It follows that if the author's opinions "lend a great deal of nothing to the life worth living" then that person's life also must have nothing for a life worth living.Dexter wrote:Another great example of ant's reading skills and dishonestyant wrote: The newbie Taylor, who I'm guessing is an atheist because of his previous comment, has opined that an author who wrote an article about atheism not disproving religion has a life that is void of value.
This is what Taylor actually said:
No one else should have a problem seeing the difference.Taylor wrote:The article should have drown in the cesspool, It and the author lend a great deal of nothing to the life worth living.
I've never heard of the American Atheists, should I be paying dues?ant wrote:Are the American Atheists not representing True atheism?
Wasn't the Albanian dictator the official spokesman for atheism?
Keep googling for other opinions, and let us know what else atheism consists of. Who knows what views I'll have to accept next, this is quite a precarious situation!
That's also why anti-astrologists never seem to get anything done.ant wrote:That's why atheists collectively never get anything DONE - PERIOD.
The value of that person's life has been judged as falling short of true value measured by someone else.
How twisted is that?
Or maybe we should allow Taylor to clarify himself here. That way you don't have to play this ridiculous Knight in Shinning Atheist Armor to the rescue game.
It's not a surprise you're coming to his defense though, Dexter.
Really, it's not. You are pompously critical and patronizing to a certain group you have clearly marginalized.
I'd think your sense of "awe" for nature would keep you busy. But apparently youre not even wired for "awe"
You're wired for contempt at religion mostly.
Yes. You should check in with your local atheist organization. I think it would be healthy for you.
Thanks