You are browsing the forum as a guest. Please log in or register to access additional features.
Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ABOUT BOOKS VIDEOS TRANSCRIPTS LINKS BLOGS DONATE CONTACT  

     Log in   Register 


BookTalk.org News
• If you are having trouble with logging into your account or making posts please know that we are working to resolve this issue. Please delete your temporary Internet files and cookies (at least those for our site) and stay tuned to see if that resolves the issue. If not our web designer believes he can find the code that is causing the issue.

Links & Resources

Community Rules & Tips
For Authors & Publishers
Link to our old forum
Our Amazon.com Statistics
Book Suggestions
Donations to BookTalk.org
BookTalk Forum Statistics
Games 170 FREE Games


Featured Videos

Robert Burton
"On Being Certain"


Robert Burton - On Being Certain

More Videos


Author Interviews

  

Featured Member Blogs

Ophelia's Blog
Lawrenceindestin's Blog
Penelope's Blog
Frank 013's Blog

- All Member Blogs
- Blog News


Chat Room

Enter the BookTalk.org Chat Room
Enter Chat Room

Show us where you live!
BookTalk.org Member Map

Donate & Support BookTalk.org

Please support our free community by making a credit card donation through our secure PayPal account. We appreciate and depend on the generosity of our members. Thank you!

See who supports us


Display Pagerank


If Theism isn't a Delusion, Then What Is It?

Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BookTalk.org Forum Index -> Archived Book Discussions 2006-2007 -> The God Delusion - by Richard Dawkins
Author Message
Chris OConnor Chris OConnor has been starred
Rhodes Scholar
BookTalk.org Owner

Avatar



Joined: 20 Oct 2000

Posts: 6849
Gender: Male
Location: Florida
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:46 am    Post subject: If Theism isn't a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
If Theism isn't a Delusion, Then What Is It?
From Austin Cline's About.com Guide to Agnosticism / Atheism

Religious theists, including Christians, commonly react negatively and defensively if their theism is described as a "delusion." This is understandable because a delusion can be type of, or a symptom of, a mental illness. No one wants to think that of themselves, especially with respect to something so fundamental to their lives. We cannot dismiss the "delusion" label simply because people don't like it, however. Instead, we must look at whether belief in a god fits the standard definition.

Read More...




Read the comments to the article too. One reader said:

Quote:
I suspect that this issue wouldn’t be coming up if the “deluded” would just keep their “faith” to themselves. By keeping it front and center, and in our “faces” so much of the time, they’ve made us examine and identify it–to their detriment.

I don’t see it necessarily interfering with their lives, specifically their jobs, although they do steal from the boss when they insist on jabbering about their “savior” while on the clock. Otherwise, a little (or a lot!) discretion could ease the pressure on them.

OTOH, they get very prickly about having to “pipe down”, don’t they? And they conveniently play the martyr, thus fulfilling all our suspicions that they are delusional.

I rest my case…

Back to top
Frank 013 Frank 013 has been starred
Beyond Awesome
BookTalk.org Moderator

Avatar



Joined: 08 Nov 2005

Posts: 1068
Gender: Male
Location: NY
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:22 am    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn't a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
So the common argument against religion being a delusion is that it’s a popular belief, and that it does not always negatively affect people’s lives?

I don’t think either of those were part of the delusion definition.

Later

Back to top
Niall001 Niall001 has been starred
Stupendously Brilliant





Joined: 18 Sep 2003

Posts: 770
Gender: Male



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:23 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
Frank, that\'s because there isn\'t really a definition for delusion. It means whatever the speaker wants it to mean most of the time.

Generally, something is thought of as being a delusion if it is an uncommon perception, which brings into focus the fact that when people speak of reality, they generally speak of a bunch of things the vast majority of people agree about.

Full of Porn*

http://plainofpillars.blogspot.com

Back to top
Frank 013 Frank 013 has been starred
Beyond Awesome
BookTalk.org Moderator

Avatar



Joined: 08 Nov 2005

Posts: 1068
Gender: Male
Location: NY
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:53 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
Quote:
Niall
Frank, that\'s because there isn\'t really a definition for delusion. It means whatever the speaker wants it to mean most of the time.

Generally, something is thought of as being a delusion if it is an uncommon perception, which brings into focus the fact that when people speak of reality, they generally speak of a bunch of things the vast majority of people agree about.



I thought it meant…

A persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence, especially as a symptom of psychiatric disorder.

Back to top
Mr. Pessimistic Mr. Pessimistic has been starred
Assistant Professor
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar



Joined: 16 Jun 2004

Posts: 3449
Gender: Male
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:55 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
So by that, to say that Copernicus/Galileo's heliocentric model of the universe was delusional in their respective times was a valid stance? So is delusion then measured by a groups ability to marshal evidence in support of an idea? And lack of evidence to support an otherwise correct idea is a delusion?

Mr. P.


I'm not saying it's usual for people to do those things but I(with the permission of God) have raised a dog from the dead and healed many people from all sorts of ailments. - Asana Boditharta (former booktalk troll)

The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.

What is all this shit about Angels? Have you heard this? 3 out of 4 people believe in Angels. Are you F****** STUPID? Has everybody lost their mind? - George Carlin

I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper

Edited by: misterpessimistic  at: 3/28/07 6:09 pm
Back to top
Frank 013 Frank 013 has been starred
Beyond Awesome
BookTalk.org Moderator

Avatar



Joined: 08 Nov 2005

Posts: 1068
Gender: Male
Location: NY
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:05 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
Quote:
Mr. P
So by that, to say that Copernicus/Galileo's helicentric model of the universe was delusional in their respective times was a valid stance? So is delusion then measured by a groups ability to marshal evidence in support of an idea? And lack of evidence to support an otherwise correct idea is a delusion?


Absolutely especially if the believers are nuts!

Later

Back to top
Niall001 Niall001 has been starred
Stupendously Brilliant





Joined: 18 Sep 2003

Posts: 770
Gender: Male



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:15 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
Quote:
So by that, to say that Copernicus/Galileo's helicentric model of the universe was delusional in their respective times was a valid stance? So is delusion then measured by a groups ability to marshal evidence in support of an idea? And lack of evidence to support an otherwise correct idea is a delusion?


Well, it all depends on who is talking and when. A delusion is usually what we consider a false perception. Of course, in order to decide what is a false perception, we have to know what a true perception is. That is pretty difficult, given that we don't have direct access to reality. We have only perceptions.

The notion that delusion can somehow be measured by one's ability to find evidence that supports the belief is crude. First, you have to agree upon the criteria of what constitutes evidence. And there in lies the problem. It is about agreement.

Now that is not to say that we should not say that Crazy Sally who claims to be a Martian clone of Barbara Bush can not be regarded as delusional in the every day sense. Generally, we tend to agree on the criteria for when it is prudent to regard somebody as delusional. However, we, and by we, I mean humanity, generally do not think that it the criteria we use in a situation the one I just mentioned can be used in every situation. Otherwise, we would be lumping you two fine gents in the same boat as Crazy Sally because you are unable to prove that an objective reality exists or that your perceptions correspond to it.

Delusion is just a word. It's not something out there. It's an opinion. Now we can agree upon a practical framework for treating people as though they were delusional, but when it comes down to it, it is an agreement, even when unspoken. It applies where there is agreement. Now you can take the term delusional, and apply the criteria used for judging an individual delusional in one setting in an area where it is not normally used, but don't expect people to accept your findings. That is what you are doing if you use the Crazy Sally criteria when assessing Theism. It amounts to little more than a word game, because few people accept the foundations upon which your judgements are based.

I'm leaving it at that, because my time is short and I think that there are threads that interest me more.

Full of Porn*

http://plainofpillars.blogspot.com

Back to top
Mr. Pessimistic Mr. Pessimistic has been starred
Assistant Professor
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar



Joined: 16 Jun 2004

Posts: 3449
Gender: Male
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:20 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
Quote:
given that we don't have direct access to reality


What is 'direct access' then? I would say our senses are pretty direct. I am a little tired of the totally made up assumption that somehow, we are so isolated from reality and that our senses are just not good enough!!

That is just a way to obfuscate any real inquiry into the world around us. It slaps doubt upon anything we can possibly present as evidence and keeps the door wide open for superstitious and religious ways.


I'm not saying it's usual for people to do those things but I(with the permission of God) have raised a dog from the dead and healed many people from all sorts of ailments. - Asana Boditharta (former booktalk troll)

The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.

What is all this shit about Angels? Have you heard this? 3 out of 4 people believe in Angels. Are you F****** STUPID? Has everybody lost their mind? - George Carlin

I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper

Back to top
Frank 013 Frank 013 has been starred
Beyond Awesome
BookTalk.org Moderator

Avatar



Joined: 08 Nov 2005

Posts: 1068
Gender: Male
Location: NY
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:48 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
Quote:
Niall
It applies where there is agreement. Now you can take the term delusional, and apply the criteria used for judging an individual delusional in one setting in an area where it is not normally used, but don't expect people to accept your findings. That is what you are doing if you use the Crazy Sally criteria when assessing Theism.


So we are back to the “it’s a common belief so it’s not delusional” defense, even though the criteria is the same as crazy sally’s.

It seems like the only ones playing slippery word games around here are the theists.

Later

Back to top
MadArchitect





Joined: 14 Nov 2004

Posts: 2609
Gender: Male
Location: decentralized
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:02 pm    Post subject: Re: If Theism isn\'t a Delusion, Then What Is It? Reply with quote
misterpessimistic: What is 'direct access' then?

In terms of the 4000 year old debate over epistemology, direct access is a requirement for knowing a thing as it is, not as it appears. All of our senses are indirect. Sight doesn't encompass the thing itself, but rather interprets the light reflected from an object. That involves several levels of removal from the object itself. For instance, if light is reflected from an object in an unaccustomed way (unaccustomed, that is, to us), then it may result in a distorted perception of the thing -- as with the foreshortening of an image viewed through water.

Another level of removal rests with the actual mechanism of our sensory organs. The eye receives images by use of a photo-sensitive chemical that reacts by producing a chemical signal to the brain. That signal can go wrong in a number of ways, and even when it's functioning properly, there are limitations to what it can receive and translate. Moreover, biologically speaking, it's a very specific tool -- not only is it only geared for one form of perception (you can't hear with your eye), but it's only geared for particular applications of that perception (eg. we can't see infrared, even though it's a visual phenomenon).

And at a third remove, all of our visual perceptions are conditioned at the cognitive level. We only see a chair because we've been culturally conditioned to recognize a thing as a chair. It's easy to see that at work with a cultural artifact like a chair, but it's debatable whether or not we'd intuitively arrive at a category like, say, red. In fact, other cultures categorize color in different ways, such that they'd find our distinction between green and blue difficult to understand without a great deal of practice.

Those are three levels of remove operative in every visual observation we make. That doesn't mean that sight is useless, but keeping these things in mind does check our hubris to some degree.

I am a little tired of the totally made up assumption that somehow, we are so isolated from reality and that our senses are just not good enough!!

They're patently not good enough for some tasks, and I think you'd recognize as much if you thought about it. If they were good enough, we wouldn't have had to extend our senses with the objects of scientific technology, like the microscope or the x-ray. And while those tools have been incredibly useful, we'd do well to remember that they put our senses at a further remove. If the naked eye is indirect to a power of three (because of the three removes I listed above) then an observation made through a microscope is indirect to a power of four. That's four levels at which things could go wrong.

The question implicit in this whole thread -- and to some degree, in this forum as a whole -- is whether or not there are some things that our senses, even extended by our tools, are insufficient to perceive with any confidence.

It slaps doubt upon anything we can possibly present as evidence and keeps the door wide open for superstitious and religious ways.

I'd say it's healthy to maintain some doubt. Without that doubt, the thing you consider knowledge moves closer and closer to being religion in its own right. I'm perfectly content in supposing that modern science is right about the evolutionary origin of humanity, but I don't hold it as certain beyond a doubt. And on a more personal level, I feel pretty safe in assuming that the floor of my second story apartment is as solid as it looks, but I still leave room for doubt on the matter.

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BookTalk.org Forum Index -> Archived Book Discussions 2006-2007 -> The God Delusion - by Richard Dawkins  
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2


 
Recent Topics
» Poem of the moment
by Grim on Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:21 pm

» Ch. 1: The Feeling of Knowing
by Robert Tulip on Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:57 pm

» How do Thoreau's words affect you personally?
by Thomas Hood on Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:27 pm

» Religion and Ecological Responsibility
by Dissident Heart on Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:56 pm

» Chapter 5. Solitude
by DWill on Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:53 pm

» What is Transcendentalism?
by WildCityWoman on Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:53 pm

» Chapter 4. Sounds
by Thomas Hood on Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:31 am

» Chapter 1. Economy
by DWill on Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:47 am

» Reasons 41 - 50
by Frank 013 on Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:16 am

» Suggestions for our next official fiction discussion
by Ophelia on Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:27 am




BookTalk.org Suggests


Imagine No Superstition: The Power to Enjoy Life With No Guilt, No Shame, No Blame by Stephen Frederick

Scheisshaus Luck: Surviving the Unspeakable in Auschwitz and Dora by Pierre Berg with Brian Brock

Beyond Reasonable Doubt by Geoff J. Henley

Palace Council by Stephen L. Carter

How to Get Rich as a Televangelist or Faith Healer by Bill Wilson

Silver: My Own Tale As Written by Me with a Goodly Amount of Murder by Edward Chupack

Rising Above The Influence: A True Story about Alcohol, Drugs, and Recovery by Stephen J. Della Valle

Are You Famous? Touring America with Alaska's Fiddling Poet by Ken Waldman

Additional Book Suggestions


Poll
Have you ever parked in a handicapped spot?

Yes [4]
No [15]

You must login to vote


BookTalk.org is a book discussion group, also known as a reading group or book club. We read and talk about non-fiction books, as a group. Live author chats where book group members can interact with and interview authors are common. We often give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys booktalk.  Booktalk is a free online reading group that features quality book reviews, resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. Non-fiction chat, book forum, literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today. Suggest nonfiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to plug their books or ask for an author chat or interview.

MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEABOUTBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSLINKSBLOGSFAQDONATECONTACT

BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
• On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton • 50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. Harrison • Walden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David Thoreau • Exile and the Kingdom by Albert Camus • Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are by Frans de Waal • Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year-History of the Human Body by Neil Shubin • No Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthy • The Age of American Unreason by Susan Jacoby • Ten Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David Haberman • Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad • The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature by Stephen Pinker • A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini • The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil by Philip Zimbardo • Responsibility and Judgment by Hannah Arendt • Interventions by Noam Chomsky • Godless in America by George A. Ricker • Religious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. Haiman • Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future by Phil McKibben • The God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals by Michael PollanI, Claudius : From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born 10 B.C., Murdered and Deified A.D. 54 by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? The Search for the Best Way to Live by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies: The Next Stage of History by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right by Al FrankenThe Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From the Big Bang To the 21st Century by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition into the Forces of Nature by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES
Baloney Detection KitBanned Book ListBook OrdersMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2008. All rights reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group