| BookTalk.org News |
| Only 4 members are currently signed up to receive email digests. Click on the digests link on the right at the top of every page to learn more. This is a great feature for keeping updated on forum activity. |
| Regular casual chats are back on the menu! Check out the calendar for the schedule. |
| Featured Videos |
Dan Barker
author of "Godless"
talks about his deconversion

Andrew Bacevich
"The Limits of Power"

More Videos
|
| Amazon Honor System |
|
| Donate to BookTalk.org |
Please support BookTalk.org by making a small donation today!
•
Who supports us?
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jeremy1952  Doctorate Bronze Contributor

Usergroups: None
Joined: 27 Oct 2002
     
Posts: 583
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
Location: Saint Louis
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2003 6:30 pm Post subject: One man, many women. Right?
|
|
|
C'mon guys, does everyone agree that polygamy would be a great deal for women and a lousy deal for men... and that's why men have outlawed it, not, as they purport, to protect women?Quote: pp 186: Incidentally, the polygyny threshold leads me to ask the question In whose interest is it that polygamy be outlawed in our society? We automatically assume it is in the interest of women. But consider; it would presumably be illegal, as it is now, for people to be forced to marry against their will, so second wives would be choosing their lot voluntarily. A woman who wants a career would surely find a mιnage ΰ trois more, not less, convenient; she would have two partners to help share the chores of child care. As a Mormon lawyer put it recently, there are "compelling social reasons" that make polygamy "attractive to the modern career woman." But think of the effect on men. If many women chose to be second wives of rich men rather than first wives of poor men, there would be a shortage of unmarried women, and many men would be forced to remain unhappily celibate. Far from being laws to protect women, antipolygamy statutes may really do more to protect men.
Science is neither a philosophy nor a belief system. It is a combination of mental operations that has become increasingly the habit of educated peoples, a culture of illuminations hit upon by a fortunate turn of history that yielded the most effective way of learning about the real world ever conceived. E.O.Wilson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PeterDF  Freshman
Usergroups: None
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
    
Posts: 214
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 7:17 pm Post subject: Re: One man, many women. Right?
|
|
|
I suppose the flaw in this argument would be that the men in charge - the ones who make the laws - would be the ones with the harem. Its the poor serfs and underlings that would have to do without wives - and who cares about them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swamy Maximus Almost a regular
Usergroups: None
Joined: 01 Oct 2005
  
Posts: 38
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:56 pm Post subject: Re: One man, many women. Right?
|
|
|
| Robert Wright, in his excellent book The Moral Animal gives a clear explanation for why it would be bad for men as a group |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|