Queen's race - Through the Looking Glass is fantasy not science.


The Red Queen's Race is often used as a metaphor to describe evolution and the process of adjusting to a niche simply in order to stay in it (since other things are also adapting in order to better eat it or take over it's niche....).


_________________
indigo~


Sat May 31, 2008 9:19 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4228
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1165
Thanked: 1218 times in 916 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
Ostracoderms v Fish is not a Red Queens Race. Fish won. Ostracoderms did not adjust and so did not stay in the niche. Inability to adjust is maladaptive.



Sat May 31, 2008 3:50 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Comandante Literario Supreme w/ Cheese

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2859
Location: Round Hill, VA
Thanks: 424
Thanked: 332 times in 253 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Robert Tulip wrote:
Ostracoderms v Fish is not a Red Queens Race. Fish won. Ostracoderms did not adjust and so did not stay in the niche. Inability to adjust is maladaptive.


I never meant that the ostracoderms specifically were an example of the Red Queens Race. What I was trying to get at is traits are selected by natural selection and that all ecosystem are in a constant state of change, albeit very slow, driven by the need to keep up. There is no space for maladaption in the theory of evolution. Maladatption means that something works counter to survival. Having a bony skull is still better than not having one. It's just not as good when someone else comes along that can bite through it.


_________________
"may my mind stroll about hungry and fearless and thirsty and supple"
- e.e. cummings


Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:43 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4228
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1165
Thanked: 1218 times in 916 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
But Saffron, you seemed to use ostracoderms as an example of a Red Queens Race in arguing against the existence of maladaption, when you said, in response to my comment about ostracoderms "The fact that another organism develops an adaptation that trumps another organism's adaptation does not render that adaptation maladaptive. Evolution is a Red Queen's Race; organisms must be in a constant state of keeping up."

An interesting thing about Shubin is his description of general laws in evolution. Your comment implies that the Red Queen Race is such a general law, that organisms inevitably adapt to stay competitive. In fact this is not the case. There are often winners and losers. Humanity is now in a Red Queens Race against microbes, having to run faster to stay even. However, if a superbug evolves that causes the extinction of humanity, the race will be over.

The point about ostracoderms is that they did have a trait (lack of a jaw) which worked counter to their survival, which is why they were maladaptive and went extinct.



Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:15 pm
Profile Email WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:


BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books

Poll

Yes  33%  [2]
No  50%  [3]
Depends on whether or not I'm the victim.  16%  [1]
Total votes: 6

Books by New Authors


Top Posters

Of all time: Chris OConnor (14152), Interbane (5561), DWill (4961), stahrwe (4610), Robert Tulip (4228), Mr. Pessimistic (3542), johnson1010 (3315), geo (3243), ant (3030), Penelope (2969), Saffron (2859), Suzanne (2473), Frank 013 (2021), Dissident Heart (1796), bleachededen (1680), President Camacho (1614), Ophelia (1543), Dexter (1441), tat tvam asi (1298), youkrst (1287)

Of the last 24 hrs: Movie Nerd (24), lehelvandor (19), ant (10), Interbane (8), Gnostic Bishop (6), TheWizard (4), Chris OConnor (4), Flann 5 (3), Dexter (3), Robert Tulip (2), geo (2), fcrimi (1), whathappened (1), Taylor (1), David Rain (1), JJ_Co (1)




BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Atheist Mind, Humanist Heart - by Lex Bayer and John FigdorSense and Goodness Without God - by Richard CarrierFrankenstein - by Mary ShelleyThe Big Questions - by Simon BlackburnScience Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2014. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank