| BookTalk.org News |
| • Thank you breakwill! I received your very generous donation and really appreciate the support! |
| • Someone donated $50 through our new Amazon.com Honor System (see the left sidebar), but I didn't get an email letting me know who it was. Was it YOU? Let me know please! |
| • The Secret Garden has won the Dec. 2008 Jan. 2009 Fiction book poll! |
| • Thank you Ophelia!!! Your donation is MUCH appreciated! |
| • 5 members are now enjoying the new "Email Digests" feature. Click on the digests link on the right at the top of every page to learn more. This is a great feature for keeping updated on forum activity. |
| • Regular casual chats are back on the menu! Check out the calendar for the schedule. |
| Featured Videos |
BREAKING NEWS

Andrew Bacevich
"The Limits of Power"

More Videos
|
| Amazon Honor System |
|
| Donate to BookTalk.org |
Please support BookTalk.org by making a small donation today!
•
Who supports us?
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Ken Hemingway Intern
Usergroups: None
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
  
Posts: 188
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:32 pm Post subject: Re: What causes gravity?
|
|
|
Rellimlk
Thanks for the summary. I think for this to begin to jell I'd need answers to two further questions.
1. How does exchange of particles cause force in the first place? I think it has something to do with the momentum of the exchanged particle (somehow negative for attractive forces), but this is puzzling when the exchanged particle has no mass (as with the photon).
2. How doe the particle exchange theory fit in with the warped space-time theory fo General Relativity? Einstein spent half his life looking for a unification of electromagnetism and gravity with no success. Have the recent advances cast any light on this question? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rellimlk Newbie
Usergroups: None
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
   
Posts: 4
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:57 pm Post subject: Re: What causes gravity?
|
|
|
Quote: Einstein spent half his life looking for a unification of electromagnetism and gravity with no success. Have the recent advances cast any light on this question?
String theory and M-Theory (a meta-theory that takes different versions of string theory that seem to conflict and reveals a common substructure) is currently the the widest held (perhaps only) theory that unifies gravity with the other 3 forces. The messenger particles for the other 3 forces, by the way, have been experimentally verified (if I remember correctly) in atom smashing.
Quote: How doe the particle exchange theory fit in with the warped space-time theory fo General Relativity?
I don't have a good answer to that...except that the gravitational field works the same way as any other force field (electromagnetic, for example). Gravitons are simply the smallest, fundamental component. It is almost a misnomer to call them particles--it is more like a packet of force. In some ways, matter PARTICLES with a mass should also be understood to be fields just like forces--since they are really just energy vibrations. But we are very accustomed to thinking in terms of tiny bits of solid stuff that things don't get phrased that way. It is tied up with the E=mc2 which describes the interchangeability of energy and mass.
Quote: 1. How does exchange of particles cause force in the first place? I think it has something to do with the momentum of the exchanged particle (somehow negative for attractive forces), but this is puzzling when the exchanged particle has no mass (as with the photon).
You mention mass as though for something to exist physically (that is have physical effects on things)it has to have mass. This is a very fundamental assumption that can be difficult to get beyond...it is so integral to our experience of the world. When we experience the mass of an object we experience its resistance to being moved (accelerated). But accelerated in relation to what? And what is it that makes a thing need to stay in the same state? What gives a thing MASS?
One answer provided is what they call the Higgs Ocean...a universal force field that is left over from the big bang. All the different vibrating strings behave differently when passing through the Higgs Ocean. A string that has mass (like an electron or bottom quark) are strings that can not move unimpeded through the Higgs field. Mass is simply the measure of that strings resistence to moving through the Higgs Ocean. A photon, gluon or graviton can move through the Higgs Ocean unimpeded. Once one looks at mass in this light, if one assumes that particles with mass can act upon other particles when they come in contact, there is no reason why a force particle would not act upon other particles when they come in contact: both are filaments of energy, the difference being that matter particles are impeded by the Higgs field and force particles are not.
I don't think that answers your question...I think I just gave a new backdrop for it. My point is that it is just as valid a question to ask where does matter get its "matterness" as to ask where does force get its "forcefulness." The answers would seem to be equivalent.
I think it may be time for a PhD to step in: I'm not sure how much more I can add to this subject. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Interbane  Amazingly Intelligent Gold Contributor

Usergroups: None
Joined: 09 Oct 2004
   
Posts: 682
Thanks Given: 12 Received: 24 in 20 Posts
Gender: 

|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 8:24 pm Post subject: Re: What causes gravity?
|
|
|
I've read "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene years ago and caught the gist that even though extrapolations can be made of the current theory to predict what a Graviton would be and act like, it is just as good as any other explanation until the predictions are observed.
I haven't read the newer book yet, I may have to do that. Hopefully it sheds a bit more light on things for me. I hear they're building a new collider also, one that may be able to observe previously unobserved particles. I trust Scientific American to keep me up to date there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Hemingway Intern
Usergroups: None
Joined: 22 Dec 2004
  
Posts: 188
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 7:48 am Post subject: Re: What causes gravity?
|
|
|
Interbane wrote: You mention mass as though for something to exist physically (that is have physical effects on things)it has to have mass.
No, I don't think that. But to have momentum without mass seems problematic - p = mv? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grmanny Getting comfortable
Usergroups: None
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
  
Posts: 9
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 6:15 pm Post subject: Re: What causes gravity?
|
|
|
| this interesting |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|