| BookTalk.org News |
| • A new forum has been created exclusively for discussing poetry! |
| • We now have a VIDEOS page featuring videos of our authors giving lectures, talks, interviews or engaged in debates. You'll find the link in the top green navigation bar. |
| • Guy P. Harrison, author of "50 reasons people give for believing in a god," has accepted our invitation to either a live chat session or an email interview! |
| Featured Videos |
Henry David Thoreau
& Walden Pond

Richard Dawkins The God Delusion

More Videos
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
| Donate & Support BookTalk.org |
Please support our free community by making a credit card donation through our secure PayPal account. We appreciate and depend on the generosity of our members. Thank you! •
See who supports us
|
|
| Author |
Message |
sqwark Eligible to vote!
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 15
Gender: 
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 2:42 pm Post subject: Sqwark!com
|
|
|
Hi. I really like your site. I am doing something similar with sqwark.com, which has just become operational in the last few days. I am especially interested in Richard Dawkins' forthcoming appearance - that was quite a coup! I'll be staying tuned for it.
In the meantime, this is me:
Sqwark! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NaddiaAoC  Sophomore Bronze Contributor

Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 250
Gender: 
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 9:28 pm Post subject: Re: Sqwark!com
|
|
|
Squark,
Welcome to BookTalk. I hope that you're able to read Unweaving the Rainbow and participate in the discussions on the forum.
Cheryl |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy1952  Doctorate Bronze Contributor

Joined: 27 Oct 2002
Posts: 594
Gender: 
Location: Saint Louis
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2003 11:33 pm Post subject: Re: Sqwark!com
|
|
|
Epigenetics Of course, being me, when I visited your site I jumped immediately to the "science" link. I find the language of the genetics discussion exceedingly odd – "This staunch dogma is held as scientific fact by the mainstream biological establishment". As anyone with dealings with real science and real scientists knows, "dogma" is the farthest thing from how science operates; so such pugnacious language causes me to question the motivations of one who writes that way.
"Recent findings out of molecular genetics however, are placing this hypothesis under increasing strain." Actually, they are not. The reason that alternatives to random mutation are summarily dismissed is that no plausible mechanism has ever been proposed for them. I say, if you have a hypothesis concerning mechanism, then state it up front and loose the argumentative tone. If not, the rational thing is to fit new observations into known mechanisms. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris OConnor  Rhodes Scholar BookTalk.org Owner

Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 6752
Gender: 
Location: Florida

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy1952  Doctorate Bronze Contributor

Joined: 27 Oct 2002
Posts: 594
Gender: 
Location: Saint Louis
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 2:23 pm Post subject: Re: Sqwark!com
|
|
|
| We can still argue/discuss/promote/denigrate his material though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|