Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:49 am

<< Week of November 28, 2014 >>
Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
28 Day Month

29 Day Month

30 Day Month

1 Day Month

2 Day Month

3 Day Month

4 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
No Bell Prize Winner


Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1298
Thanks: 518
Thanked: 484 times in 368 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
lol!!!

No, Robert Tulip is the discussion leader, an Aussie living on the other side of the world. I'm a moderator from DM Murdocks http://www.freethoughtnation.com forums living in Florida along with many of the other BT members. I just wondered if my screen name registered with you or not. It's from the Upanishads and the forest philosophy close in doctrine of "tat tvam asi", which is sankrit for "thou art that" / "you are it". I picked it up from Joseph Campbell's comparative mythology books and lectures. That ultimate mystery (the great unknown) which is the source, end, and supporting ground of all life and being, is not separate from anything in existence. I found this close in doctrine to hold some powerful truths. Everything that exists is grounded in deep mystery. And the point is that the most you can possibly know, is that ultimately you do not know. That is true "knowing."

"He who thinks he knows doesn't know. He who knows he doesn't know, knows." - Aristotle

lol!!!

What do you know about CiE by the way a gnostic?


_________________
A) The Origins of Religious Worship

B) The Christmas Nativity

C) The Mythicist Position

D) YEC theory put to rest!


Last edited by tat tvam asi on Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.



The following user would like to thank tat tvam asi for this post:
Vishnu
Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:06 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Pop up Book Fanatic


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
tat tvam asi wrote:
lol!!!

No, Robert Tulip is the discussion leader, an Aussie living on the other side of the world. I'm a moderator from DM Murdocks http://www.freethoughtnation.com forums living in Florida along with many of the other BT members. I just wondered if my screen name registered with you or not. It's from the Upanishads and the forest philosophy close in doctrine of "tat tvam asi", which is sankrit for "thou art that" / "you are it". I picked it up from Joseph Campbell's comparative mythology books and lectures. That ultimate mystery (the great unknown) which is the source, end, and supporting ground of all life and being, is not separate from anything in existence. I found this close in doctrine to hold some powerful truths. Everything that exists is grounded in deep mystery. And the point is that the most you can possibly know, is that ultimately you do not know. That is true "knowing."

"He who thinks he knows doesn't know. He who knows he doesn't know, knows." - Aristotle

lol!!!

What do you know about CiE by the way a gnostic?


I am not familiar with CiE, but I will check it out. You are so right. The more we know the more we become confronted with what we do not know. The eastern religions do not interest me. The west is messed up enough. I have published "Decoding the Gospel of Thomas." Right now my focus is on the Egyptian, Jesus, quantum physics connection. Because my book is not selling I decided to try again and see if I can do better and hopefully find a legitimate publisher. I published POD and do not have the funds to promote it. Actually I recently down loaded DM Murdocks book and signed up for her news letter. It is from that I got caught up in this discussion. In Thomas I do focus a lot on the Jesus, Egypt connection. Thomas is a collection of 114 mystic sayings of Jesus. As an example; saying 7. "Jesus said, 'Sacred is the lion which becomes man when eaten by a man, and cursed is the man whom the lion consumes and the lion becomes man." The man is the spiritual man and the lion is his animal body. One will eventually over come the other and the person becomes either spiritual or materialist. This also solves the riddle of the Sphinx. The mans head controlling the lion body. Now that I have been able to take time to go deeper into physics I see a third connection and will attempt to lock the three together. With this I really need to get back to work. I am 83 and times a'waisting.

Peace



Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:12 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
No Bell Prize Winner


Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1298
Thanks: 518
Thanked: 484 times in 368 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
I'm sure you'd do well to give CiE a good read.

And I'll also point you into an interesting direction concerning you're interest with quantum physics in relation to ancient myths:

http://www.amazon.com/Hidden-Meanings-L ... 1401088767

http://www.alibris.com/search/books/qwo ... 20Meanings

I read things like this for fun because watching people connect so many dots can be interesting, regardless of whether or not it's completely true or not. But if Scranton has discovered something valid, well then it opens up a world of mystery concerning when, where, why, and how this stuff became embedded into the founding symbols of civilization, which, continued to evolve right down into the Jewish and Christian writings era's and on through the dark and middle ages to present day. I'm sure you'll be blown away by Scranton's personal research if you give this book (and his following books) a good read sometime.


_________________
A) The Origins of Religious Worship

B) The Christmas Nativity

C) The Mythicist Position

D) YEC theory put to rest!


Last edited by tat tvam asi on Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:29 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
No Bell Prize Winner


Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1298
Thanks: 518
Thanked: 484 times in 368 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
On to the astrotheology of Isis, Mary, and Virgo...

Quote:
p.156-157

As we have seen, the holy mysteries of the virgin birth and virginity restoration / perpetuation existed not only among the Greeks and Jews but also in Egypt, concerning both Neith and Isis, among others. The identification of Isis with the Virgin, in fact is further made in an ancient Greek text called The Katasterismoi, or Catasterismi, allegedly written by the astronomer Eratosthenes (276-194 BCE), who was for some 50 years the head librarian of the massive Library of Alexandria. Although the original of this text has been lost, an "epitome" credited to Eratosthenes in ancient times has been attributed by modern scholars to an anonymous "Psuedo-Eratosthenes" of the 1st to 2nd centuries AD/CE. In this book, the title of which translates as "Placing Among the Stars," appear discussions of the signs of the zodiac. In his essay on the zodiacal sign of Virgo (ch.9), under the heading of "Parthenos," the author includes the goddess Isis, among others, such as Demeter, Atagartis and Tyche, as identified with and as the constellation of the Virgin. In Star Myths of the Greeks and Romans, Dr. Theony Condos of the American University of Armenia translates the pertinent passage from the chapter "Virgo" by Psuedo-Eratosthenes thus:

Hesiod in the Theogony says this figure is Dike, the daughter of Zues [Dios] and Themis... Some say it is Demeter because of the sheaf of grain she holds, other say it is Isis, other Atagartis, others Tyche... and for that reason they represent her as headless.

The headlessness of the goddess / constellation is interesting in consideration of the story that Isis too was at some point decapitated. This, in ancient times Isis was identified the constellation of Virgo, the Virgin. In fact, as we know well, much of the myth surrounding Osiris, Isis, and Horus appears the theme of the constellation of the Virgin giving birthto the baby sun at the winter solstice, long before the Christian era and likely serving as one source for the nativity story of Jesus Christ.

In fact that the Virign Mary herself is associated with the constellation of Virgo becomes evident from the placement of her "ascension into heaven," called the "Assumption of the Virgin Mary," on August 15th, representing one of the four greatest religious festivals in France, for one. Christians believe that this date reflects the time when the mortal Mary ascended or was assumed into heaven. However, the fixation on this date of the supposedly mortal Mary's assumption is quite obviously a reflection of an ancient observance of the assumption of the constellation of Virgo during the time when the sun god "absorbs the celestial virgin in his fiery course, and she disappears in the midst of the luminous rays and the glory of her son." Concerning this event, Sir Rev. Jacob Youde William Lloyd (1816-1887) relates:

The Roman Calendar of Columella (Col. lii, cap. ii, p.429) marks the death or disappearance of Virgo on the thirteenth day before the Kalends of September, that is, on the 15th of August; and on this day the ancient Greeks and Romans fix the Assumption of Astraea, who is the same as Isis. At the end of the three weeks or thereabouts, the Calendar notes the birth of the virgin Isis, or her release from the solar rays. On the third day before the Ides, that is the 8th of September, it says the middle of Virgo rises, so that the same constellation, which is born on the 8th of September, presides at midnight on the 25th of December over the birth of the sun...

The ancient Roman calender of Columella dates to around 65 AD/CE and does indeed discuss the assumption of the constellation of Virgo, on the precise date centuries later ascribed to Mary's assumption in the Christian mythos. The Greek goddess Astraea was a daughter of Zues who, after her ascension into heaven, became Virgo.


This is something that most people have never confronted in any direct "aha" sort of way. The same is true of the beheading of John the Baptist. Many of these myths are fixed to specific dates due to what can be observed up in the sky between the heavenly bodies motions during that day or time period. These are clearly not based first on real historical events or supernatural miracles taking place on the earth. It's the other way around actually. What takes place in the sky is then worked into the surface storyline of a given mythology so as to align society below with what is taking place in the heavens above. There's nothing spooky, supernatural, or magical about any of this in reality. It really is nothing more than an observation, by human sky watching priests and religious leaders, who then arranged and oriented their mythic tales to correspond with natural observation. This is clearly a running theme in mythology and one that is very much present in the Judeo-Christian myths, as they sought to use the same priestcraft techniques while devising their own social structure mythologies. They learned much from other the priesthoods of the region and it shows when confronting the Judeo-Christian mythos on these terms.

I'd like to press along some more into the chapter "Other Virgin Mothers":
Quote:
p.159-160

As previously demonstrated, Neith and Isis are not the only pre-Christian and non-Christian virgin mothers, and their offspring are not the sole products of the a virgin or miraculous birth... The Greek myth of the virgin Danae being impregnated by Zues as a "golden shower" - essentially sunlight, which could be deemed the "breath of heavenly fire" - and giving birth to the divine son, Perseus, is referred to by the Christian apologist Justin Martyr (100-165 AD/CE), in his comparison of Christianity with pre-Christian myth. In Dialogue with Trypho (66), in his defense of Christ's virgin birth, Justin says:

...in the fables of those who are called Greeks, it is written that Perseus was begotten of Danae, who was a virgin; he who was called among Zues having descended on her in the form of a golden shower.

In chapter 22 of his First Apology, Justin reiterates the comparison between Christ's birth and that of Perseus:

And if we even affirm that He was born of a virgin, accept this in common with what you accept of Perseus.

In this same regard, ancient skeptic Celsus (2nd cent. AD/CE) remarked; "Clearly the Christians have used the myths of the Danae and Melanippe, or of the Auge and the Antilope in fabricating the story of Jesus' virgin birth."

In chapter 54 of the same apology, Justin basically accuses the "heathens" of plagiarizing the Old Testament "prophecy" at Isaiah 7:14:

...And when they heard it said by the other prophet Isaiah, that He should be born of a virgin, and by His own means ascend into heaven, they pretended that Perseus was spoken of.

This scripture at Isaiah 7:14 refers to a "maiden" giving birth to one named "God is with us" or Emmanuel who has been interpreted in Christian tradition to be a "virgin," i.e., Mary, bringing forth Jesus. Indeed, the author of the gospel of Matthew (1:23) copies this passage in the Septuagint verbatim. Furthermore, the argument about the "prophecy" at Isaiah 7:14 is specious, because the original Hebrew term of "maiden" is almah, which means "young women" but not necessarily a virgin. As noted, the Hebrew term of "virgin" is Bethulah. This example provides an important instance where facts have been twisted by fervent Christian proselytizers in attempts to validate their faith. In Trypho (70), Justin comes up with the infamous Christian excuse for the existence of these various themes in pre-Christian mythology - "the devil got there first!":

...And when I hear, Trypho," said I, "that Perseus was begotten of a virgin, I understand that the deceiving serpent counterfeited also this."

Thus, as we can see, in order to explain the presence of the virgin birth in so-called Pagan mythology, Justin, along with other Church fathers, argued both that the Pagans plagiarized the Old Testament and that the Devil, knowing Christ would be born of a virgin, planted the idea in the heads of the pre-Christians. Nowhere does this early Church father suggest that the Pagans plagiarized from Christianity, and it is quite evident that virgin-birth motif is pre-Christian and therefore neither unique nor any more "historical" with Christianity than these other, mythical narratives.


_________________
A) The Origins of Religious Worship

B) The Christmas Nativity

C) The Mythicist Position

D) YEC theory put to rest!


The following user would like to thank tat tvam asi for this post:
D.M. Murdock
Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:42 am
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Almost Comfortable


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 19
Thanks: 8
Thanked: 45 times in 18 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
The Egyptian Virgin Mother Goddess

Thanks for the deep discussion again, folks.

I wanted to chime in here with some comments and clarifications about Isis being a Virgin Mother and the general concept of the Virgin Mother in antiquity. When one understands the concept of parthenogenesis or "virgin birth" in mythology dating back thousands of years, it should not be difficult to comprehend how Isis is yet another incarnation of the ages-old Parthenogenetrix/Virgin Mother.

As essentially proved by Dr. Marguerite Rigoglioso in her book Virgin Mothers of Antiquity, long before Christianity came up with the notion of the "Virgin Mary" there were numerous goddesses likewise perceived, stemming from the general concept of a Goddess or female Divine Creator who creates out of herself, without external influence or male consort.

The Egyptian Goddess Neith

The Egyptian goddess Neith is evidently some 7,000 years old and is a direct predecessor of Isis. Concerning Neith, Rigoglioso (2010) relates:

Quote:
...Neith was unequivocally portrayed as an autogenetic/ parthenogenetic creatrix in the inscriptions of the middle and late periods in Egypt, a depiction that may have characterized the goddess in her earliest cult as well. She specifically was both creator and "virgin," a being whose peplos, or dress, no one had lifted. As one of the oldest deities of Egypt, who most likely was worshipped throughout ancient Libya, she thus represents one of the earliest appearances of the archetype of the Virgin Mother goddess in the ancient Mediterranean world. (23)

It is important in discussing Neith as autogene, or self-created Virgin Mother...first to establish her preeminence in the Egyptian pantheon. Neith...was one of the oldest of all Egyptian deities and one of the most important divinities during the early historic period. There is strong evidence that her worship was widespread in predynastic times... She is first documented iconographically in the last phase of the predynastic period (c. fourth millennium B.C.E.)... (26)

As a divinity of the First Principle, Neith was an autogenetic goddess who, in the ultimate mystery, created herself out of her own being. Budge notes...that an inscription on a statue of Utchat-Heru, a high priest of Neith, relates that she "was the first to give birth to anything, and that she had done so when nothing else had been born, and that she had herself never been born." We see her autogenetic aspect echoed in both Egyptian and Greek texts. Plutarch...refers to an inscription on her statue in Sais...: "I am everything that has been, and that is, and that shall be, and no one has ever lifted my garment (peplos)."... That in the above-noted Saitic inscription Neith's "garment" remained perpetually "unlifted" is also a sexual reference... The inscription therefore communicates that Neith never engaged in any kind of sexual union; that is, she was eternally a virgin. Yet, as the primordial Being, she was also generative. Thus, in Neith we have one of the earliest appearances of the archetype of the Virgin Mother, the Holy Parthenos, in her original, unadulterated form. (29-30)

As we can see, the motif of a Divine Female birthing the cosmos without a male consort is firmly established as very ancient.

Isis as Divine Parthenogenetic Creatrix

Fast forward to Isis, and we discover that she is a form of Neith and shares the same attribute of being a Virgin Mother, evident from various artifacts that predate the Christian era by centuries and millennia, as I demonstrate in my article "Isis is a Virgin Mother."

As stated by Egyptologist Dr. Reginald E. Witt, In Isis in the Ancient World:

Quote:
The Egyptian goddess who was equally "the Great Virgin" (hwnt) and "Mother of the God" was the object of the very same praise bestowed upon her successor [Mary, Virgin Mother of Jesus].

One of the inscriptions that calls Isis the "Great Virgin" appears in the temple of Seti I at Abydos dating to the 13th century BCE. As stated by professor of Old Testament and Catholic Theology at the University of Bonn Dr. G. Johannes Botterweck, in the Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament:

Quote:
..The Pyramid Texts speak of "the great virgin" (hwn.t wr.t) three times (682c, 728a, 2002a...); she is anonymous, appears as the protectress of the king, and is explicitly called his mother once (809c). It is interesting that Isis is addresseed as hwn.t in a sarcophagus oracle that deals with her mysterious pregnancy. In a text in the Abydos Temple of Seti I, Isis herself declares: "I am the great virgin."...

It should be noted that the king or pharaoh, whose mother is called "the great virgin," is also the living Horus; hence, his great virgin mother would be Isis.

Also, as noted by Rigoglioso above, in the temple of Neith and Isis at Sais was an ancient inscription that depicted the virgin birth of the sun:

Quote:
The present and the future and the past, I am. My undergarment no one has uncovered. The fruit I brought forth, the sun came into being.

As Dr. Botterweck also writes:

Quote:
In the Late Period [712-332 BCE] in particular, goddesses are frequently called "(beautiful) virgins," especially Hathor, Isis, and Nephthys.

Also, there exists at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York an ancient Carnelian ring stone from the Imperial period (1st-2nd cents. AD/CE) that is an "adaptation" of a Greek artifact from the fourth century BCE. The ring stone possesses an image of the Greco-Egyptian hybrid god Serapis-Hades and Isis standing before him holding an "ear of wheat and the sistrum." The Greek inscription reads:

Quote:
The Lady Isis Immaculate

The phrase is translated as "The Lady Isis, Immaculate," the latter word from the Greek verb agneuw, meaning "to be pure or chaste."

Image

There is much more to this story, obviously, which is why in Christ in Egypt I dedicated some 77 pages to this subject of "The Virgin Mother Isis-Mery." The bottom line is that the concept of a Virgin Mother predates Christianity by thousands of years. It should be further noted that from remote antiquity this Divine Mother was apparently often called "Mari," as in Southern India, Phoenicia and among the Basques, to name a few. Hence, we can see that the Christian "Virgin Mary" concept is derivative from ancient myth, not a "unique and divine revelation" about a "real person."



The following user would like to thank D.M. Murdock for this post:
tat tvam asi
Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:26 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5602
Location: California
Thanks: 753
Thanked: 1482 times in 1172 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
Lack of virginity is seen as all too human, a corruptive characteristic in some more misogynistic systems. Perhaps fueled by the greed of pleasure-seeking men, virginity is a much sought after attribute. Based on this stratification, where virginity is valued much higher than its alternative, it follows that men would consider gods coming from virgins. I mean, it's a recombination of ideas that you'd reasonably expect to see develop, knowing how the human mind works. I did a quick search for virgin births and found a dozen or more pre-dating Christianity.

Immaculate conception is one recombination further, combing the idea of original sin with the virgin birth. I only mention it because it fits thematically with the recombination of ideas(a key process in the development of religion.)

It seems that Neith is representative of the dilemma about the chicken or the egg, or at least represents an answer to that dilemma, created by the ancients:

Quote:
Budge notes...that an inscription on a statue of Utchat-Heru, a high priest of Neith, relates that she "was the first to give birth to anything, and that she had done so when nothing else had been born, and that she had herself never been born."


I could see philosophical ideas being resolved by the invention of stories. An unanswered problem irritates the mind. We desire answers instead of loose ends. That long ago, there were no Aristotle's or Hume's or Kant's for us to piggyback on. I'm sure in many minds, stories were valid answers. Especially when told by someone else, and told in a truthful context.

What came first, the human or the infant? The answer is Neith(er). HA!



The following user would like to thank Interbane for this post:
D.M. Murdock, tat tvam asi
Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:46 pm
Profile
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Permanent Ink Finger


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 2 times in 2 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
The explanation never given is very simple. The Great virgin is the moon! It has to do with the Creation Process of Earth originally. It was the sun and moon, the right and left eye of God that were the waters above that are in the creation. The actual understanding was that the Earth was brought forth on the third day by Moonlight Only! As the moon was the left eye, and so a goddess to the Ancients, it was considered a Virgin Birth. The whole understanding of what we call genesis is based on a natural process, and the six days are about six time periods of this goddess in each hemisphere. This creation process was used and with "Art" it was found that matter could be perfected. That adaption of the process became the religion of Osiris. The moon became isis, his mother in the religion. Horus his son became the Sun! As matter lives and dies, and by this process can be resurrected Perfect, it was assumed that the way of perfecting man had been found. And so, all our customs about death also became from this process. As it took 16 months for this process to work, the stars above were linked to it and so, astrology! Everything is from a 16 month process unknown by our scholars, and evidently it will remain so. This process is very old, and was known world wide. As something happened in our past, it was remembered in many places, but in each it was changed probably because of which parts were remembered. As for the Virgin birth, originally it was in September, under the constellation, Virgo the Virgin! If you will check all that is tied to ancient Egypt during September, you will know this is True.

Al



Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:40 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Pop up Book Fanatic


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked: 9 times in 6 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Netherlands (nl)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
I have already mentioned it before, but I like to do it again. I have to use capitals to avoid you feel the need to point out to me that Jesus en Mary didn't exist at all. That however is not my point and not even relevant. For me it is a story, nothing else. The STORY exists and there are even people who believe it is true. I was never a christian and the whole concept is absurd. Even my daughter, who heard the story for the first time at school, came home and asked me how people could believe such nonsense - she was 10 years old at the time.
But now to my point.
In the STORY of Jesus and Mary, they are both human beings. The character Jesus is the son of a girl named Mary, who is not married but accompanied by man. So Mary might have been a minor (she has a chaperone), which means she was a maiden. In my language MAIDEN = MAAGD and MAAGD = VIRGIN. But of course that is in my language. The idea is that girls who are not married are virgins ;-) Of course if such a girl has a baby, nobody believes that anymore - but perhaps Christians do? ;-)
Anyway, the STORY goes that Mary has a child and there is no father. She goes to another place to have the child, which was still custom in the 18th en 19th century (I am a genealogist). Jesus had no father, so he calls God his father. The storytellers make this a FACT. They had to hide the fact that, if it were REAL, Jesus must have had an unknown father. So they made Mary a REAL virgin and Jesus was born from a virgin, making him GODLIKE. Next step was to make this "real person" a God but that is another part of the STORY.
And this is the point I like to make: Can you mention ANY HUMAN in mythology who was a VIRGIN? All the virgin mothers were GODDESSES and not HUMAN.
For me this is the strongest point of the Jesus/Mary story being Bogus and stupid as well.



The following user would like to thank drdalet for this post:
Robert Tulip
Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:22 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4246
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1170
Thanked: 1224 times in 920 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
drdalet wrote:
Can you mention ANY HUMAN in mythology who was a VIRGIN? All the virgin mothers were GODDESSES and not HUMAN.
For me this is the strongest point of the Jesus/Mary story being Bogus and stupid as well.


My view on this is that the power of Christianity arose from its mutation of Egyptian mythology with the novel device of incarnation. By asserting that its myths were literal history, with gods as actual humans, Christianity achieved an unrivalled social impetus. Judaism had set the tone with its mythic historical characters, but Christianity took this method to a whole new level. The absurdity of its claims was secondary to their social appeal. That is always the way with evolution - success depends only on being the best at adapting to circumstances. In the context of the extreme scale of Roman imperialism, military opposition was futile, whereas a mutation of mythology into specific claims of miraculous history obviously gained immense purchase.

At the moment I am reading a really interesting book Susan Sorek: The Jews Against Rome. The truly bizarre thing in this book is that she notes that the history of Palestine in the first century was one of the most documented periods in the ancient world, but none of the early sources make any credible mention of Jesus Christ. It is as if he did not even exist! Try reading The Jewish War by Josephus, or Legatio by Philo. Ask how much of the Gospels must be false for these guys never to have heard of any of it.



Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:40 am
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
No Bell Prize Winner


Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1298
Thanks: 518
Thanked: 484 times in 368 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
Quote:
Can you mention ANY HUMAN in mythology who was a VIRGIN? All the virgin mothers were GODDESSES and not HUMAN.
For me this is the strongest point of the Jesus/Mary story being Bogus and stupid as well.

The writers were trying to tie in the Jesus myth to the Jewish scriptures. The idea was to have Jesus coming from the line of King David, descended from Abraham, and Noah, and Adam. That's why Mary is a human being in the myth, a woman descended from Adam, while serving the role of the virgin mother goddesses of antiquity.

If you're reading CiE then you'll find that much of this myth appears to have descended from Graeco-Jewish origins based around Alexandria Egypt and spread throughout the "collegia" around the Roman Empire. The idea was to blend Judaism with Hellenized thinking. So what comes from that is a mythology that reads as historical, such as the Jewish mythology reads.


_________________
A) The Origins of Religious Worship

B) The Christmas Nativity

C) The Mythicist Position

D) YEC theory put to rest!


Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:15 am
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Almost Comfortable


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 19
Thanks: 8
Thanked: 45 times in 18 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
Thanks for the ongoing lively discussion of this fascinating subject.

The Virgin Mother as Moon Goddess

Regarding the virgin-mother status of Isis and other goddesses, another poster remarks:

Quote:
The explanation never given is very simple. The Great virgin is the moon!

Actually, I give this simple explanation of the Goddess throughout my works, including at this link here:

Who is the Virgin Mother? Queen of Heaven

I have also alternatively titled that article, "Moon Mary: Queen of Heaven."

This lunar symbolism attached to Isis was expressed by Plutarch during the 2nd century AD/CE, obviously based on an earlier tradition. In his Moralia (52, 372D), Plutarch states that "there are those who declare that Isis is none other than the Moon." I discuss this fact of Isis's lunar significance in Christ in Egypt as well, on pp. 28, 228, et al.

Isis's synthesis with the moon is a later adaptation, apparently based on Greek influence, since the Greek religion/mythology frequently attaches lunar significance to the goddess archetype. However, prior to that time Isis actually possessed solar attributes, like so many other deities. Nevertheless, before the rise of solar mythology that accompanied the development of agriculture, stellar and lunar astrotheology were the main focus of many peoples globally, so it would not surprise us to find very ancient lunar attributes attached to various deities as well, including Osiris, whose dismemberment into 14 pieces represents the lunar phenomenon of monthly waning. Yet, the virgin-mother motif is not simply lunar or solar but also cosmic, as explained very well by Dr. Marguerite Rigoglioso, cited in my article about Isis's alter-ego Neith. The virgin mother also represents the earth itself, as in the story of Demeter and Persephone or Kore, both of whom were said to have reproduced parthenogenetically.

In any event, it is wise to look for a variety of meanings behind various myths, as well as to realize that these popular and ubiquitous archetypes were clearly used in the creation of the Christian story. And yes, we do realize that the creators of the Christ myth put a heavy emphasis on making the tale appear to be a literal and "historical" story with real "human" figures. This type of "reverse euhemerism/evemerism" making a god into a person is not uncommon, however, as it can be found in mythology around the world, including with such mythical figures as Hercules, Dionysus, Osiris, Quetzalcoatl, Viracocha and many more - all of these figures have been believed to have been "real people," i.e., humans, and several of them, including Dionysus and Quetzalcoatl were said to have been born of virgins. So too were several figures who were indeed real people, such as Alexander and Plato, deemed to have been born of miraculous or virgin births.

As J.G.R. Forlong states:

Quote:
The legend of the virgin birth was at least as old as the 2nd century A.C. among Christians; but Buddha, Zoroaster, Plato, Alexander, and even Tartar emperors and Pharaohs, were called the children of virgins by some god...

Image



Last edited by D.M. Murdock on Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.



The following user would like to thank D.M. Murdock for this post:
Chris OConnor, tat tvam asi
Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:43 am
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Pop up Book Fanatic


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked: 9 times in 6 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Netherlands (nl)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
tat tvam asi wrote:
Quote:
Can you mention ANY HUMAN in mythology who was a VIRGIN? All the virgin mothers were GODDESSES and not HUMAN.
For me this is the strongest point of the Jesus/Mary story being Bogus and stupid as well.

The writers were trying to tie in the Jesus myth to the Jewish scriptures. The idea was to have Jesus coming from the line of King David, descended from Abraham, and Noah, and Adam. That's why Mary is a human being in the myth, a woman descended from Adam, while serving the role of the virgin mother goddesses of antiquity.

If you're reading CiE then you'll find that much of this myth appears to have descended from Graeco-Jewish origins based around Alexandria Egypt and spread throughout the "collegia" around the Roman Empire. The idea was to blend Judaism with Hellenized thinking. So what comes from that is a mythology that reads as historical, such as the Jewish mythology reads.


I totally agree. That is exactly how I read CiE. Somehow the religion was trying to consolidate all the religions present at that complicated part of the world, where Egyptian, Roman, Greek and Jewish mythology met.
What sets Jewish myth apart from all others (and why it became the base for the christian myth) is that it mixes real history with fabricated history AND mythology. In Egypt, Rome and Greece people had their own favorite god, but the Hebrews had one and it united them. And for them it was REALITY.
"What a wonderfull concept", the creators of christianity must have thought. :mrgreen: "Why can't we do the same and create a story based on elements that are historical, like places and people, and add other elements the Egyptians, Romans and Greek people would accept as a new religion".
"So enters: Jesus - a kind of Robin Hood, based on several real people that were fighting for Jewish freedom from the Romans - who is a child of a God and a human - like the Greek semi-gods". "Let's spice it with Egyptian "flavours", and sell it to the people". "And make it REAL, so it will win people over".
(Maybe it wasn't delibirately thought out this way, but that's what happened)
The Romans and Greeks were the first to adopt Christianity and THEY believed in semi-gods, so they could easily believe that a God could impregnate a woman who was still a Virgin.

The concept of mixing reality with faked reality and mythology is strong. Not only in Christianity, but also in Islam which came 500 plus years after that and is also a fictional "Real Live" soap opera.

The idea was not knew. The Hebrews were there before. According to their own books, they lived in Egypt for 400 years. They might have mixed their own religious ideas (perhaps related to Sumerian religion - Genesis) with Egyptian mythology and made it their own (Genesis-Exodus). However they didn't do it to consolidate, but to distinguish themselves from all others, espescially the Egyptians. That's why egyptian mythology is well hidden, but still there. According to ancient-hebrew.org the Hebrew language shows that the Hebrews were concrete thinkers and the language does not point to abstract thought. This must have obscured the Egyptian and Sumerian philosophies and burried them in the Jewish religious stories, told as historical events.

In my mind, Islam is a continuation of the jewish religion, but christianity is a branch off this semitic stream of thought, more related to the Greek and Roman school of thought.
Like Jews, muslims also set themselves apart from all others. They are bound to be the greatest enemies of each other. Christians are dangerous, because they like to consolidate and can easily become victims of Islam, like so many people before.

What I appreciate in CiE is the dis-covering of the real meaning behind the stories. Going to the roots of the religion and trying to understand where it came from. And the beautifull thing is that once you are back in Egypt and look at all the other religions that were out there, you notice that they were quite similar and actually astrotheological. It's a wonderfull book.



The following user would like to thank drdalet for this post:
D.M. Murdock, Interbane, tat tvam asi
Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:03 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5602
Location: California
Thanks: 753
Thanked: 1482 times in 1172 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
Quote:
I totally agree. That is exactly how I read CiE. Somehow the religion was trying to consolidate all the religions present at that complicated part of the world, where Egyptian, Roman, Greek and Jewish mythology met.


I just made a post about the harmonization of science and religion. The idea applies here a bit, I think. It's noble to try and unify different understandings. From harmonizing religion to finding the ToE(theory of everything). Many different fields have their own variant of attempted Grand Unification Theories.

I can see the ancients having this same motive. They wished to harmonize all the data that was incoming. There is no need to consider their efforts as "creating a false story". Instead, they considered each story to be representative of "something" true, even though they may not have any idea what that something is. The parts which are selected would be memetically sticky. Ideas that remain in the brain, concepts that "click" with you. Recombination of various religious elements would be a natural output of this process.

This makes even more sense when you consider the status of knowledge of the time. They had very little to work with, and each idea was a shot in the dark. With our overflowing portfolio of knowledge allowing us a god's eye view of the past, it's easy to be intellectually condescending to those who sought truth in religion. But to be perfectly honest, I could see myself being such a person, if I lacked much of my current knowledge.



Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:29 pm
Profile
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Permanent Ink Finger


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 2 times in 2 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
To anyone that reads G. Massey it should be evident that in the past there was a One world Religion. On page after page Massey will show the similarities of different peoples from different parts of the world. How can this be if not something in the past that tied them together. Egypt and this religion is very old. Myself I would say 10K years old at least. What is not known by almost everyone is what was the Original Religion based on? The past is one big secret. But the information of that Secret was carried to us by what we call alchemists. There is, Archarya, a 16 month process that is about perfecting matter. I found after 20 some years of investigation. Now, after 40 years there is still more to learn. The information is alchemy as we have termed it. It is about Perfecting Matter using just the forces in nature. This process when known is a duplicate of the religion of Osiris. and so it is a duplicate of Christianity. Yes, Jesus like Osiris is tied to this process. Alchemy is what the Myth is all about. also, the word definitions tied to the constellations follow this process, and so astrology as we know it is also from that process. every religious term is from that understanding. Baptism is from that process, or, almost everything talked about is from alchemy, known to Jesus as. "The Magic of Egypt." That is stated in the gnostics, "Jesus went to Egypt to learn the Magic'! Where was Jesus from the ages of 12 to 30? I would say that is when he was in Egypt, learning the Magic. He had a teacher, I have had to find everything myself.

The alchemists, look them up, were almost every person of our past that was noted for some reason. If you knew the process, you would see that all of them also knew this process, and brought it forward by what they said and did. If that is a True statement, how could you doubt them? Now, they were themselves for sure, and with Great Risk they passed on the information. If they discussed it openly, they would have been put to Death. In the Gnostics, It states, Jesus was hung on a Tree because he burnt his food." which means he talked to the wrong people about the magic. Yes, Jesus like Osiris was tied to the religious belief system. That is a product of the controlling group to maintain control. Can I say, that Sir Isacc Newton was a myth because he spoke of the secret, the Magic? That Paracelsus spoke of the Magic in a secretive way, and therefor he also was a myth? Plato, and Platonics is about the same magic. It is with all the old philosophers, and so, how do we rate them? I will bring up what they said, and show it is the old Religion, the base of the Myth, what does that make them? if Jesus speaks of it, and he does so in many places in the gnostics, what does that make him? How does a myth speak of a hidden science. Even Osiris does not speak of it, as he was pure myth, tied to the process which as i see it, was made into the religion because of the same magic, the same process. Much of what has been said is wrong. Why is it wrong? Because if the process is what the religion and Jesus are based on, how can it be explained if that is not known? For an example. The three wise men? Why Wise Men? Why is it the Wisdom of Sophia? Why is it the three stars on orions Belt, and are you sure it is because of the earths wobble during december? Why then is there no holiday during June, same thing happens. Why then is the Dog Star tied to sirius? Why not just ask, why a dog is tied to any of it if it is not about rotting matter made Perfect by nature. Note that Osiris was in a Swamp? Note the Eye of Horus or Eye of God, that is actually about Osiris being tied to the sun in Dec. But that is not the end, rather when Osiris goes to heaven to Unite with God to become a God. Now if he does that in Dec., what happened before to get him to that point? Is any of this written in the stars? Yes, or, why the Virgin Birth in September, and note, that is three days (months) before December. So, could it be that the three Wise men have something to do with wisdom, as does Sophia?

There is really one question that has to be answered. What is the Magic, and what is alchemy actually about. I mentioned Platonics. I said all the past philosophers, or at least many, it is everywhere. They all knew it and the past. Why is it that it is still unknown today? It explains everything, and lastly, there is Great Benifit in the explanation. Society could again have the medicne. I don't know what it does, but what if it cures all ills? Jesus had it, Paracelsus had it, the Alchemists had it. Why don't we.

Al



Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:00 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Pop up Book Fanatic


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked: 9 times in 6 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Netherlands (nl)

Post Re: Christ in Egypt: The Virgin Isis-Mery
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
I totally agree. That is exactly how I read CiE. Somehow the religion was trying to consolidate all the religions present at that complicated part of the world, where Egyptian, Roman, Greek and Jewish mythology met.


They wished to harmonize all the data that was incoming. There is no need to consider their efforts as "creating a false story". Instead, they considered each story to be representative of "something" true, even though they may not have any idea what that something is.


I think that is a nice idea, but if one considers how religion places itself in society and in history, it is not just about knowledge but very much about control.
This is where I draw the line between philosophy and religion.
I think this is where Moses crosses that line in Exodus (I know he probably didnt exist either, but again I refer to the STORY and not to history!). I refer to the part of the story where he comes down the mountain for the first time and 'breaks the law': "If you don't believe what I tell you, I kill you". And he did. After that Moses receives the Law for a 2nd time ("thou shalt not kill !!"), which was probably not in the first "issue" :lol:
Islam continues that attitude. :(
Controlling people with religion is actually politics and not philosophy. So there are political reasons to change religious ideas, resulting in the loss of certain philosophical ideas that are behind it.
Perhaps you are right and that there was a philosophical need to bring all these notions together, the need for answering questions about life and our place in the universe, but I sincerely believe that the drive was politics and not knowledge.



Tue Aug 09, 2011 5:46 am
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:


BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books

Poll

Yes  75%  [3]
No  25%  [1]
Total votes: 4

Books by New Authors

Visual Help for Getting Started


Top Posters

Of all time: Chris OConnor (14185), Interbane (5602), DWill (4965), stahrwe (4610), Robert Tulip (4246), Mr. Pessimistic (3542), johnson1010 (3326), geo (3269), ant (3120), Penelope (2969), Saffron (2859), Suzanne (2485), Frank 013 (2021), Dissident Heart (1796), bleachededen (1680), President Camacho (1614), Ophelia (1543), Dexter (1453), tat tvam asi (1298), youkrst (1295)

Of the last 24 hrs: Movie Nerd (20), ant (13), lehelvandor (8), Robert Tulip (6), Flann 5 (6), LanDroid (6), youkrst (5), Interbane (3), TheWizard (3), Cattleman (2), CoolSummer (2), Hal Henry (2), DK Mok (1), R J Chance (1), giselle (1), jjames76 (1), ClosetScribe (1), bionov (1), Vikki (1), Taylor (1)




BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Atheist Mind, Humanist Heart - by Lex Bayer and John FigdorSense and Goodness Without God - by Richard CarrierFrankenstein - by Mary ShelleyThe Big Questions - by Simon BlackburnScience Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2014. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank