• In total there are 4 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 3 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Engage in conversations about worldwide religions, cults, philosophy, atheism, freethought, critical thinking, and skepticism in this forum.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.

All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
User avatar
Movie Nerd
Intelligent
Posts: 560
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 9:36 am
9
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Flann 5 wrote:Here are a few simple questions for you Bishop.
Does evil exist? What is it's origin and what is it?
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Justice usually states that only the punishment of the guilty is acceptable to justice and that it would be unjust to punish the innocent.
God’s corruption of this usual justice is what the bribe or sacrifice of Jesus bought. Injustice.

I've already pointed out that Christ's sacrifice was voluntary,and neither coerced or imposed upon him. He chose to do it.
You are simply distorting Christianity.
I expect you will not attempt to answer these questions about evil either.
You believe Christ's teachings are unjust.O.K.
How do you decide what is morally good and evil and to whom are you accountable?
You say Rome turned the old testament tyrant into a softer gentler God.
So you still believe Atwill's cockamamie story that a Caesar got Josephus to write the gospels,even though Tacitus says there were lots of Christians in Rome before the time Josephus supposedly wrote the fictional gospels?
Whether Jesus "chose" to do it or not, he was born into the world for the explicit purpose of dying for our sins. If he "chose" not to do it, then he wouldn't be what he was supposed to be. Which makes it not so much a free choice.
I am just your typical movie nerd, postcard collector and aspiring writer.
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Chris OConnor wrote:
Movie Nerd wrote:That's not him saying he is God, but him saying that the "true God" is the good we find within ourselves. It's the God of the Conscience, or the God of right over wrong. Which is different from someone thinking they are God, or thinking that they are more than anyone else.
It certainly is very different, but to this agnostic atheist it doesn't make any sense at all. Why call the conscience God? Why not just call the conscience the conscience?

Can one pray to their conscience? Does the conscience reward or punish the individual? If a person lacks a conscience does God suddenly cease to exist? It must because you're saying God is the conscience so if the conscience ends so must God. What sort of a deity is that?

To me a God must be a supernatural entity or it isn't really a God. A God either exists or does not exist and that existence shouldn't be tied to whether the God is perceived, worshiped or believed to exist.

If a being brought life to Earth billions of years ago and allowed it to evolve that being isn't a God unless it operates outside of the laws of physics. If it abides by the same laws we do it is an alien life form.
Hi Chris.

Movie Nerd already answered your question but I am trying to build a small library of explanations for why Gnostic Christians think as they do. I have the attention span of a gnat and think the longer my post, the less coherent it becomes, but I gave your question a try and hope you can understand what I put down. It would help me quite a bit though to have this critiqued so feel free to be brutal. My French does not produce the best English prose and deserves chastisement.

--------------

Why I continue using the word God.

The word God is described as an ideal and the epitome of all attributes. Place no one above me for anything is our basic first commandment.

Gnostic Christianity also has a historic connection to Jewish Kabbala and the Old Testament Divine Council, where a consolidation of Gods is subordinate to a higher elected God. This would make God a human in the oldest Jewish view.

Further, it was the custom of Rome that the emperors would name themselves Gods and their sons, sons of God. So the basic definition before all the Omni (s) were added on was that God meant a powerful man. Most today, from a Gnostic Christian point of view, are forgetting that, --- as above so below, --- demands that we match the divine hierarchy of heaven with our own on earth. On earth as it is in heaven.

These traditions are why our Gnostic Christian basic belief that the only God fit to rule mankind is a glorified man.

It is mankind who elected of created our first Gods and God and our present notions of what our creator God is are all man made and thus wrong. That God, if he ever existed is a mystery and should remain a myth.

Man evolved to be God and the only God we can know is a man. The only God you can know is within you.

The word and office of God, to a Gnostic Christian, means a glorified and exalted human being whose excellence has been decided upon by the elect.

That is the ultimate message of Revelation when all the foolish supernatural aspects are taken out of it.

The Christian distortion of the Jewish God has thus made it impossible for the elect to find their Gods here on earth and have moved our real God from earth to an inaccessible place in heaven.

Jesus urged us to seek God and instead of doing so and glorifying that person, Christianity put him in a book and glorifies it instead of seeking our real Gods and God.

The Jews have an old tradition of striving both for and against God. But Christianity is what has actually killed God and made him or her inaccessible to mankind.

This is just one of the reasons why Gnostic Christianity was decimated the moment Constantine bought the then named Orthodox Catholic Church.

The unruly child of Gnostic Christianity murdered their free thinking side and locked their thinking into literal belief of the God Rome invented for them. Rome became God and the world lost our true and elected God.

Regards
DL
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Movie Nerd wrote:[

I'm not familiar with any passages attributing Jesus' teachings on women or marriage, but I recall the scripture with the adulteress, where he said, "He who is without sin cast the first stone." That alone seems like a decent attitude towards women, but I would like to see what you're getting at, if you have any scripure verses I can look up.
Matthew 19;3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?

8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

Nowhere in scriptures that I know of does Jesus or God allow women to choose to divorce.

That is quite unjust as it would force women to stay in un-loving situations.

The above quote shows that men were in the same unjust boat except for adultery and if they did divorce for some other reason they would be branded as adulterers if they did find a loving woman.

Jesus seems to favor let no man put asunder which would be totally unjust as it forbids any in a loveless relationship to find love.

You will note that better than 60% of all Christians have been divorced so it seems that they do not like the no divorce option either.

Regards
DL[/quote]

Thanks for the references. It helps me to better understand.[/quote]

My pleasure.

Can I push you a bit and ask what you think of the morals of how divorce is handled by Christianity and their Jesus or God?

I think that, like hell, they invented their divorce policy to create guilt in the hearts of their adherents and lock them even deeper to the need for a hierarchical church.

IOW, they saw more money in it than what a more liberal policy would have produced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF6I5VSZVqc

Regards
DL
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Movie Nerd wrote:
Gnostic Bishop wrote: Eloquent perfection.

As a rough speaking Frenchman, I would love to have your tongue and temperament.

You seem to understand the concept I sell quite accurately and to my shame can express it better than I can. Full respect to you on this.

Regards
DL
Thanks mate. It was no big deal; I personally understood what you were saying just fine, and I think many other people would have understood you as well. I think Flann might have nitpicked for whatever reason, but I guess we all stumble over some things so I won't bash him on it too hard.
Thanks. I trust your judgement.

I think I might know a small bit of the psychology of why he nit pick.

This author shows it and other debate anomalies that you are likely aware of but let me put it here in case Flann 5 wants to learn why he likely does what he does.

Regards
DL
User avatar
Flann 5
Nutty for Books
Posts: 1580
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:53 pm
10
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 705 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Movie Nerd wrote:Whether Jesus "chose" to do it or not, he was born into the world for the explicit purpose of dying for our sins. If he "chose" not to do it, then he wouldn't be what he was supposed to be. Which makes it not so much a free choice.
No, I don't think so Nerd.
Had he chosen not to do it he would not have come into the world in the first place. The fact that he did does not show that he had no choice in the matter.
Here's how Paul puts it. "Christ Jesus who being in the form of God,did not consider it robbery to be equal with God,but made himself of no reputation,taking the form of a bondservant,and coming in the likeness of men.
And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death,even the death of the cross." Phil. 2;5-8.
In Christian theology Christ is God co-equal with the Father and Holy Spirit. Our sins are offenses against God and it is God himself in the incarnate Christ who voluntarily takes the just judgement for sins.
This is an act of grace and mercy by God,and salvation is freely offered to all on this basis.
Some feign crocodile tears at the supposed injustice done to Christ while finding fault with him and his teachings in every way they think they can.
So Bishop complains about the duration of punishment for sins whilst rejecting the gracious offer of forgiveness of sins on the just basis of atonement.How can you complain about the punishment of your sins at all, if you reject what God has done to provide a just basis for and free offer of forgiveness?
If you choose justice outside of atonement then that is what you will get.
Last edited by Flann 5 on Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Flann 5 wrote:
Here are a few simple questions for you Bishop.
Does evil exist? What is it's origin and what is it?
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Justice usually states that only the punishment of the guilty is acceptable to justice and that it would be unjust to punish the innocent.
God’s corruption of this usual justice is what the bribe or sacrifice of Jesus bought. Injustice.

I've already pointed out that Christ's sacrifice was voluntary,and neither coerced or imposed upon him. He chose to do it.
You are simply distorting Christianity.
Voluntary or not makes no difference. But how can you say that when Jesus said, I do my fathers will and not my own, and says , my father who sent me.

Scriptures also say that God chose him. That is not volunteering.

I repeat and you have yet to refute with a decent argument the following.

Having another innocent person suffer for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.
I expect you will not attempt to answer these questions about evil either.
You believe Christ's teachings are unjust.O.K.
How do you decide what is morally good and evil and to whom are you accountable?
I am ultimately accountable to the law that Jesus said I should write in my heart. I am thus only accountable to myself. I am and decide own law. I am an adult and accept the responsibility that you have refused to take and place on a scapegoat Jesus.

Seems that you like to be accountable to a God you think will die for you after condemning you. You would trust such a stupid unjust God!

As to evil, please see below.
You say Rome turned the old testament tyrant into a softer gentler God.
So you still believe Atwill's cockamamie story that a Caesar got Josephus to write the gospels,even though Tacitus says there were lots of Christians in Rome before the time Josephus supposedly wrote the fictional gospels?
Who ruled Rome in that day? The Emperor or religion?
Remember that there were many mystery schools and religions.

Who today is being forced to amend their theologies or philosophies?

Does religion dictate to government or does government kowtow to religions?

In anticipation of your reply----

Correct. Government rules over and controls religious policies. Religions have always been made to kowtow to Rome. Governments almost lost control in the Vatican' hay day but ultimately were put back in their chains. As it should be.

You should wonder why you follow a tyrannical dictator God while wanting a democratic government. So much for your, as above so below.

I thought I had given you my views on evil elsewhere but perhaps not. I have this that I had used for an O.P. and posed a question you might answer.

----------------------

Can you help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?
And if you cannot, why would God punish you?

Christians are always trying to absolve God of moral culpability in the fall by putting forward their free will argument and placing all the blame on mankind.
That usually sounds like ----God gave us free will and it was our free willed choices that caused our fall. Hence God is not blameworthy. Such statements simply avoid God's culpability as the author and creator of human nature.

Free will is only the ability to choose. It is not an explanation why anyone would want to choose "A" or "B" (bad or good action). An explanation for why Eve would even have the nature of "being vulnerable to being easily swayed by a serpent" and "desiring to eat a forbidden fruit" must lie in the nature God gave Eve in the first place. Hence God is culpable for deliberately making humans with a nature-inclined-to-fall, and "free will" means nothing as a response to this problem.

If all do evil/sin by nature then, the evil/sin nature is dominant. If not, we would have at least some who would not do evil/sin. Can we then help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?

Having said the above for the God that I do not believe in, I am a Gnostic Christian naturalist, let me tell you that evil and sin is all human generated and in this sense, I agree with Christians, but for completely different reasons. Evil is mankind’s responsibility and not some imaginary God’s. Free will is something that can only be taken. Free will cannot be given not even by a God unless it has been forcibly withheld.

Much has been written to explain evil and sin but I see as a natural part of evolution.

Consider.
First, let us eliminate what some see as evil. Natural disasters. These are unthinking occurrences and are neither good nor evil. There is no intent to do evil even as victims are created. Without intent to do evil, no act should be called evil.
In secular courts, this is called mens rea. Latin for an evil mind or intent and without it, the court will not find someone guilty even if they know that they are the perpetrator of the act.

Evil then is only human to human when they know they are doing evil and intend harm.
As evolving creatures, all we ever do, and ever can do, is compete or cooperate.
Cooperation we would see as good as there are no victims created. Competition would be seen as evil as it creates a victim. We all are either cooperating, doing good, or competing, doing evil, at all times.

Without us doing some of both, we would likely go extinct.

This, to me, explains why there is evil in the world quite well.

Be you a believer in nature, evolution or God, you should see that what Christians see as something to blame, evil, we should see that what we have, competition, deserves a huge thanks for being available to us. Wherever it came from, God or nature, without evolution we would go extinct. We must do good and evil.

There is no conflict between nature and God on this issue. This is how things are and should be. We all must do what some will think is evil as we compete and create losers to this competition.

This link speak to theistic evolution.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ProfMTH#g/c ... F680C1DBEB

If theistic evolution is true, then the myth of Eden should be read as a myth and there is not really any original sin.

Doing evil then is actually forced on us by evolution and the need to survive. Our default position is to cooperate or to do good. I offer this clip as proof of this. You will note that we default to good as it is better for survival.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBW5vdhr_PA

Can you help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?
And if you cannot, why would God punish you?

Regards
DL
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Flann 5 wrote:[
If you choose justice outside of atonement then that is what you will get.
If we reject immoral barbaric human sacrifice and placing our responsibilities for our sins on an innocent victim, to our shame, we get to put ourselves in heaven in the moral way that God really wants.

2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Timothy 2:4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

Note that your way, Jesus just saves a few.

God's way saves us all.

Any creator, be it God or nature, will created for the best possible end. If you want to have your creator look like a loser and create for less than the best possible end, --- then keep following the loser of a God you see in your idol worshiped bible.

Those with a better God know that none need saving as God has build into us whatever we need to save ourselves.

You would have God serve you by dying for you whereas Jesus asks us to serve God.

Step up to your responsibilities and stop trying to force God to do the unjust just to appease your fear of becoming a true man.

Regards
DL
User avatar
Flann 5
Nutty for Books
Posts: 1580
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:53 pm
10
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 705 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Gnostic Bishop wrote:Evil is mankind’s responsibility and not some imaginary God’s.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Can you help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?
And if you cannot, why would God punish you?
Gnostic Bishop wrote:I am ultimately accountable to the law that Jesus said I should write in my heart. I am thus only accountable to myself. I am and decide own law. I am an adult and accept the responsibility that you have refused to take and place on a scapegoat Jesus.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Doing evil then is actually forced on us by evolution and the need to survive.
I'll leave you to show how you are morally responsible based on these contradictory beliefs,Bishop.

You continue to push a revisionist,conspiracy theory laden version of history such as Atwill's absurd theory.
The gnostic gospels came later than the four gospels and so orthodox Christianity came before the gnostic aberrations and not the other way round as you assert.

On the historic realities here's Christian scholar Craig Evans setting the record straight. Titled; Fabricating Jesus.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIwV_gW5v4 I can't get a good link for this. It's youtube; Craig Evans;Fabricating Jesus.
Last edited by Flann 5 on Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:51 am, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Flann 5 wrote:
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Evil is mankind’s responsibility and not some imaginary God’s.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Can you help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?
And if you cannot, why would God punish you?
Gnostic Bishop wrote:I am ultimately accountable to the law that Jesus said I should write in my heart. I am thus only accountable to myself. I am and decide own law. I am an adult and accept the responsibility that you have refused to take and place on a scapegoat Jesus.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Doing evil then is actually forced on us by evolution and the need to survive.
I'll leave you to show how you are morally responsible based on these contradictory beliefs,Bishop.

You continue to push a revisionist,conspiracy theory laden version of history such as Atwill's absurd theory.
The gnostic gospels came later than the four gospels and so orthodox Christianity came before the gnostic aberrations and not the other way round as you assert.

On the historic realities here's Christian scholar Craig Evans setting the record straight. Titled; Fabricating Jesus.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIwV_gW5v4 I can't get a good link for this. It's youtube; Craig Evans;Fabricating Jesus.
The Jesus Seminar is all I need.

If you want to believe in a water walking God who can die, (sort of), and then walk about, then you go ahead child. Adults know better.

Man you must really fear growing up.

Regards
DL
User avatar
danimorg62
Gaining experience
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:33 pm
9
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Unread post

Do we have to have a label? Do the majority of people have a label? If you are not a Theist, then maybe Agnostic? Or Atheist? Or Anti-theist? Do you know anyone who is just... nothing?

I have a friend who was raised without religion. She went to a public school, did not go to church, doesn't know much about any holy book or the rites and rituals associated with religion. She doesn't give much thought to a god or anything supernatural. I asked her what she believes and she answered, "I don't have beliefs."

If I pose the question, "Is God the epitome of both good and evil?" to her, I imagine her answer will be something like, "Huh?" or "I have no idea." and I just think... she's brilliant.
Post Reply

Return to “Religion & Philosophy”