Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3893 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 562 times in 454 posts
Gender: Country:
These comments are on the first approximately 350 lines of the book. Milton speaks as himself, of himself, for the first time in the first 55 lines. These are very beautiful lines and remind me why Milton is widely considered to be second, after Shakespeare, of writers of English. I might agree, despite the problems I have with his style. He speaks so movingly of his blindness here.
The council in Heaven has interesting parallels to Satan's council in Hell. Milton means for the comparison to be all in favor of God, but I wonder. God is a character who can be interpreted like any other, and the picture I get of him initially is not as the loving father figure we might want to see, but as legal-minded, self-justifying, and smug. He uses the first-person pronoun quite a lot, and in his me, me ,me talk he brings Satan to mind. He is not a tyrant, of course, but he does lord it over everybody, how fair and blameless he is. It should be no surprise that we would react negatively to him, in that we always do so here on earth with know-it-alls, and God is the prize know-it-all. He knows everything that Adam and Eve, and Satan, will do, but his foreknowledge implies no necessity for them to act this way. If they had acted some other way, his foreknowledge would have been of them acting this other way. It's hard to wrap the mind around this thinking. Free will is of course God's big emphasis as he talks about the angels' and man's ultimate responsibility for what they did.
The drama is slight in this section. God tells about his willingness to extend mercy to man because the sin is going to be one of weakness rather than of intended evil, as with Satan. But, darn, he says, whoever would volunteer for the job it will take to satisfy justice in the case against man? The son volunteers, of course, to God's great gratitude. At least he didn't say, "I knew you were going to say that." Somewhat mitigating the degree of God's sacrifice is that he will have the Son restored to him after he suffers on earth. When we think about God's justice, how strange it can seem that for the crime of tasting fruit, Adam and Eve as well as all their future progeny must die and be condemned to Hell forever;
and that to prevent this from happening the only answer is for someone to die in their place, to vicariously atone for their sin. It is almost as if God is responding to some mandate above him. What he proposes seems to me to make little sense. I don't recall that Pandora was condemned in the Greek myth, after loosing the evils of the world from the box, which roughly compares to what Eve did.
After all the theologizing that happens in this book, it's a relief to come back to Satan and see what the wily fellow is up to.
Dwill I must chuckle at your comfort in sitting back to see what the 'wiley devil' is up to next. I'm a bit surprised I have managed to get this far this time around...reading this is even more difficult than reading the Bible itself.
Grindle
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3893 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 562 times in 454 posts
Gender: Country:
Grindle, if you're into Book III yet, you're almost one-quarter of the way there! This is very densely packed writing, more so than the Bible, I think you're right. If it's any incentive, by getting through Book XII, by my unscientific estimate you will be in the elite .0001% of the population to have done so. And then you'll be more than justified in reading whatever trashy stuff you might have felt guilty about reading before.
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3893 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 562 times in 454 posts
Gender: Country:
I hope it's not rushing things, but I'd like to say something briefly about the rest of Bk. III before we get to the action in Eden. (By the way, I'm always realizing how ignorant I am about many things. I didn't know that the garden is supposedly just a part of a much larger area called Eden. "East of Eden" may then mean in the eastern part of Eden.)
As Satan cruises around toward the "world" (all the planets, the sun, and some outer rings), he spots an area that God uses as a limbo of vanities. Milton invents this, apparently. He puts people here who were just way wrong about what they believed. The Catholic monks from the various orders are here, as well as pilgrims who thought they could find Jesus' presence in Palestine, not knowing he is in Heaven. Milton, of course, was above all anti-Catholic.
The detail with which Milton describes this Ptolemaic universe is very impressive. Think of dictating all of this. At line 586, Milton mentions Gallileo's 1609 discovery of sunspots, one of several references in PL to contemporary astronomy:
So wondrously was set his Station bright.
There lands the Fiend, a spot like which perhaps
Astronomer in the Sun's lucent Orbe
Through his glaz'd Optic Tube yet never saw.
When Satan spots Uriel standing guard at the entrance to the world, he assumes the first of several disguises. Satan fools Uriel because "neither Man nor angel can discern/Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks/Invisible, except to God alone,/By his permissive will, through heav'n and earth." (683-685). The note to these lines says that "permissive will" contrasts with "active will." Apparently, angels and humans just came out this way, and God didn't feel compelled to do anything about it. But maybe this is a clever way of Milton's to explain how Satan gets by security.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3223 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 819 Thanked: 817 times in 614 posts
Gender: Country:
DWill wrote:
When Satan spots Uriel standing guard at the entrance to the world, he assumes the first of several disguises. Satan fools Uriel because "neither Man nor angel can discern/Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks/Invisible, except to God alone,/By his permissive will, through heav'n and earth." (683-685). The note to these lines says that "permissive will" contrasts with "active will." Apparently, angels and humans just came out this way, and God didn't feel compelled to do anything about it. But maybe this is a clever way of Milton's to explain how Satan gets by security.
You know, this got me thinking about a parallel with 911. How extraordinarily amazing it was that the hijackers got past all the defences of the USA, and managed to destroy the biggest and most iconic buildings in the world. It is a bit like Satan conning Uriel - o I am just a sweet innocent cherub, and by the way where is the earth? Like Atta saying, yes keen to learn to fly, not worried about landing though. The naive angel Uriel twigs to the nefarious plot and hotfoots it to Paradise, but alas the evil snake is already whispering sweet nothings in Eve's ear, a tiny memetic virus that is enough to produce our catastrophic fall from grace.
I think it may be more common for this image of the 'hero' wending through various defences and achieving their goal against tremendous odds to be the other way around - good triumphing over evil rather than the reverse. Think Frodo and Mount Doom in Lord of the Rings, Neo v the Machine in The Matrix, or Luke Skywalker v the Death Star in Star Wars. Maybe I just don't like movies where evil triumphs.
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 836 Location: Wyse Fork, NC
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
DWill wrote:
When Satan spots Uriel standing guard at the entrance to the world, he assumes the first of several disguises. Satan fools Uriel because "neither Man nor angel can discern/Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks/Invisible, except to God alone, . . .
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3893 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 562 times in 454 posts
Gender: Country:
Robert Tulip wrote:
DWill wrote:
When Satan spots Uriel standing guard at the entrance to the world, he assumes the first of several disguises. Satan fools Uriel because "neither Man nor angel can discern/Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks/Invisible, except to God alone,/By his permissive will, through heav'n and earth." (683-685). The note to these lines says that "permissive will" contrasts with "active will." Apparently, angels and humans just came out this way, and God didn't feel compelled to do anything about it. But maybe this is a clever way of Milton's to explain how Satan gets by security.
You know, this got me thinking about a parallel with 911. How extraordinarily amazing it was that the hijackers got past all the defences of the USA, and managed to destroy the biggest and most iconic buildings in the world. It is a bit like Satan conning Uriel - o I am just a sweet innocent cherub, and by the way where is the earth? Like Atta saying, yes keen to learn to fly, not worried about landing though. The naive angel Uriel twigs to the nefarious plot and hotfoots it to Paradise, but alas the evil snake is already whispering sweet nothings in Eve's ear, a tiny memetic virus that is enough to produce our catastrophic fall from grace.
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3893 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 562 times in 454 posts
Gender: Country:
Thomas Hood wrote:
DWill wrote:
When Satan spots Uriel standing guard at the entrance to the world, he assumes the first of several disguises. Satan fools Uriel because "neither Man nor angel can discern/Hypocrisy, the only evil that walks/Invisible, except to God alone, . . .
Milton is wrong about us not being able to spot deception. We spot it easy enough once we suspect it.Tom
It does seem that perhaps Milton made the statement more to justify Satan's being able to evade detection, not because it is an accurate observation. The key ingredient in detection is "once we suspect it." The window of opportunity, where we are naive about others' intending harm to us, can be exploited by Satan and the 911 highjackers both. After we find we've been fooled, we're then likely to overcompensate by seeing threats everywhere, a tendency which manifested in the post-911 response.
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 29
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 3 times in 3 posts
Gender: Country:
I suppose the main subject of this book is really free will. Milton has also introduced the idea of predestination as it applies to god's omniscience.
Its interesting that when you go and read critques of PL there is a lot of confusion regarding the inclusion of both of these beliefs (freewill/predest).
The fact that god knows how all events will turn out does not mean that predestination rules, rather within each event all characters have the free will to make any choice, god just knows what those choices will be before they are made.
I suppose the main subject of this book is really free will. Milton has also introduced the idea of predestination as it applies to god's omniscience. Its interesting that when you go and read critques of PL there is a lot of confusion regarding the inclusion of both of these beliefs (freewill/predest). The fact that god knows how all events will turn out does not mean that predestination rules, rather within each event all characters have the free will to make any choice, god just knows what those choices will be before they are made.
Through all of this, I find myself thinking about C.G. Jung's Answer to Job and the fact that after 911, even though you may now be paranoid, it doesn't mean no one is after you...I only hope that there is, after all, a terriffic sense of humor out there to match the minds that seem to be impelled to question...
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3893 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 562 times in 454 posts
Gender: Country:
Ibid wrote:
Its interesting that when you go and read critques of PL there is a lot of confusion regarding the inclusion of both of these beliefs (freewill/predest). The fact that god knows how all events will turn out does not mean that predestination rules, rather within each event all characters have the free will to make any choice, god just knows what those choices will be before they are made.
Milton seems to have accepted the existence of predestination but also believed that the rest could earn their salvation. Maybe to repudiate presestination altogether was too radical a step for him.
Some I have chosen of peculiar grace
Elect above the rest; so is my will:
The rest shall hear me call, and oft be warnd [ 185 ]
Thir sinful state, and to appease betimes
Th' incensed Deitie while offerd grace
Invites; for I will cleer thir senses dark,
What may suffice, and soft'n stonie hearts
To pray, repent, and bring obedience due
God works really hard on the argument that his foreknowledge doesn't imply determinism of individual actions. But the point that should be argued is whether this forekowledge of a truly free action could ever exist in any being, no matter how supernaturally powerful. Without being able to explain myself well on this point, it seems to me that the result of this supposedly free choice has to be absolutely unpredictable and unforeknowable if it is indeed free. God insisting that he knew which way they would choose is not just unattractively know-it-all, but outside of logic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.
Support BookTalk.org
BookTalk.org is being upgraded to a totally new design. This upgrade is expensive. Any support would be VERY helpful! See who supports us.
Make a donation
PEOPLE PAYING FOR OUR UPGRADE:
• afv - $10 May
• LevV - $50 March
• Dexter - $10 March
• supernova38 - $25 March
• Oblivion - $20 March
• jheimlich - $20 February
• Robert Tulip - $50 February
• giselle - $50 January
Children here need worming
regularly, and I think I
need to buy more worming
tablets, so while my friends
sit on the beach, I have to
catch bush taxis up to the… more
The children have a long way
to walk to the nearest primary
school. At the moment they are
in temporary accommodation,
with volunteer teachers. There
is community land available,
a… more
The price of The 12th Disciple
has been updated to $3.99 for
Kindle readers. The book is
still available for free to
borrow for Amazon Prime
members. To be
competitive, and s… more
The 12th Disciple has been
reviewed by two different
people on Amazon. They
purchased the Kindle edition;
one in the US, one in the
UK. One review was
5-stars (US) and the oth… more
I'd like to say I've
been reading Harry Potter
since the day the world renown
series appeared on the
scene. Unfortunately,
the truth is I began reading
Harry Potter… more
Easter teaches many of us the
importance of redemption and
resurrection. Regardless of
what faith people follow, the
story of Jesus Christ has been
told in many languages in many
c… more
Our Book Talk will begin on
Wednesday, May 2nd. I look
forward to hearing about your
learning and classroom
experiences with Number Talks
as it all unfolds...
NONOPPOSITIONAL NONVIOLENCE
“The minute you conquer the
fear of death, at that moment
you are free. I submit to you
that if a man hasnÂ’t
discovered something that he
will die f… more
Yesterday, when I went to feed
Jeni the donkey, I noticed
swarms of bees entering
EbrimaÂ’s house through the
cracks in the door. We both
had a look, but he didnÂ’t
open his door… more
Whether you want to implement
number talks but are unsure of
how to begin or have
experience but want more
guidance in crafting
purposeful problems, this
dynamic multimedia resourc… more
Do you feel entitled? For
years I have listened to and,
in some instances, complained
that some people in America
feel entitled. For years I
have watched as these people
are portra… more
On Fat Tuesday and Ash
Wednesday of 2012, The 12th
Disciple was free to Kindle
users on both days. In all,
about 550 worldwide Kindle
users downloaded a copy of the
book.
‘Sacred Are the Brave’ a
collection of short stories
about the nonviolent
revolutions 1986-1989 is now
available in Kindle. Each of
the nine stories has
characters who are just
… more
The Weekend TrippersÂ’ is the
true story of Rfn Ted Taylor
and his part in the heroic
last stand in Calais May 1940.
The Weekend Trippers is based
on TedÂ’s diaries written at
the… more
Tell your friends when to meet you in the BookTalk.org Chat Room.
If you enjoy business bestsellers and would like to expand your business knowledge check out the quality book summaries offered by the world's leading book summary company.
BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.