Re: Epistemology and Biblical Evidence
You misunderstand me. I'm sure it's a documented phenomenon. Which means it's possible that such a thing could have happened in the way the bible says. The difference is, showing that something is possible is not the same thing as showing that it happened. That is non-sequitur. (It's possible that a tiger killed Amelia Earhardt, but that doesn't mean it happened. Additional evidence is required to support the truthfulness of the story.) You need corroborating evidence. You've already done everything in your power here, there's no need to resurrect this thread.
Tweet This Topic
