Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:10 am

<< Week of September 30, 2016 >>
Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
30 Day Month

1 Day Month

2 Day Month

3 Day Month

4 Day Month

5 Day Month

6 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Monotheism in The Canterbury Tales 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Rhodes Scholar

BookTalk.org Moderator
Platinum Contributor

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4026
Location: NC
Thanks: 1549
Thanked: 1632 times in 1246 posts
Gender: Male

Post Monotheism in The Canterbury Tales
Having just read Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, I was struck by the presence of Greek gods in several of the stories—most notably the Knight's Tale, the Nun's Priest Tale, and the Franklin's Tale. Owing to the fact that I'm reading Wright'sThe Evolution of God, it seems to me that The Canterbury Tales is a good example of old gods remaining culturally alive even when Christianity has long since displaced them. The move from polytheism to monotheism must have left a lot of gods behind, but those old gods don't disappear entirely. Even to this day, Greek/Roman culture is fairly intertwined with our own; most of us know that Zeus was the main god, Poseidon was the god of the sea, and Venus the goddess of love, and Cupid had something to do with love as well. By Jove!

Forgive me if Wright discusses this in his book. I'm on the chapter, "From Monolatry to Montotheism."

It is especially interesting to see how easily Chaucer weaves Greek/Roman gods into his narrative right alongside Christian themes. To an outside observer, one might conclude that this culture embraced all these gods, Greek/Roman/Christian. There's no sense of monotheism at all, at least not in those tales listed above.

The Canterbury Tales was written at the end of the 14th century. The tales are framed as a story-telling contest by a group of pilgrims as they travel to see the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral. So the characters are Christian and, yet, the old gods of Greek mythology are present in romanticized form. Perhaps those elements of Greek myth still provided a meaningful framework for exploring the human condition. The Knight's Tale, for example, contains typical aspects of knighthood such as courtly love and ethical dilemmas, but it is actually set in Athens of ancient Greece and features several Roman/Greco gods as characters in the story who intervene into the lives of the mortals. Chaucer spends a lot of verse describing temples made to honor Venus, the goddess of love, Mars, the god of war, and Diana, the goddess of chastity.

The Nun's Priest's Tale, otherwise known as Chaunticleer and the Fox, is also a medieval tale, but contains many references to Greek philosophy. In one scene, Lady Pertelote, one of the hens, laments to the goddess Venus when the fox takes Chanticleer on a Friday (which is Venus' day):

Quote:
"O destiny, you cannot be eschewed!
Alas, that Chauntecleer flew from the beams!
Alas, his wife recked nothing of his dreams!
And on a Friday fell all this mischance.

O Venus, who art goddess of pleasance,
Since he did serve thee well, this Chauntecleer,
And to the utmost of his power here,
More for delight than cocks to multiply,
Why would'st thou suffer him that day to die?"


I say this is damned interesting stuff. I could see doing a Masters or PhD thesis on god-blending in Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales.. You can see this to some extent in Beowulf, an epic poem composed in the 8th century and though superficially framed with Christian themes, is actually steeped in Anglo-Saxon paganism. Indeed, the old paganism is looked upon with fond remembrance. Old religions apparently die hard.


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


The following user would like to thank geo for this post:
DWill, Robert Tulip
Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:07 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4996
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1628
Thanked: 1626 times in 1229 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Re: Monotheism in The Canterbury Tales
Hi Geo, thanks for this very interesting take. I have avoided Chaucer because of the antiquated language. Did you read him in a modernised version?

My view, just as a mythic fantasy, is that the Greco-Roman Gods match to the energies of their corresponding planets, so Apollo is the Sun, Hermes and Mercury are Mercury, Venus and Aphrodite are Venus, Gaia is Earth, Ares and Mars are Mars, Zeus and Jupiter are Jupiter, Kronos and Saturn are Saturn. Then it becomes less clear with the outer planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, given they were not known to the ancients. In any event, saying these Gods are not real is a bit like saying the planets are not real.

We have been brainwashed by an aggressive inquisition into fear of talking about the relative meaning of different Gods. There is nothing absolute about the Bible except what we see in it. This theme of God-blending provides the impetus for American Gods by Neil Gaiman, which we discussed at Booktalk last year. The return of Odin and Thoth presents an intriguing thought experiment.



The following user would like to thank Robert Tulip for this post:
geo
Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:31 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Rhodes Scholar

BookTalk.org Moderator
Platinum Contributor

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4026
Location: NC
Thanks: 1549
Thanked: 1632 times in 1246 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Monotheism in The Canterbury Tales
Hi Robert,

I read the Penguin classics version which includes the original text and modern translation on opposing pages. This seems a good way to read it. To be honest I only looked at the Middle English occasionally. My only disappointment was this particular version is a selection of Canterbury Tales, so it is abridged.

I have to mention that a few weeks ago I was on a walk with my wife. I started talking about The Canterbury Tales and very soon after she mentioned something she read in People magazine. All of a sudden she started laughing because I was talking about high-brow literature and she was talking about gossip in People magazine. Only the real joke was that many of the tales are quite bawdy. One of the tales has a a woman farting in some guy's face and in the same tale, the same guy sticks a hot iron in someone's arse. High-brow indeed! :lol:

Actually I meant to mention that several of the Tales make reference to astrological signs and positions of celestial bodies. Obviously, astrology was very meaningful in the 15th century. Many people would call that pseudoscience, but I can see how astrology as such can be seen in a mythological context to explore the human condition just as humans have done for so very long with Greek mythology. What is interesting is that folks back then apparently were much more aware of the positions of planets and stars than we are in the modern era. To me that is a shame.

Other forms of "pseudoscience" are prominent in the Tales as well, in particular, the humors. It was believed that everyone possesses different proportions of four humors and that would influence their temperament.

- The humor of Blood, associated with the liver and with Air, which is the hot and moist element. A person in whom blood predominates is said to be "sanguine," from the Latin "sanguis" (blood).

- The humor of Yellow Bile, associated with the spleen and with Fire, which is the hot and dry element. A person in whom yellow bile predominates is said to be "choleric," from the Greek "khole" (bile).

- The humor of Black Bile, associated with the gall bladder and with Earth, which is the cold and dry element. A person in whom black bile predominates is said to be "melancholic," from the Greek "melas" (black) and "khole" (bile).

- The humor of Phlegm, associated with the lungs and brain and with Water, which is the cold and moist element. A person in whom phlegm predominates is said to be "phlegmatic," from the Greek "phlegmatikos" (abounding in phlegm) .

I recently downloaded a paper from University of North Carolina's library entitled "Pseudoscience in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. It looks pretty interesting. Let me know if you're interested in reading it. I'll PM you the link.


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Thu Sep 23, 2010 3:29 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4996
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1628
Thanked: 1626 times in 1229 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Re: Monotheism in The Canterbury Tales
Our modern understanding of what ancients were talking about when they discussed Gods is very shallow. For example, Virgil describes how the Goddess Rumor spread through the Latian community, as a way of talking about something real. Similarly, Nemesis is "the spirit of divine retribution against those who succumb to hubris (arrogance before the gods). The Greeks personified vengeful fate as a remorseless goddess." Theosophists equate nemesis with karma, and criticize modern science for its skepticism about both. The trouble here is that if we say rumor, panic and nemesis are not real, just because the associated myths are fanciful, then the ancient claims about hubris may again come into play.



Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:09 pm
Profile Email WWW
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5547
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1395
Thanked: 1403 times in 1096 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Monotheism in The Canterbury Tales
Great discussion, geo and Robert. My wife and I have planned to read and listen to the "CT," and it will be interesting for me to see how they appear 30-plus years after first reading them. The inclusion of so much classical myth is hard to explain, perhaps, when you consider that Chaucer is not a Renaissance writer. But Chaucer was a true phenomenon, more amazing than Shakespeare even, in the sense that he appears to stand entirely alone whereas Shakespeare had a good deal of highly competent company. I do love the Middle English. Maybe that comes from the somewhat painful experience of having to memorize and recite the General Prologue! Geo, you're right about the level of the brow in Chaucer. It's generally not very high at all. People might be surprised at this, just as they are to discover that Don Quixote is anything but lofty in subject and tone.


_________________
No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one's existence--that which makes its truth, its meaning--its subtle penetrating essence. It is impossible. We live as we dream--alone.

Joseph Conrad, The Heart of Darkness


Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:29 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

BookTalk.org Newsletter 

Announcements 

• Resources related to Uncle Tom's Cabin
Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:28 pm



Site Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

Featured Books

Books by New Authors


*

FACTS is a select group of active BookTalk.org members passionate about promoting Freethought, Atheism, Critical Thinking and Science.

Apply to join FACTS
See who else is in FACTS







BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.



Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2016. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank