You are browsing the forum as a guest. Please log in or register to access additional features.
Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ABOUT BOOKS VIDEOS TRANSCRIPTS LINKS BLOGS DONATE CONTACT  

     Log in   Register 


BookTalk.org News
Have you ordered your copy of our next books?

Links & Resources

Community Rules & Tips
For Authors & Publishers
Link to our old forum
Our Amazon.com Statistics
Book Suggestions
Donations to BookTalk.org
BookTalk Forum Statistics
Games 170 FREE Games


Featured Videos

Robert Burton
"On Being Certain"


Robert Burton - On Being Certain

More Videos

Author Interviews


Featured Member Blogs

Ophelia's Blog
Lawrence's Blog
Penelope's Blog
Frank 013's Blog

- View all member Blogs
- See the latest Blog posts


Chat Room

Enter the BookTalk.org Chat Room

Enter our Chat Room

Donate to BookTalk.org

Please support BookTalk.org by making a small donation today!

Who supports us?


Related Links

Show us where you live!
BookTalk.org Member Map

Display Pagerank


Wicked: what's a novel?


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BookTalk.org Forum Index -> Additional Fiction Book Discussions
Author Message
Ophelia Ophelia has been starred
Embodiment of Reason
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar



Joined: 25 Nov 2007

Posts: 1272
Gender: Female
Location: France
ee.gif



PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:43 pm    Post subject: Wicked: what's a novel? Reply with quote
Quote:
Constance wrote:

Quote:
In pretty much all of my literature classes in high school and college we paralleled novels to current life and we always had to learn a little about the time period in which a book was written when we studied it. So I tend to look at books this way when I read them - I am a product of my education


I'll go on with my thoughts about Wicked as a novel , and especially as triggered by what Constance and Tammy wrote.

Yes, we are a product of our educations, and the difference is not a matter of things being antithetical, but a matter of placing the emphasis on different things.

I learnt a lot about my education by realizing what it was NOT at the University of Cape Town and then later in San Diego.
So what did I learn at university?

I'll sum up the situations in two ways, so take your pick:

1- It's amazing how much I have forgotten. I remember the titles of many books... but the content of very few. Sad

2- Shall we decide that... culture is what is left when you've forgotten most of what you ever learnt? Confused



Next, you two ladies have the following advantages over me:

a- went to university recently, as opposed to the early eighties, so it's all fresh in your minds.

b- The French school system in those days, though suffering no self doubts and not being given to causing confusion, explained nothing in its methods.
I would not try it with twenty first century high school students, but it worked then.

This leads me to the following examples and comments.

Yesterday, by chance, I came to read a posting by an American reader somewhere, who was very capably explaining what analyzing a novel was. Sadly, I lost the page, but I remember this.
In her first three essential questions to ask was:

Does this reflect reality?

And I thought "That's definitely NOT what I learnt to ask!"

So since yesterday I've been puzzling about what questions I learnt to ask, and I don't know exactly.

Still, one observation: if "Does this reflect reality?" was turned to "What does this tell us about the human condition?", I'd feel more comfortable.

Also I have a suggestion about why the above question would not have cropped up.
French schools and universities are always packed, nobody needs to worry about next year's enrolment figures and our professors had a knack for choosing the really serious stuff : Milton, The Spire by William Golding, or D H Lawrence (you have to enter his wordview , he wrote those Phoenix I and Phoenix II books to explain it...) : try leading a class discussion relating to anybody's experience after those...

But still, if the book had lent itself to other types of discussion, for example in the French lit class in high school, they would not have been explored, because nobody would have thought of them.


OK, next, I thought I quite liked this trip on Memory Lane and I might look up what the web had to say about "What is fiction?".

I'll give one good site in my next postings, but first I'll mention that a few sites started with life-saving tips like:

"First of all, you must ask yourselves who the main character is."
Surprised
Back to top
Constance963 Constance963 has been starred
Intern

Avatar



Joined: 20 Nov 2007

Posts: 165
Gender: Female

us.gif



PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Maybe the way we are taught is a cultural difference. Based on the other American's posting you referenced it sounds like that may just be what American teachers ask about a book. I've been out of college for about 7 years or so now and I have already forgotten quite a bit, sadly - math being the majority of my forgetting, or maybe selective forgetting Laughing

I have kept a lot of my notes from my classes so out of curiosity I want to take a look through the ones from my literature classes and see some of the questions I jotted down. I specifically remember a lot of direct references to real life in relation to Puritan writings like the Scarlet Letter. I had to read that book 3 or 4 times in school so that one stands out in particular.

I remember being asked what certain themes are in a book and relating characters and events back to those themes, who the antagonist and protagonist were, and what ideas the author might be trying to get across in the novel.
Back to top
Ophelia Ophelia has been starred
Embodiment of Reason
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar



Joined: 25 Nov 2007

Posts: 1272
Gender: Female
Location: France
ee.gif



PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
I have kept a lot of my notes from my classes so out of curiosity I want to take a look through the ones from my literature classes and see some of the questions I jotted down. I specifically remember a lot of direct references to real life in relation to Puritan writings like the Scarlet Letter. I had to read that book 3 or 4 times in school so that one stands out in particular.


It's amazing how some books or themes seem to follow you! Smile

I did Hamlet three times, each time in depth, and there was still a lot to learn I never got bored and I saw the play at least 6 times after that.

Then, there 's the other sort. I love history, and it seems that every person who writes a curriculum here wants you to study the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century, so it started in history and French lit in high school, and then English 19th century every year they could fit it in.
And really, it's one of the easiest themes there are, I had got the facts the very first time!


Actually, I still don't know whether there are differences between two ways of looking at fiction.

I'll post the one site I found that was detailed, and most thing are straight forward and as i would expect them to be.

First I have a short version of it with my commentaries between brackets.
Back to top
Ophelia Ophelia has been starred
Embodiment of Reason
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar



Joined: 25 Nov 2007

Posts: 1272
Gender: Female
Location: France
ee.gif



PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Fiction* http://www.criticalreading.com/fiction.htm

[* Here is one difference perhaps: the word “fiction” exists in French but we did not use it.
We talked about “literature” and “novels”.

- Booktalk divides reading into fiction and non-fiction (useful distinction).
I suppose bookshops may use that distinction too?

In France the one big bookshop , FNAC, goes into subcategories immediately, such as: French literature, foreign literature, history...

- Is “fiction” more a word of the English language?
- Is it a term which is used recently to include recreational reading (and now we sometimes hear of “literary fiction”) ? ]


Fiction: The Story And The Moral
Fiction is subjective and evocative. It is "made up," and indirect in its communication.*

[* This is perhaps what had attracted my attention in Wicked: did Maguire perhaps give those quotations in too direct a way, that could be then then taken straight out of the novel and discussed in the real world without the context of the novel?
I only checked one example, about hot anger and cold anger, and, no, author not guilty there (!), it had been brought about very naturally in the flow of the dialogue.]


A work of fiction may evoke:
• the thrill of imagining impossible or unavailable experiences
• intrigue with playing out "what if" or" if only" scenarios
• feelings and perceptions of another historical period, or simply observations on the human condition

We thus read fiction not to gain new information so much as to experience the ideas and feelings a story inspires within us.

Readers have different expectations from fiction and nonfiction. Proof is a major issue with nonfiction; emotional involvement is a major issue with fiction.* We expect a story (fiction) to grab us, an essay (nonfiction) to convince us. We will suspend belief when reading a romance novel or science fiction, but demand reason and evidence from nonfiction.
[* True in this context, but I think my professors, if asked, might have said that emotional involvement was associated with poetry, and we probably conducted lit class a little like philosophy classes).


Fiction is, by definition, subjective. A novel, story, drama, or poem is the expression of an author's imagination. The characters and situations are "made up." Readers expect fiction to reflect the real world; they do not expect it to portray the real world.*

[* Could there be something in this?]

.
Fiction is Evocative: Images and Symbols
Fiction conveys meaning indirectly (other than, of course, through morals at the ends of fables*).

[ * Here we have a problem. I’m thinking of novels (whereas the author writes about fiction, and precisely novels would be be very different from fables, maxims, etc..]


With fiction, the meaning is dependant on the perceptions, imagination, and feelings of the reader. In both cases, however, we demand that an interpretation be based on evidence on the page. And in both cases, part of understanding is understanding one's own interests, values, and desires and how they affect what one looks for and how one thinks about what one finds.

Analyzing and Interpreting Fiction: Perspectives

Of the three elements exemined here (content, language, and structure), language is the least important, *although hardly insignificant, element of a story.

[* The writer is very assertive here.
That’s not the impression I got from my student days.

For now, I don’t feel a need to choose between the three, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some literary critics had been at each other’s throats for decades about this.
My professors seemed to think “characters” were suspicious, and I read something by a famous author (was it Somerset Maugham?) saying that “plot” should be done away with!
]

Language plays a role predominantly in terms of the use of symbolism and projecting an overall tone. We might think of this as part of the mental setting in which the action takes place. Analyzing The Scarlet Letter, we might note how language is used to indicate the lightness of the scene of Hester and her daughter Pearl in contrast to the darkness of the scene in which Hester confronts Reverend Dimmesdale. Language also can play a major role in terms of accents or dialects, as in Twain's Huckleberry Finn.
Back to top
Ophelia Ophelia has been starred
Embodiment of Reason
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar



Joined: 25 Nov 2007

Posts: 1272
Gender: Female
Location: France
ee.gif



PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:26 am    Post subject: Showing, not telling. Reply with quote
I often remark I find Wicked strange.

For example, after introducing Gawnette's children, we expected to read more about Elphaba's childhood, but the author decided to take us straight to university.

It seems we might have some flashbacks at the end of the book.

And here is an example of writing that amuses me:

p 371: Nanny: Do you remember that pair of shoes that Frex had decorated for her (Nasserose)?
"The beautiful shoes! Her father's sign of devotion to his second daughter, his desire to accentuate her beauty and draw attention away from he deformity."

So, how is this for introducing the theme of the shoes and kindly giving us the key to everything within in the next sentence? Smile
Back to top
Display replies from:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BookTalk.org Forum Index -> Additional Fiction Book Discussions  
Page 1 of 1


 
Recent Topics
» Ch. 4: The Classification of Mental States
by Saffron on Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:04 pm

» Ch. 13: Faith
by DWill on Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:51 pm

» Interview with Robert Burton
by Lawrence on Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:28 pm

» Control.
by Ophelia on Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:40 pm

» Can a person enter a war as an act of cowardice?
by imnosalinger on Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:22 pm

» Hello hello
by Ophelia on Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:59 pm

» Hello all!
by imnosalinger on Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:41 pm

» Sarah Palin: Good, Bad or just the wrong choice?
by imnosalinger on Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:16 am

» Wow...even I feel bad for McCain
by Ophelia on Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:14 am

» About the parking poll and handicapped spots.
by Penelope on Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:17 am




BookTalk.org Suggests


With Pythons & Head-Hunters in Borneo: The Quest for Mount Tiban by Brian Row McNamee

In a Time of War: The Proud and Perilous Journey of West Point' Class of 2002 by Bill Murphy Jr.

Imagine No Superstition: The Power to Enjoy Life With No Guilt, No Shame, No Blame by Stephen Frederick

Scheisshaus Luck: Surviving the Unspeakable in Auschwitz and Dora by Pierre Berg with Brian Brock

Beyond Reasonable Doubt by Geoff J. Henley

Additional Book Suggestions


Related Links

Poll
Do you think choosing Sarah Palin was a mistake for McCain?

Yes. She is way too inexperienced to potentially serve as President [9]
Yes, she may be inexperienced, but she has charm...and thats what counts. [0]
She has enough appeal to the masses to make her choice acceptable. [0]
No. She lives next to Russia, so has enough experience for me. [0]
Is it too late to get Tina Fey on the ticket? [2]
I think she was an excellent choice. [1]

You must login to vote


BookTalk.org is a book discussion group, also known as a reading group or book club. We read and talk about non-fiction books, as a group. Live author chats where book group members can interact with and interview authors are common. We often give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys booktalk.  Booktalk is a free online reading group that features quality book reviews, resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. Non-fiction chat, book forum, literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today. Suggest nonfiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to plug their books or ask for an author chat or interview.

MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEABOUTBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSLINKSBLOGSFAQDONATECONTACT

BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
The Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power: The End of American ExceptionalismLolitaOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year-History of the Human Body by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals by Michael PollanI, Claudius : From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born 10 B.C., Murdered and Deified A.D. 54 by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? The Search for the Best Way to Live by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies: The Next Stage of History by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right by Al FrankenThe Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From the Big Bang To the 21st Century by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition into the Forces of Nature by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES
Baloney Detection KitBanned Book ListBook OrdersMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2008. All rights reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca