| BookTalk.org News |
| • Thank you breakwill! I received your very generous donation and really appreciate the support! |
| • Someone donated $50 through our new Amazon.com Honor System (see the left sidebar), but I didn't get an email letting me know who it was. Was it YOU? Let me know please! |
| • The Secret Garden has won the Dec. 2008 Jan. 2009 Fiction book poll! |
| • Thank you Ophelia!!! Your donation is MUCH appreciated! |
| • 5 members are now enjoying the new "Email Digests" feature. Click on the digests link on the right at the top of every page to learn more. This is a great feature for keeping updated on forum activity. |
| • Regular casual chats are back on the menu! Check out the calendar for the schedule. |
| Featured Videos |
BREAKING NEWS

Andrew Bacevich
"The Limits of Power"

More Videos
|
| Amazon Honor System |
|
| Donate to BookTalk.org |
Please support BookTalk.org by making a small donation today!
•
Who supports us?
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
coberst
Usergroups: None
Joined: 04 Dec 2007

Posts: 21
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:22 am Post subject: Citizen becomes Cipher
|
|
|
Citizen becomes Cipher
Rugged individualism might be an appropriate expression for all the creatures in the world, with one exception. Humans have, in the last few hundred years, moved from being rugged individuals to our present state in which we have fashioned an alien environment in which we have become chess pieces or ciphers. We have invented the Artificial Kingdom where, as Simone Weil once noted, “it is the thing that thinks and the man who is reduced to the state of the thing”.
I think that we, women and men, have become chess pieces. We have become objects to be manipulated by the market and the corporation. We spend our days like the chess piece; we have a quantified value and are placed on the board and used as desired by some one who may be a real person. The real person has still the human characteristics of creativity, spontaneity, improvisation, spontaneously reactive, discontinuous, a mosaic more than syntax or cipher. Just what we find is missing when using the telephone to contact someone out there.
In an effort to understand where we are now it might help to start back in time and move forward. In frontier days each person was very much an individual. Rugged individualism was a popular expression. Each man and woman was a jack-of-all-trades and master of none. Each husband and wife was a team that together could and had to do everything that was needed.
In early America we were an agricultural economy. Most families were farm families we were all rugged individualist. The farmer was very much the jack-of-all-trades and the master of his or her domain.
As we move forward in time we see this team become a man working in a factory or office and the woman was at home raising the children and maintaining the day to day necessities for all family members. She washed, cleaned, shopped, sewed, and was still much of a rugged individual. Slowly the man became a specialized worker in a clockwork factory or office.
Moving forward in history we arrive at the present moment where not only is the man working in the factory or office but the woman joins him there also.
When we examine the factory or office workspace we find a very different occupation for the man and woman than the rugged individualism of emerging history of human evolution. We no longer are masters of our own domain but are ciphers in a clockwork that functions upon modern economic principles.
A pertinent example of this mode of commodification is how we have converted what was political economics into the modern economics. Political economy is the study of social relations. It is the study of culture. Political economy focuses upon the problem of how to regulate industrialization within the context of a healthy society, it worries about the problems of labor within a context of the laborer as an end and not a commodity—an object of commerce.
Economics, however, in its modern form, has replaced political economics. Economics has removed the pesky concern about labor as being human and has replaced labor as being a commodity—an object of commerce. Modern economics is now the study of scarcity, prices, and resource allocation. Economics has legislated that labor, as an end, is no longer a legitimate domain of knowledge for economic consideration. In doing so, over time, society has become ignorant of such concerns. Our culture has replaced concern about humans as ends with humans as means to some other end.
In the rugged individualist mode of living the individual was creative and master even though the domain of mastery was small. An individual’s personality is dramatically affected. Labor has become an abstract quantity and calculated into the commodity produced. We are the only creatures who have completely removed our self from what we were evolved to be. We are the only creatures removed from our grounding in an organic world. We came from a long ancestry of rugged individualist and now reside in the Artificial Kingdom. To what end only time will tell.
Do you feel like a cipher in our culture? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MadArchitect
Usergroups: None
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
   
Posts: 2609
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
Location: decentralized

|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: Re: Citizen becomes Cipher
|
|
|
| coberst wrote: |
| In frontier days each person was very much an individual. Rugged individualism was a popular expression. Each man and woman was a jack-of-all-trades and master of none. Each husband and wife was a team that together could and had to do everything that was needed. |
Welcome aboard, coberst (can I call you Conner?). That's an impressive first post. I'll be interested to see what ideas you bring to the table.
While I recognize the ideal that you're pointing to in the quoted text, and agree that it was an ideal widely espoused on the American frontier, I think it's dangerous to assume that people lived up to it with any regularity. Francis Jennings, for example, has compellingly argued that European frontiersmen in the New World would have been thoroughly incapable of establishing a foothold on the continent had they not found ready collaborators in the indigenous societies. Richard Hofstadter also discusses the yeoman ideal at length, and from reading his books and other sources, I've come to think it highly unlikely that many people, if any at all, truly managed to be self-sufficient during the frontier expansion.
Which is not, of course, to say that we aren't even further removed from the ideal than they were. But it also seems that some pockets of flexibility have opened up here and there. Some scholars have suggested that the ease and readiness with which the younger adult generations transition from one job to the next, not only within a given field but across fields, constitutes a sort of economic freedom that hasn't been evidence in the United States since the 19th century. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coberst
Usergroups: None
Joined: 04 Dec 2007

Posts: 21
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:38 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Mad...
I must disappoint you by admitting that the c stands for Chuck. However thanks for the welcome.
Let’s try to empathize with the frontier family who is a farmer or small merchant. Such a family must face alone all the tsunamis of everyday existence without help from anyone other than a few neighbors. Such a family has no “safety net” of any kind. There is no insurance, pension, social security, hospital, and no hardware store with all the technology to help when things go wrong. Such a family must reconstruct reality constantly when faced with a reality that they are unprepared for. Such a family must constantly recreate a new reality as reality constantly shakes the foundation of their understanding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|