-
In total there are 44 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 43 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
-
-
Official Newbie!
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:33 am
- 8
- Location: Texas
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
As far as campaign reform, I think one of the first things they should do is not allow the current politicians to use tax payer dollars to campaign for their next elections Furthermore the taxpayers dollars are paying these politicians for time spent on these campaign trails rather than being present in Washington DC doing their jobs.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
What are the alternatives?Remember me wrote:As far as campaign reform, I think one of the first things they should do is not allow the current politicians to use tax payer dollars to campaign for their next elections Furthermore the taxpayers dollars are paying these politicians for time spent on these campaign trails rather than being present in Washington DC doing their jobs.
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
- CoolSummer
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:37 pm
- 9
- Location: Maryland
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
I don't like Hillary, I don't like Trump (except on his show, he's good there). I like Rand Paul, but being one of those middle or disenfranchised people I could lean toward that neurosurgeon as well. I just feel blah about politics as usual anymore. We almost need another party to shake things up, but then there would be three groups trying to say the same thing differently lol.
"Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
I am haunted by waters.”
I am haunted by waters.”
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
Of course we totally obsess over who's going to be president, with our absurdly long campaign season magnifying the obsession. The only mildly positive thing that can be said for this 2-year marathon is that it provides economic stimulus.
How much does it matter, in proportion to the time and money spent to elect, which individual grabs the brass ring? Whoever it is quickly becomes overwhelmed by the inertia of the entrenched powers and the need to keep the party in power.
This go-round, it's interesting to see how much the distrust of experience has progressed, with both top Republicans being political virgins and dong better because of it.
I'd have to choose Trump over Carson if absolutely forced.
How much does it matter, in proportion to the time and money spent to elect, which individual grabs the brass ring? Whoever it is quickly becomes overwhelmed by the inertia of the entrenched powers and the need to keep the party in power.
This go-round, it's interesting to see how much the distrust of experience has progressed, with both top Republicans being political virgins and dong better because of it.
I'd have to choose Trump over Carson if absolutely forced.
- Crystalline
-
Agrees that Reading is Fundamental
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 7:57 am
- 10
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 105 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
A lot of people are not paying any attention to all this election "noise" right now. They will decide two weeks or one week before the voting day. I watched a street poll being taken by the news media (forget which one, I think it was CNN) and some people didn't even know who the candidates were - unbelievable!!!
I don't think that either Trump or Carson will be the Republican candidate. Can't really guess who it may be. Personally, I like Kasich. But the person whom I like never makes it. ...
I don't think that either Trump or Carson will be the Republican candidate. Can't really guess who it may be. Personally, I like Kasich. But the person whom I like never makes it. ...
-
-
Getting Comfortable
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 11:14 am
- 8
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
"It can be argued that the US has been aggressive all along so these other nations are simply growing and demanding the respect they deserve. "
I do not think this can be argued by any but people with an agenda against Current Western democracy and liberal freedoms. I am an international person in some ways - I do read a couple international news papers every day, and have lived in many places. I do believe if any system other than Western Powers, and the Anglosphere really, were dominate, the world would be pretty much a Save/Master place.
Russia and China in the 1900's killed 70 to 80 million of their own people in the greatest slaughters ever known in the history of man.( OK, the Moguls killed 80 million in India according to some, but that was over a long time, of course they only had swords and spears, arrows and famine - may say something about Muslim conquest)
I am 100% behind Trump because I do not like the way immigration is going, nor the slide in patriotism under the Democrats. If you know Europe, England particularly, the demographic change in 30 years is utterly unbelievable.
The demographic change in USA during the last 40 years similar, but a different group of migrants. I worked in factories on lighting during the late 1990's and the automating is happening so fast it will change everything we know in 20 more years. The latest report from England is 7,000,000 jobs to be shed directly from automating in 15 years.
Sanders is pure decline. Clinton is more corporatism and internationalism with vote buying by free things to the migrant and lower income communities.
Trump is a complete ass and nuts - but he will bring the topics of what is good for USA to the table to be seen.
I do not think this can be argued by any but people with an agenda against Current Western democracy and liberal freedoms. I am an international person in some ways - I do read a couple international news papers every day, and have lived in many places. I do believe if any system other than Western Powers, and the Anglosphere really, were dominate, the world would be pretty much a Save/Master place.
Russia and China in the 1900's killed 70 to 80 million of their own people in the greatest slaughters ever known in the history of man.( OK, the Moguls killed 80 million in India according to some, but that was over a long time, of course they only had swords and spears, arrows and famine - may say something about Muslim conquest)
I am 100% behind Trump because I do not like the way immigration is going, nor the slide in patriotism under the Democrats. If you know Europe, England particularly, the demographic change in 30 years is utterly unbelievable.
The demographic change in USA during the last 40 years similar, but a different group of migrants. I worked in factories on lighting during the late 1990's and the automating is happening so fast it will change everything we know in 20 more years. The latest report from England is 7,000,000 jobs to be shed directly from automating in 15 years.
Sanders is pure decline. Clinton is more corporatism and internationalism with vote buying by free things to the migrant and lower income communities.
Trump is a complete ass and nuts - but he will bring the topics of what is good for USA to the table to be seen.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
Until now I thought Trump supporters were a myth. The man's an idiot.I am 100% behind Trump
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
- LanDroid
-
- Comandante Literario Supreme
- Posts: 2802
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 9:51 am
- 21
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 1166 times
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
That might explain a lot!Kinmle wrote:I am 100% behind Trump...
Trump is a complete ass and nuts...
- Murmur
-
Internet Sage
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:13 pm
- 8
- Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 128 times
- Gender:
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
Regarding the question that this topic is about: it doesn't truly matter which person is our next president, except for Trump. That would be truly horrible. The rest of the idiots are just more of the same.
- Robert Tulip
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6502
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
- 18
- Location: Canberra
- Has thanked: 2725 times
- Been thanked: 2665 times
- Contact:
Re: Is anyone else completely torn about who they want to be the next US President?
The President of the US is the leader of the free world, and we in Australia have been following the election campaigns with close media interest, since it is the biggest entertainment circus in the world, apart from the serious policy content.
I am also somewhat torn. There is a blogger I like called Mike Cernovich who is a Trump supporter, who really likes the cultural renewal theme of making America great again and confronting the airhead politics of the social justice warriors. The work Trump has done to make his money and build his public profile is really impressive and dynamic. But I have to admit, Trump reminds me somewhat of a potential fascist demagogue, liable to make some very stupid decisions deploying an awesome level of resources leading to dangerous conflict.
I consider that the rise of the internet left has been a disturbing recent social phenomenon, exemplified by Bernie Sanders. I feel Sanders is disengaged from some core principles of capitalist economics and would be too much of a tax and spend big government guy, sending the US on a stagnation path. On principle my economics follow Friedrich Hayek, who held that the role of government should be minimised in order to create room for private enterprise and growth of small and medium businesses in a free market. But given the plutocratic control of American politics, a big shake up may be a useful corrective so Sanders is not all bad.
The rest of the Republicans leave me cold. I think that Hillary Clinton is the most safe and sensible candidate to protect America's national interests and build friendly and peaceful international relations, given her immensely strong policy background. Bill Clinton was easily the best American President since JFK, and Hillary will follow in Bill's footsteps.
I am also somewhat torn. There is a blogger I like called Mike Cernovich who is a Trump supporter, who really likes the cultural renewal theme of making America great again and confronting the airhead politics of the social justice warriors. The work Trump has done to make his money and build his public profile is really impressive and dynamic. But I have to admit, Trump reminds me somewhat of a potential fascist demagogue, liable to make some very stupid decisions deploying an awesome level of resources leading to dangerous conflict.
I consider that the rise of the internet left has been a disturbing recent social phenomenon, exemplified by Bernie Sanders. I feel Sanders is disengaged from some core principles of capitalist economics and would be too much of a tax and spend big government guy, sending the US on a stagnation path. On principle my economics follow Friedrich Hayek, who held that the role of government should be minimised in order to create room for private enterprise and growth of small and medium businesses in a free market. But given the plutocratic control of American politics, a big shake up may be a useful corrective so Sanders is not all bad.
The rest of the Republicans leave me cold. I think that Hillary Clinton is the most safe and sensible candidate to protect America's national interests and build friendly and peaceful international relations, given her immensely strong policy background. Bill Clinton was easily the best American President since JFK, and Hillary will follow in Bill's footsteps.
Last edited by Robert Tulip on Sat Feb 20, 2016 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.