| Author |
Message |
pctacitus Senior
Usergroups: None
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
    
Posts: 354
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris OConnor  Rhodes Scholar BookTalk.org Owner

Usergroups: None
Joined: 05 May 2002
     
Posts: 7227
Thanks Given: 39 Received: 11 in 10 Posts
Gender: 
Location: Florida

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pctacitus Senior
Usergroups: None
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
    
Posts: 354
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:34 am Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
| I voted for the Meditations. …[T]o ignore the classics is ultimately to weaken the very foundations of our society. - James Atlas, Book Wars |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pessimistic  Professor Silver Contributor


Usergroups: None
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
   
Posts: 3522
Thanks Given: 5 Received: 6 in 6 Posts
Gender: 
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic

|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 10:26 am Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
When would this discussion period be? Would there be a time limit or just on-going?
Mr. P. The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.
I came to get down, I came to get down. So get out ya seat and jump around - House of Pain
HEY! Is that a ball in your court? - Mr. P
I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris OConnor  Rhodes Scholar BookTalk.org Owner

Usergroups: None
Joined: 05 May 2002
     
Posts: 7227
Thanks Given: 39 Received: 11 in 10 Posts
Gender: 
Location: Florida

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pctacitus Senior
Usergroups: None
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
    
Posts: 354
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:13 pm Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
| I figured we would not have a time limit. I just put up the poll now because I felt it might be best to time the poll to coincide with the Jan, Feb, Mar poll. We could limit ourselves to three months, but I had no intention of making that decision before seeing how many people were going through the chosen work at what rate. It may be that the great advantage a classic has is that it does not have a time limit like works that are relatively new. …[T]o ignore the classics is ultimately to weaken the very foundations of our society. - James Atlas, Book Wars |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pessimistic  Professor Silver Contributor


Usergroups: None
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
   
Posts: 3522
Thanks Given: 5 Received: 6 in 6 Posts
Gender: 
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic

|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 11:13 am Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
If there is no time limit, lets do it!
I would pick the Prince at this point...I have read it once and I am familiar with it. I dont know too much of the HISTORY of the time, so I could learn more on that.
Mr. P. The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.
I came to get down, I came to get down. So get out ya seat and jump around - House of Pain
HEY! Is that a ball in your court? - Mr. P
I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pctacitus Senior
Usergroups: None
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
    
Posts: 354
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:27 pm Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
It occurs to me that I never explained my vote. Let me first explain why I did not choose the other two. I have already read Antigone twice for different courses in my life. The Prince for the same reason four times. Both as recently as this fall.
I voted above for the Meditations because, 1) I had never read it. 2) It is a work that will make people ask questions, if for no other reason than no oneis really sure what many of the references mean. 3) As someone who is feeling a bit rudderless in life, reading someone talk about how they dealt with such problems seems like a good idea to me. …[T]o ignore the classics is ultimately to weaken the very foundations of our society. - James Atlas, Book Wars |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecstian I can enter The Chamber
Usergroups: None
Joined: 21 Dec 2003
   
Posts: 53
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2004 10:32 pm Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
I would definitely like to read one of the 3 above listed classics. The problem is that I would be happy with all three, especially since there are online copies of each. I think I personally lean toward Meditations as my first choice and Prince as a second choice. I have read excerpts of the writings of Marcus Aurelius and have found them inspiring. For now I will think a little more about which one to choose but if we run out of time before I post back, then I vote for Meditations.
Eric |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZachSylvanus  Sophomore Bronze Contributor


Usergroups: None
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
     
Posts: 271
Thanks Given: 2 Received: 8 in 7 Posts
Gender: 
Location: Fort Collins, CO

|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 1:45 am Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
| I voted for The Prince because I've not read it in a while, whereas I read bits and pieces of Meditations on and off repeatedly. I would be equally happy doing either, however. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MamaGadfly Getting comfortable
Usergroups: None
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
  
Posts: 8
Thanks Given: 0 Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender: 
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:03 am Post subject: Re: Which Classic would you like to read and discuss?
|
|
|
I also voted Meditations, largely because I've read the others several times...even taught Antigone while substituting (years ago....oh my). I'm embroiled in Dawkins now--Climbing Mount Improbable but with some time I could get a copy and read it of whatever is chosen.
ST I would defend the liberty of concenting adult creationists to practice whatever intellectual perversions they like in the privacy of their own homes; but it is also necessary to protect the young and innocent. -Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|