You are browsing the forum as a guest. Please log in or register to access additional features.
Online reading group and book discussion forum
  FORUMS ABOUT BOOKS VIDEOS TRANSCRIPTS LINKS BLOGS DONATE CONTACT  

     Log in   Register 


BookTalk.org News
• Only 4 members are currently signed up to receive email digests. Click on the digests link on the right at the top of every page to learn more. This is a great feature for keeping updated on forum activity.
• Regular casual chats are back on the menu! Check out the calendar for the schedule.

Links & Resources

Community Rules & Tips
For Authors & Publishers
Link to our old forum
Our Amazon.com Statistics
Book Suggestions
Rationally Speaking
Donations to BookTalk.org
FACTS Book Selections
BookTalk Forum Statistics
Games 170 FREE Games


Chat Room

Enter the BookTalk.org Chat Room

Enter our Chat Room

Nov. 2008 Chat Schedule
Dec. 2008 Chat Schedule
Jan. 2009 Chat Schedule


Featured Videos

Dan Barker
author of "Godless"
talks about his deconversion


Dan Barker's Deconversion

Andrew Bacevich
"The Limits of Power"

Andrew Bacevich on The Limits of Power

More Videos

Author Interviews


Featured Member Blogs

Ophelia's Blog
Lawrence's Blog
Penelope's Blog
Frank 013's Blog

- View all member Blogs
- See the latest Blog posts


Amazon Honor System
Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Donate to BookTalk.org

Please support BookTalk.org by making a small donation today!

Who supports us?


Related Links

Show us where you live!
BookTalk.org Member Map

Display Pagerank


Ethical Brain: Chapter 2


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BookTalk.org Forum Index -> Archived Book Discussions 2004-2005 -> The Ethical Brain - by Michael Gazzaniga
Author Message
Chris OConnor Chris OConnor has been starred
Rhodes Scholar
BookTalk.org Owner

Avatar

Usergroups: None


Joined: 05 May 2002


Posts: 7227

Thanks
Given: 39
Received: 11 in 10 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: Florida
us.gif



PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:42 pm    Post subject: Ethical Brain: Chapter 2 Reply with quote
This thread is for discussing Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain. You can post within this framework or create your own threads. ::228

Edited by: Chris OConnor  at: 11/1/05 12:30 am
Back to top
  Facebook it
Chris OConnor Chris OConnor has been starred
Rhodes Scholar
BookTalk.org Owner

Avatar

Usergroups: None


Joined: 05 May 2002


Posts: 7227

Thanks
Given: 39
Received: 11 in 10 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: Florida
us.gif



PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:11 am    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
I found some of the statistics in Ch. 2 rather fascinating. On pg. 23 Gazzaniga shows us how our bodies are living longer and longer, yet our brains aren't able to keep up to speed.

In 1900 only 4.1% of the population was over the age of 65.

By the middle of the century the percentage was up to 8%.

Soon it will reach 15%.


I'm curious how many people lived past 65 back in ancient Greece or Rome. Anyone have a clue?

Back to top
  Facebook it
tarav tarav has been starred
Stupendously Brilliant
BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar

Usergroups: None


Joined: 19 Jun 2003


Posts: 750

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Female
Location: NC


PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
The statistic I found that was disturbing is about the prevalence of Alzheimer's. On p 26 Gazzaniga reports that, "One in every four Americans over the age of 85 has Alzheimer's...". That is depressing. It makes living into your 80's a little scary. My brain deteriorating is the scariest thing to me. My life is so much about what I can do with my mind, rather than my body. I will engage in mental activity over physical activity any day! I know Gazzaniga says that along with your mental capacity, your cognition goes, but the people around you are still aware of what you're losing. I hope that something fatal goes wrong with some other part of my body, before dementia sets in. I know... such morbid thoughts...but remember, I did start by saying, "That is depressing"!

Back to top
  Facebook it
MadArchitect



Usergroups: None


Joined: 14 Nov 2004


Posts: 2609

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: decentralized
us.gif



PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
Chris, I can't think of any reasonable way to calculate the average life-span of an ancient Greek -- as far as I know, the Greeks didn't take a census, so we're left with very few records on the lifespan of the ancients. I can, however, point you to H.D.F. Kitto's consideration of the topic in his book "The Greeks". He compares the recorded life spans of ten famous Victorians to that of ten famous Greeks, and the Greeks come off comparatively better. Three lived into their nineties, and only one died younger than 70, at the tragically young age of 60. The average of those ten comes to 89.9.

There are a few qualifications to bear in mind, though. Those are famous Greeks, so the fact of their choice has some effect on the statistic we have in mind -- after all, those who die at an early age have fewer opportunities to arrive at fame. That said, amoung the famous Victorians with which Kitto compares them, four died in their 30s and one died at the age of 26, so it doesn't necessarily hold true that only the old are likely to become famous. But even assuming that the Greeks did live longer than the Victorians -- and perhaps as long, if not longer, than most modern Americans -- you have to bear in mind that they were living in an extremely temperate physical environment.

I had written a fairly in-depth post on this chapter, and I thought that I had posted and checked it, but it doesn't appear to be here anymore, so maybe I screwed up somewhere. Fortunately, I've been writing discussion notes in long hand, so I should be able to reproduce the basic points I wanted to make.

I'll try to get back to that in a minute.

Back to top
  Facebook it
MadArchitect



Usergroups: None


Joined: 14 Nov 2004


Posts: 2609

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: decentralized
us.gif



PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
Okay, my initial reactions to Chapter 2:

1. Does anyone else feel some misgivings about Gazzaniga's statement on page 27: "In some horrendous sense, they are no longer even members of our species, if being a member requires one to pass basic mental tests of competency"? Now, clearly Gazzaniga himself feels edgy about this point of view, but at the same time he does very little to discredit it. It seems like one of those gut reactions he mentions, but doesn't it require some corrective? It seems like a potentially unfortunate statement, one that could easily be prevailed upon by those looking to justify what we might otherwise regard as unethical behavior. If nothing else, it requires a hard and fast criteria for what standards we'll apply to the question of a subject's humanity, and I'm not sure that Gazzaniga has at all equipped us to address that question. Dementia patients, the mentally handicapped, victims of neurological trauma, the profoundly stupid -- it isn't at all a hypothetical question to ask where we draw the line. And at some point we have to get back to the basic question of why the question of humanness should hinge on mental capacity at all.

2. The last issue brings us to a more general observation, which is that Gazzaniga's opinion seems to be heavily influenced by the assumption of normitive states. The fully developed dementia case is not a normative state, but should that fact of its deviation from the norm render it susceptible to a difference in moral status? Even if "some sublime inner state" is unavailable to the Alzheimer's patient, are we justified in regarding them as less human? Eventually, the question has to be argued back to the point of who ought to be given the power to determine what are and are not the normative states, and how radically different a person must be to fall out of the protection of our ethical standards.

3. At least for the moment, Gazzaniga is right that "research on ageing that seeks eternal life is not the issue." (p. 30) The issue, it seems to me, is the control of life, and along with it, the control of death. Because, the more that evade the circumstances of a natural death, the more we're forced to consider the circumstances under which it is ethical to intentionally end life. What is a good death? And by extension, what is an unethical life -- that is, when is it unethical to continue living, or stickier still, to allow someone to live?

4. Methodological complaint: is Gazzaniga going to make a habit of justifying his opinions by analogy to inanimate objects? In the last chapter it was Home Depot; in this chapter it's "Nelly" the car. Such analogies function by allowing us to see human subjects as mere objects -- that will presumably allow us to view them without irrational biases -- but doesn't ethics begin by assuming that humans are somehow distinct as a class of objects? There's a serious danger, I think, in confusing the issue with analogies like these.

5. I've brought this point up in the euthanasia poll, but I'll bring it up here again. If society has an obligation to "allow a dignified method for ending life for those with terminal or totally debilitating diseases" (p. 33), shouldn't it also allow suicide under all circumstances? What about physical impairment confers on the desire to die a moral or ethical status that is denied to the otherwise healthy person?

6. Finally, I wanted to raise the question of how Gazzaniga's discussion of intent in the previous chapter plays into his ethical considerations in this chapter. Are they consistent or even compatible? For example, if, neurologically speaking, a senile demential patient could be viewed as equivalent to an early stage of embryonic development, how difficult would it be to rationalize an argument for performing scientific experiments on patients with a certain degree of mental deteriation, with or without a "living will" type declaration?

Back to top
  Facebook it
ginof ginof has been starred
Freshman
Bronze Contributor
Bronze Contributor



Usergroups: None


Joined: 01 Feb 2004


Posts: 208

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: San Francisco, CA
it.gif



PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Ethical Brain: Chapter 2 Reply with quote
p 20 - Can neuroscience tell us at what moment self-consciousness ends?

I don't think so: isn't this like asking what color is like to another person? We can all agree that red is red, but there is no way for me to know that you experience red the same way I do. Isn't self-consciousness the same kind of perception?

Back to top
  Facebook it
MadArchitect



Usergroups: None


Joined: 14 Nov 2004


Posts: 2609

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: decentralized
us.gif



PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Ethical Brain: Chapter 2 Reply with quote
Yeah, a lot probably depends on how you define self-consciousness or awareness. Science probably will come up with an answer to the question of when awareness ends, but in order to do so it may begin by redefining what that term means. This happens a lot in the sciences, and a lot of time we as laypersons tend to adopt the answers without really being aware that the terms of the question have changed.

Back to top
  Facebook it
ginof ginof has been starred
Freshman
Bronze Contributor
Bronze Contributor



Usergroups: None


Joined: 01 Feb 2004


Posts: 208

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: San Francisco, CA
it.gif



PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
Mad: Does anyone else feel some misgivings about Gazzaniga's statement on page 27: "In some horrendous sense, they are no longer even members of our species, if being a member requires one to pass basic mental tests of competency"?

When I first read the statement, I didn't have any issues with it. But in reading it in context and with your questions, I agree with your point. He hasn't given us the tools to make that judgement. Perhaps he's talking about those that are clearly way over the edge. Perhaps those completely unable to function are not truely human. However, I don't know that we would take away any rights they have as humans.

Back to top
  Facebook it
ginof ginof has been starred
Freshman
Bronze Contributor
Bronze Contributor



Usergroups: None


Joined: 01 Feb 2004


Posts: 208

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: San Francisco, CA
it.gif



PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:04 am    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
Mad: If society has an obligation to "allow a dignified method for ending life for those with terminal or totally debilitating diseases" (p. 33), shouldn't it also allow suicide under all circumstances? What about physical impairment confers on the desire to die a moral or ethical status that is denied to the otherwise healthy person?

While I don't buy the argument that allowing suicide for all detracts from us as humans, I do see logic in his statement. Specifically, he says it should be allowed for those with terminal or totally debilitating diseases. Unfortunately, those in qualify are usually suffering quite a bit of pain. Additionally, your 'normal' state today may not wish to deal with a 'abnormal' state tomorrow. I guess my thought experiment around this would be: If you knew that tomorrow you would no longer be able to communicate and you would die six months later, and during this 6 months you would be in a lot of pain, further, there was no chance of cure, would you want to die? I'm not sure, but I think I would. At the very least, many would seriously consider it.

Back to top
  Facebook it
tarav tarav has been starred
Stupendously Brilliant
BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor
Silver Contributor

Avatar

Usergroups: None


Joined: 19 Jun 2003


Posts: 750

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Female
Location: NC


PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
I caught the end of a docudrama that reminded me of this thread. A teenager with a terminal illness refuses to take his medicine since the medicine lessened his quality of life. He was taken from his mom when doctors realized the boy quit taking his pills. The boy went to court arguing that he'd rather live less days and enjoy the days he lives at home rather than take the pills(which caused horrible side-effects) to live more days miserably. The boy reiterated such a response even when the judge pointed out that there's a potential for the boy to have a change of heart and want to live as long as he can, regardless of the horrible side-effects induced by the pills. It certainly is a sad situation for all involved. I can understand the position of the boy. Is not taking the pills suicide? The boy will die without the pills. However, the boy will also die with taking the pills, eventually. If this is suicide, then should this action(or rather, inaction)be illegal? If you think the mom is the one responsible, then is this assisted suicide? If you think this is assisted suicide, then should this assisted suicide be illegal?

Back to top
  Facebook it
MadArchitect



Usergroups: None


Joined: 14 Nov 2004


Posts: 2609

Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts

Gender: Male
Location: decentralized
us.gif



PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Ch. 2 - The Aging Brain Reply with quote
ginof: Perhaps those completely unable to function are not truely human. However, I don't know that we would take away any rights they have as humans.

This seems to me a pretty worrisome line to tread. On the one hand, it provides some sort of theoretical foundation for terminating life in the case of patients with presumably no chance of recovery. On the other, it could also provide the theoretical foundation for sustaining unrecoverable cases so that they may be used for certain kinds of scientific experiementation. Assuming that we all share, if not the conviction, then at least the vague feeling, that such use would serve as an ethical breach, then we're obligated to reassess either 1) the idea that humanity can be determined by "certain standards of competency", or 2) the assertion that this conception of humanity should serve as the basis for ethics.

I guess my thought experiment around this would be: If you knew that tomorrow you would no longer be able to communicate and you would die six months later, and during this 6 months you would be in a lot of pain, further, there was no chance of cure, would you want to die? I'm not sure, but I think I would. At the very least, many would seriously consider it.

Looking at the extremes can distort the issue. Let's take a less extreme example. If told that, tomorrow, they would be paralyzed from the waist down, how many people would opt for suicide now, while they can still do it for themselves? Do we have any sort of moral obligation to attempt to prevent that?

Or another: a person is told that they will go irrecoverably blind within the week. That person plummet's into despair, making clear gestures towards a desire to kill themselves. Given that blindness is, for that person at least, an "abnormal" state, why should we feel any less inclined to prevent their suicide than we would in the case of a physically healthy 15 year old?

tarav: Is not taking the pills suicide?

I say no. Not taking the pills cannot be equated with an active desire or intention to die. In some sense, it's refusing intervention, but I'd say it's no more an act of suicide than is smoking, or eating poorly. These are all choices that, when considered, are likely to lessen a person's chances of dying, but they're not made in order to hasten death but rather out of other considerations.

These are the sort of decisions that we all make on a daily basis, and very few people choose longevity over "quality of life" on a consistent basis. The difference in the example you've cited seems, to me, to be a matter of quantity -- this boy can be more reasonably certain that his decision will shorten his life, whereas the rest of us can happily sustain the illusion that these decisions won't make much of a difference in the long run. And in the end, he's entitled to the same excuse that we make on a daily basis -- there are plenty of dangers which might precipitate his death before the disease ever kills him.

Further, I'd say that deciding to name this an instance of suicide would obligate the judge to consider other forms. Christian Science as a whole would have to be considered a philosophical stance promoting suicide. I don't endorse Christian Science, but neither would I say it particularly endorses suicide.

Back to top
  Facebook it
Display replies from:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BookTalk.org Forum Index -> Archived Book Discussions 2004-2005 -> The Ethical Brain - by Michael Gazzaniga  
Page 1 of 1


 
Recent Topics
» Atheists are my brothers and sisters of a different faith...
by Chris OConnor on Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:44 am

» Humbert Humbert in 2008
by Raving Lunatic on Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:35 am

» Mr. Pessimistic - Watch your head upon entering.
by Lawrence on Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:46 am

» Would you hire me?
by sweisser on Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:03 am

» Oh, how I despise ignorance....
by sweisser on Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:47 am

» Sarah Palin: Good, Bad or just the wrong choice?
by sweisser on Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:30 am

» OBAMA ELECTED
by sweisser on Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:11 am

» What do you do for a living?
by Grim on Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:32 am

» Official Poll - Dec. 2008 & Jan. 2009 Fiction Book
by Chris OConnor on Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:44 pm

» Sequel poems
by Saffron on Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:18 pm




BookTalk.org Suggests


The Spirit Man by Sean Murphy

Stupid Reasons People Die: An Ingenious Plot for Defusing Deadly Diseases by John Corso, M.D.

Wife In The North by Judith O'Reilly

Coyote's Guide to Connecting with Nature: For Kids of All Ages and Their Mentors by Young, Haas, McGown

The Myth of the Oil Crisis: Overcoming The Challenges of Depletion, Geopolitics, And Global Warming by Robin M . Mills


Additional Book Suggestions


Related Links

Poll
Do you plan to spend less this holiday season?

Yes [4]
No [2]

You must login to vote


BookTalk.org is a book discussion group, also known as a reading group or book club. We read and talk about non-fiction books, as a group. Live author chats where book group members can interact with and interview authors are common. We often give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys booktalk.  Booktalk is a free online reading group that features quality book reviews, resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. Non-fiction chat, book forum, literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today. Suggest nonfiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to plug their books or ask for an author chat or interview.

MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEABOUTBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSLINKSBLOGSFAQDONATECONTACT

BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power: The End of American ExceptionalismLolitaOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year-History of the Human Body by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals by Michael PollanI, Claudius : From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born 10 B.C., Murdered and Deified A.D. 54 by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? The Search for the Best Way to Live by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies: The Next Stage of History by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right by Al FrankenThe Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From the Big Bang To the 21st Century by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition into the Forces of Nature by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES
Baloney Detection KitBanned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections