| BookTalk.org News |
| • Thank you breakwill! I received your very generous donation and really appreciate the support! |
| • Someone donated $50 through our new Amazon.com Honor System (see the left sidebar), but I didn't get an email letting me know who it was. Was it YOU? Let me know please! |
| • Thank you Ophelia!!! Your donation is MUCH appreciated! |
| • Regular casual chats are back on the menu! Check out the calendar for the schedule. |
| Featured Videos |
BREAKING NEWS

Andrew Bacevich
"The Limits of Power"

More Videos
|
| Amazon Honor System |
|
| Donate to BookTalk.org |
Please support BookTalk.org by making a small donation today!
•
Who supports us?
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Ophelia  Embodiment of Reason Gold Contributor


Usergroups: None
Joined: 25 Nov 2007

Posts: 1395
Thanks Given: 2 Received: 8 in 8 Posts
Gender: 
Location: France

|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:41 am Post subject: What sort of readers read Wicked?
|
|
|
Hello, Wicked readers, I'm back on track reading Maguire's book, and this time I mean to proceed.
I'll write some of the questions I'm asking myself as I read.
This book is very unusual, and I am trying to picture the kind of reader that would be attracted to it.
Of course, some would be the type that belong to a group and like to discuss books.
Others would read it because they've seen the old films or the musical.
Yet there is a wealth of unusual vocabulary, and some complex sentence structures, that you do not always associate with bestsellers.
So I'll keep this in mind as I read: who are the other readers in the real world?
Actually, here's an extract from the New York Times which partly answers my question:
“Son of a Witch,” a sequel to “Wicked,” spent 14 weeks on the New York Times best-seller list. Although “Wicked” stayed there for 26 weeks, it didn’t arrive until 10 years after its publication. In one interview, Maguire joked that the musical was “a $14 million advertising campaign for the book.” In fact, when the novel was published in 1995, he gave a reading in Chicago for which seven people showed up." *
Next, Carly's reference to audio books has been very useful for me: I'm used to reading only books I feel attracted to but Wicked is one of those books I wanted to be able to discuss but could not manage to read as my mind kept wandering.
Now I've started listening and reading at the same time, it's a new experience for me and I'm enjoying it.
An added bonus for someone like me is that I hear some lovely English from an educated voice: usually the only type of English I hear is from television.
*http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/magazine/11maguire.t.html?pagewante d=3&_r=1[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Constance963  Intern

Usergroups: None
Joined: 20 Nov 2007

Posts: 165
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 

|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi Ophelia,
I am mainly a general fiction reader. I picked up Wicked because I saw the musical and it prompted me to read the original story that the show was adapted from. I had read one of Gregory Maguire's previous books, Lost, so I was at least a little familiarized with his writing style which I have to admit had put me off at first. I started and quit reading Lost 3 times before I finally really got into it on the 4th reading and I enjoyed it once I did. When I started to read Wicked, I had a feeling that it would be the same so I stuck with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theomanic  I can enter The Chamber Bronze Contributor


Usergroups: None
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 57
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
Location: Toronto, ON

|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:36 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I wanted to read Wicked because I have a strong attraction to fairy tale type stories, and re-tellings of fairy tales. I think that's part of the reason I like magic realism as a genre, and the whole idea of modern day fairy tales.
Personally I didn't end up being a huge fan of Wicked. I felt for a book that size, regardless of subject matter, the character development was amazingly lacking. I don't think the book would ever have made a splash without the musical because I don't think it's very high quality. However, quality doesn't a bestseller make! (Thinks about a certain D. Brown....) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|