Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:54 am

<< Week of September 26, 2016 >>
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
26 Day Month

27 Day Month

28 Day Month

29 Day Month

30 Day Month

1 Day Month

2 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
A Bright Meme 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1608
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Thanks: 44
Thanked: 507 times in 397 posts
Gender: Male

Post A Bright Meme
Here's an article by Dawkins, starting a meme, finding a new label...

books.guardian.co.uk/revi...12,00.html




Thu Jun 26, 2003 4:56 pm
Profile WWW


Post Re: A Bright Meme
I haven't gotten the chance to read the whole article, but at first glance it seems like a horrible idea. Maybe I'm missing a crucial point.




Fri Jun 27, 2003 1:35 am
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1608
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Thanks: 44
Thanked: 507 times in 397 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: A Bright Meme
I think it's a good idea, but he did not choose le bon mot (ie the right word). I understand the desire to replace "atheist", sort of a negative term with a postive term. However, "I'm a bright" sounds way too much like "I'm smarter than you are" to be accepted by the general population. I don't think it will work, but it could be interesting to see if this meme catches on at all...

Other possibilities?
naturalist -- ooops, are you a nudist?
momentist -- don't believe in afterlife
factualist -- ?

Naw, he's going for something a little more poetic, perhaps something from fantasy literature or role-playing gaming (heheheeeeeee! how's that for playing to an audience?) would work. :hat




Fri Jun 27, 2003 8:38 pm
Profile WWW


Post Re: A Bright Meme
Personally, I think we already have the appropriate term: Freethinker. I honestly don't know how you could improve upon that.

Still haven't read all the article...soon...soon...




Sat Jun 28, 2003 9:55 pm
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Gaining experience


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 76
Location: Bellingham, WA
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: A Bright Meme
;)

I'm all for it and I sighned on. I don't mind the opponents judging that we imply greater intelligence. I know from the article, we are suppose to counter that assumption and assume a stance of modesty. Then again, what does gay have to do with homosexuality? Yet it has succeeded in giving the homosexual community political clout. Even though the community now identifies gays as a group to disapprove, the unconscious mind cannot help but make positive connotations with the word gay (happy, giddy, etc.)

The same will happen with the Brights. They will eventually figure that means something like atheist, the subconscious will think instead of intelligent, insightful, etc.

I think it is worth a try! We need some political clout and a very broad umbrella to cover all who lead their lives as if there is no supernatural world to appeal to.

Meme Wars
Monty Vonn
montyquest@aol.com




Sun Jun 29, 2003 7:39 pm
Profile


Post Re: A Bright Meme
The argument that the homosexual political movement is indebted to the label 'gay' is most tenuous. Even if it were granted, it is hardly justification the abandonment of the much more sterile term atheist. Furthermore, I think that if you consult the popular culture, you will discover that, contrary to feelings of happiness and giddyness, the term 'gay' has become quite stigmatized and conjurs up images of debauchery, effeminancy, amorality, lasciviousness, ineffectuality, and all the other manner of prejudice in the minds of those the movement seeks to persuade, even to the point where the term has fallen into disuse. The political success owes less to the connotative vagaries of the term and its power of suggestion, than to the ability of a single inclusive name to induce unification and constituent organization.

If political influence is what you seek, perhaps the terms atheist and freethinker are ill-equiped for the task, having not the potency to draw all manner of disbelievers into a single fold. Yet it seems to me that 'Bright' offers no better solution and worse, could promote division within and without the ranks, by virtue of the very implications inhering in the name. The suggestion of intellectual superiority is no small matter and would engender feelings of hostility rather than attractiveness among the opposition. The 'gay' political movement was well aware of this and chose a politically inclusive rather than exclusive label. 'Bright' fails on this account, ever so miserably.

I'm happy with atheism as an intellectual movement. As such, it is free from the political manuevering and manipulations, and is beholden to none other than reason herself. Nevertheless, I recognize the need for political organization and, not wishing to malign the good name of freethinker, I concur that there is need for a political label through which an atheistic political agenda could be pursued. For this purpose, bright is ridiculously impoverished and impotent for reasons explained above. The appropriate term must be politically inert, and it must be socially inclusive. I leave its conception to you.




Mon Jun 30, 2003 2:19 am
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Gaining experience


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 76
Location: Bellingham, WA
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: A Bright Meme
The reason I do not accept the term "Atheism" is because the term has no meaning in absense to the word "Theism". This gives the word "Theism" primacy, which I do not wish to do. I believe the prime starting position is no position at all. Theism came later as a position and must prove itself to gain legitamacy. Having no position requires no proof and is the beginning point. I believe it is also the superior position. It requires no proof or defence.

Humanism is a runner up. It too is misinterpreted as humans being superior to all other considerations, instead of being interpreted as modesty, that we can only know the cosmos through our limited species-specific human senses and faculty.

Humanism is also a political movement, that many non-supernaturalist may not desire, agree or follow. So I believe we should continue to search for a term that gives a broader coverage for a unified movement.

I, for one, am willing to give "The Brights" a try. Although having a naturalistic view on the world does not require high intelligence, the correlation is so abundently clear that it is an accurate adjective for naturalists. I believe others who disagree with us would also consider most people they know that fit in this category as brighter than the everyday norm. But they pridefully say "You cannot think your way to heaven. It takes the faith of a child."

Meme Wars
Monty Vonn
montyquest@aol.com




Mon Jun 30, 2003 12:27 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

BookTalk.org Newsletter 

Announcements 

• Resources related to Uncle Tom's Cabin
Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:28 pm



Site Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

Featured Books

Books by New Authors


*

FACTS is a select group of active BookTalk.org members passionate about promoting Freethought, Atheism, Critical Thinking and Science.

Apply to join FACTS
See who else is in FACTS







BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.



Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2016. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank