So the standards regarding what makes a theory a scientific theory are lower for contingent systems?Interbane wrote:No one is saying we understand everything. My point is that contingent systems are different. Comparing the predictive power of theories about necessary systems to theories about contingent systems is comparing apples to oranges.
We have many millions of clues, encompassed by the theory of evolution.ant wrote:We do not have a clue how single celled life evolved into conscious life.
Well..,, okay!
Never said anyone said "we" understand everything. That goes without saying.
What clues you in about how a single celled organism eventually developed the ability to do quantum phsyics, write poetry, paint the sistine chapel, and land on the moon?
Is the clue "because we are here"?