I got this book of essays, published in 2009 by Harvard U. Press, from the library because what ant was saying about the myth of the religion/science conflict sounded interesting. I haven't gotten beyond skimming the table of contents, but from the titles I can see that a lot of the essays do attempt to refute the conflict thesis, and at least one discusses the religious contribution to science. However, myths about science and religion can go both ways, and one of the myths discussed is "That Christianity Gave Birth to Modern Science," which sounds like the Jaki thesis and is. Jaki is quoted at the head of the essay. Another myth addressed is "That 'Intelligent Design' Represents a Scientific Challenge to Evolution." One that ant might like is "That Giordano Bruno Was the First Martyr of Modern Science."
Looks as though it'll be interesting, if I can get around to reading the darn thing.
-
In total there are 39 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 38 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 851 on Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:30 am
Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 2200 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
That sounds interesting. The academic community is always looking for new ways to approach old material, and it seems to have found one with respect to the old conflict between science and religion. I would especially like to read how Galileo's case is presented.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
That book has been on my list for a while now.
A good book which i am nearly half way through is "The Beginnings of Western Science"
It frames the the development of science in the proper philosophical, religious, and institutional context.
The Conflict Thesis that is so popular today is largely the work of John Draper and Andrew Wright. The thesis is a shody work that is politically, professionally, and racially motivated. It is filled with methodological errors and numerous fallacies. No serious historian supports fhe conflict thesis. It is dismissed as a true account of history.
It is unfortunate that lazy biased minds buy into it.
The dicerning mind's task is to always analyze specific episodes contextually and avoid oversimplified soundbites.
It amazes me how some people who claim a monopoly on rationality are eager to avoid the true historical record so regularly.
History is without question a source of knowledge
Many people are not conscious of the cultural, political, and institutional influences of the past that gave birth to their personal bias.
The many Richard Dawkins apologists of today included.
A good book which i am nearly half way through is "The Beginnings of Western Science"
It frames the the development of science in the proper philosophical, religious, and institutional context.
The Conflict Thesis that is so popular today is largely the work of John Draper and Andrew Wright. The thesis is a shody work that is politically, professionally, and racially motivated. It is filled with methodological errors and numerous fallacies. No serious historian supports fhe conflict thesis. It is dismissed as a true account of history.
It is unfortunate that lazy biased minds buy into it.
The dicerning mind's task is to always analyze specific episodes contextually and avoid oversimplified soundbites.
It amazes me how some people who claim a monopoly on rationality are eager to avoid the true historical record so regularly.
History is without question a source of knowledge
Many people are not conscious of the cultural, political, and institutional influences of the past that gave birth to their personal bias.
The many Richard Dawkins apologists of today included.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 2200 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
I'm curious, what is this "conflict thesis" and what lazy biased minds are buying into it?ant wrote:No serious historian supports fhe conflict thesis. It is dismissed as a true account of history.
It is unfortunate that lazy biased minds buy into it.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
geo wrote:What is the "conflict thesis" and what lazy biased minds buy into it? Specifics please.ant wrote:No serious historian supports fhe conflict thesis. It is dismissed as a true account of history.
It is unfortunate that lazy biased minds buy into it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_thesis
Nobody buys into the idea that religion and science have always been at odds, Geo.
That's just a myth.
Everyone now rejects this ahistorical gibberish and there are no longer discussions that frame science and religion as natural enemies. We are indebted to all non believers for this.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 2200 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
Exactly my point. I've never heard anyone ever say "that religion and science have always been at odds." That does seem extreme.ant wrote:Nobody buys into the idea that religion and science have always been at odds, Geo.
That's just a myth.
My other point is I had never heard of the "conflict thesis" in my life until you brought it up. My goodness, there's even a Wikipedia entry on it now. That must mean something.
But “conflict thesis” aside, are you saying there is not now and never has been a conflict between science and religion?
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
I see conflict between science and religion everyday.
I was watching Cosmos episode one last night, and kept seeing Bruno portraying his idea as the result of god's will. Wasn't Galileo in much the same position? It's not as if their ideas were contradictory to religion, which has very little to say about the structure of the universe. Up until there was some solid disagreement, Evolution, there wasn't any real conflict intrinsic to the ideas being presented that we see as scientific. The only actual conflicting worldviews at the time were other religions, and the Inquisitions dealt with them. If Galileo, a friend of the pope, was put under house arrest for pushing an idea that wasn't all that conflicting, imagine what they would have done to Darwin, if he lived in those times.
I was watching Cosmos episode one last night, and kept seeing Bruno portraying his idea as the result of god's will. Wasn't Galileo in much the same position? It's not as if their ideas were contradictory to religion, which has very little to say about the structure of the universe. Up until there was some solid disagreement, Evolution, there wasn't any real conflict intrinsic to the ideas being presented that we see as scientific. The only actual conflicting worldviews at the time were other religions, and the Inquisitions dealt with them. If Galileo, a friend of the pope, was put under house arrest for pushing an idea that wasn't all that conflicting, imagine what they would have done to Darwin, if he lived in those times.
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
-
-
- One with Books
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:30 am
- 13
- Has thanked: 2280 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
yeah good thing he wasn't gay and looking to marry as wellInterbane wrote:imagine what they would have done to Darwin, if he lived in those times.
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
geo, you asked about the essay on Galileo. That's Myth 8: "Galileo Was Imprisoned and Tortured for Advocating Copernicanism," by Maurice A Finocchiaro. The author sifts the evidence and finds that Galileo wasn't imprisoned with the possible exception of three days (probably in the prosecutor's apartment). The author concludes that the available evidence suggests that Galileo was never tortured, but that he underwent interrogation with the threat of torture. He served years of house arrest as well. The author says that this contradicts the widely held belief that Galileo was imprisoned for a lengthy period and physically tortured.
This is not an incident that would be pointed to when disproving the conflict thesis, obviously. The Inquisition was very concerned with Galileo's unbiblical support of Copernicus. I believe that the writers in this book are saying not that there were never attempts by the Church to stifle or censure knowledge, but that when looked at over the span of centuries and the whole of Europe, Christianity was not, overall, acting in hostile ways toward examining nature, and that the Church can be credited indirectly and even directly with sometimes helping natural philosophy or science.
I imagine the Church is an entity that could be compared to the U.S. government. We can't say that over the last 230 years the government has acted in a particular way toward any movement over that span of time. The picture always changes. We may think of the Church as a monolith that controlled life over a vast territory in a uniform way for hundreds of years, but that isn't likely to have been the case.
A corollary to this is that the Church didn't plunge Europe into a Dark Ages during which learning was largely extinguished. In fact, there were no Dark Ages.
This is not an incident that would be pointed to when disproving the conflict thesis, obviously. The Inquisition was very concerned with Galileo's unbiblical support of Copernicus. I believe that the writers in this book are saying not that there were never attempts by the Church to stifle or censure knowledge, but that when looked at over the span of centuries and the whole of Europe, Christianity was not, overall, acting in hostile ways toward examining nature, and that the Church can be credited indirectly and even directly with sometimes helping natural philosophy or science.
I imagine the Church is an entity that could be compared to the U.S. government. We can't say that over the last 230 years the government has acted in a particular way toward any movement over that span of time. The picture always changes. We may think of the Church as a monolith that controlled life over a vast territory in a uniform way for hundreds of years, but that isn't likely to have been the case.
A corollary to this is that the Church didn't plunge Europe into a Dark Ages during which learning was largely extinguished. In fact, there were no Dark Ages.
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: Galileo Goes to Jail--and Other Myths
Great post, DWill
But also recall that during the G Affair the Church as a governing body was fighting for its life in the 30 Year War. Urban was under extreme duress and was some might say provoked by Galileo by his characyerization of him as "Simplicio."
The Church had reauired Galileo to present heliocentrism as a hypothesis because of the lack of evidence for it at the time (it ran completley contrary to experience, Galileo was wrong about what caused the tides, etc etc).
Galileo was NOT tortured. Thats just plain bullshit, of course. Actually, he had been a good friend to Pope Urban, who had to "save face" in light of Galileo's surprising mockery of him.
And there's much more to the trial, of course. much more.
Thanks for posting about this and sharing some of your opinions with us.
But also recall that during the G Affair the Church as a governing body was fighting for its life in the 30 Year War. Urban was under extreme duress and was some might say provoked by Galileo by his characyerization of him as "Simplicio."
The Church had reauired Galileo to present heliocentrism as a hypothesis because of the lack of evidence for it at the time (it ran completley contrary to experience, Galileo was wrong about what caused the tides, etc etc).
Galileo was NOT tortured. Thats just plain bullshit, of course. Actually, he had been a good friend to Pope Urban, who had to "save face" in light of Galileo's surprising mockery of him.
And there's much more to the trial, of course. much more.
Thanks for posting about this and sharing some of your opinions with us.