Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3215 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 818 Thanked: 813 times in 611 posts
Gender: Country:
Chapter Highlights
The Gene Machine is the vessel used by the gene to secure its replication, ie us. Muscles are the genes' gadgets for moving. The most complex known gene machine is the human brain with ten thousand million neurons. Dawkins says
Quote:
the main way in which brains actually contribute to the success of survival machines is by controlling and coordinating the contraction of muscles.
I'm not sure this wording is quite right, as it reads a bit like asking someone for directions and being told to contract your muscles. In any event, genes are purposive and intentional, causing specific effects.
Dawkins notes that genetic determinism is more complicated for conscious humans. observing that
Quote:
purposiveness has evolved the property we call consciousness.
Comparing decisions to the way a steam regulator modulates the pressure of a boiler, he downplays human freedom, suggesting our genes control our behaviour like a computer programmer setting the parameters for a user.
To illustrate this genetic pre-programming, he mentions an intriguing science fiction book co-written by astronomer Fred Hoyle, who coined the term 'the big bang'. In this story, A for Andromeda, Andromedans send out radio instructions on how to build a computer. The broadcast is read on earth, and
Quote:
“the computer was well on the way to dictatorship over the world before the hero eventually finished it off with an axe.”
The point is that “all its instructions had to be written in advance because of the inviolable 200 year barrier” caused by the distance from Andromeda to Sol, and that genes similarly need to program in advance - set and forget.
Life is a lottery. Gamblers bet based on stake, odds and prize. Dawkins explains here that this mathematical calculation is performed by genes, over thousands of generations, statistically averaged out so the best genetic gamblers win. In humans, simulating the bet of life evolved into imagination.
The most interesting comment in the chapter picks up this theme of human imaginative freedom:
Quote:
Consciousness...can be thought of as the culmination of an evolutionary trend towards the emancipation of survival machines as executive decision-takers from their ultimate masters, the genes. (p63)
This statement is problematic, as it suggests human consciousness and imagination have made evolution obsolete.
Question: Do you think Dawkins should have included a weasel-word here, the “seeming” emancipation from our genetic masters, given that in the long run human life is determined by the natural framework of evolution?
To help explain how bodies are survival machines for genes, Dawkins uses the example of foul brood in bees. Hygienic strains kill infected young, while susceptible strains get foul brood. Experiments found one gene for tossing infected babies on the rubbish heap, and another for uncapping wax cells of diseased grubs. The first gene only works in the presence of the second. For susceptible bees, human intervention to uncap infected baby bees leads to remorseless murder of the defective as the tossing gene moves into action. Without this human intervention these cute babies would infect and kill the hive. Dawkins' point here is that the two genes for tossing and uncapping operate separately but in cooperation, and that separate genes do determine specific behaviours.
Successful behaviour machines exploit their niche to expand their genetic presence. Communication is a principle method, including lies and deception. Dawkins presents “the ruthless judge of the court of survival” as the framework to assess apparent altruism in this moral jungle, where
Quote:
Children will deceive their parents, husbands will cheat on wives, and brother will lie to brother. (p70)
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3718 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 347 Thanked: 747 times in 562 posts
Gender: Country:
I think more of human behavior can be attributed to genes than most people realize. At the same time, there are emergent properties of the human brain that evolution alone can't account for. He touches on this in the chapter about memes. In other words, our genes can give us the power to act on reasons, but there is no control over where those reasons will lead us. Examples are contraceptives and suicide. The question is then how valuable the power to act on reasons actually is. I believe it is our primary evolutionary advantage, but it comes with mixed blessings.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3215 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 818 Thanked: 813 times in 611 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
I think more of human behavior can be attributed to genes than most people realize. At the same time, there are emergent properties of the human brain that evolution alone can't account for. He touches on this in the chapter about memes. In other words, our genes can give us the power to act on reasons, but there is no control over where those reasons will lead us. Examples are contraceptives and suicide. The question is then how valuable the power to act on reasons actually is. I believe it is our primary evolutionary advantage, but it comes with mixed blessings.
When you say that evolution cannot account for the brain, you are obviously not implying that the brain is somehow miraculous, but rather that the rational capacity of thought cuts the moorings from instinct. The ‘mixed blessing’ of this separation of spirit from nature is our capacity for good and evil – good through recognition of universal truths and evil through corrupted alienation from our natural essence.
Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 3 Location: OH
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Re: Chapter Highlights
Robert Tulip wrote:
... Dawkins notes that genetic determinism is more complicated for conscious humans. observing that
Quote:
purposiveness has evolved the property we call consciousness.
Comparing decisions to the way a steam regulator modulates the pressure of a boiler, he downplays human freedom, suggesting our genes control our behaviour like a computer programmer setting the parameters for a user.
The most interesting comment in the chapter picks up this theme of human imaginative freedom:
Quote:
Consciousness...can be thought of as the culmination of an evolutionary trend towards the emancipation of survival machines as executive decision-takers from their ultimate masters, the genes. (p63)
This statement is problematic, as it suggests human consciousness and imagination have made evolution obsolete.
Question: Do you think Dawkins should have included a weasel-word here, the “seeming” emancipation from our genetic masters, given that in the long run human life is determined by the natural framework of evolution?
Perhaps Dawkins did not intend to imply that the "emancipation" is complete, but rather that it is an ongoing struggle, thus not (yet?) rendering evolution obsolete. However his choice of words, "culmination of an evolutionary trend", would seem to imply so, although I find this idea somewhat confusing because I don't think Dawkins would argue that consciousness is somehow attempting to overthrow evolution as executive decision maker of the survival machine.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3718 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 347 Thanked: 747 times in 562 posts
Gender: Country:
RT: "When you say that evolution cannot account for the brain, you are obviously not implying that the brain is somehow miraculous, but rather that the rational capacity of thought cuts the moorings from instinct."
Evolution created the brain. What I said was that there are emergent properties of the brain which evolution can't account for.
RT: "The ‘mixed blessing’ of this separation of spirit from nature is our capacity for good and evil – good through recognition of universal truths and evil through corrupted alienation from our natural essence."
I don't think the capacity for good and evil is relevant. An emergent property of the mind which evolution can't account for is our classification of our actions. The actions themselves are objectively neutral, morality is only a useful notion to us sentient beings. A tree does not see a logger as evil. Such notions are a lens through which we understand our world, and there is nothing universal about them.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3718 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 347 Thanked: 747 times in 562 posts
Gender: Country:
Bry: "I don't think Dawkins would argue that consciousness is somehow attempting to overthrow evolution as executive decision maker of the survival machine."
I don't think consciousness currently can overthrow evolution as you put it, but it can work in tandem to influence selection and level the playing field(helping otherwise useless people to procreate). If we start manipulating genes, then the coup will be for real. However, such an advanced process requires the infrastructure of society, and if that ever failed, evolution would again be the primary directive mechanism.
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 1871 Images: 1 Location: NC
Thanks: 409 Thanked: 466 times in 347 posts
Gender: Country:
Robert Tulip wrote:
The most interesting comment in the chapter picks up this theme of human imaginative freedom:
Quote:
Consciousness...can be thought of as the culmination of an evolutionary trend towards the emancipation of survival machines as executive decision-takers from their ultimate masters, the genes. (p63)
This statement is problematic, as it suggests human consciousness and imagination have made evolution obsolete.
Question: Do you think Dawkins should have included a weasel-word here, the “seeming” emancipation from our genetic masters, given that in the long run human life is determined by the natural framework of evolution?
I'm not so sure that evolution is providing a meaningful framework for human development any more. Consider that we control our environment to a large degree. Our technology in food production and transportation means we can live just about anywhere and make our own food and be comfortable and still have lots of free time on our hands. We're also wildly successful in terms of procreation which, after all, is our genes' prime directive. In a very short time span (at least geologically) we've firmly established ourselves as the dominant species on this planet. If procreation is the goal of evolution, our work is done.
Evolution helps animals to adapt to changing conditions so it's noteworthy that by far most of the change we have to deal with today is largely of our own making; Look at how rapidly things are changing and think about how our ancestors lived just 100 or 200 years ago. Evolution by its nature is ponderously slow, so with such fast change, isn't evolution largely irrelevant?
Here's the crux of it. Though we are technologically advanced, we are still primitive creatures, as Dawkins says, still governed by our genes. (I always like to say we are just monkeys with guns.) Many if not most of our motivations are based on primitive impulses to eat and procreate. This would explain how incredibly selfish we are, why we eat more than we need, why we pollute our planet, why we are insatiable in so many ways.
Dawkins' is trying to build up the idea that: "that animal behavior, altruistic or selfish, is under the control of genes in only an indirect but still very powerful sense. By dictating the way survival machines and their nervous systems are built, genes exert ultimate power over behavior. But the moment-to-moment decisions about what to do next are taken by the nervous system. Genes are the primary policy-makers; brains are the executives." pg. 60
I don't know if the evolutionary trend is towards the emancipation from our genes, but it seems likely that we do need to take charge and rise above our primitive hard-wiring in order to survive. That's why I think understanding evolution is so important and why we need to see ourselves as animals—survival machines—and very much part of the same ecosystem as other creatures. Without that insight, without a very conscious intellectual effort to do more than what our genes tell us—eat and procreate—we are going to destroy our planet. It turns out our genes aren't very good at seeing the big picture.
_________________ -Geo Who Knows Only His Own Generation Remains Always a Child Cicero, Orator 120
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3892 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 561 times in 453 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Evolution created the brain. What I said was that there are emergent properties of the brain which evolution can't account for.
Emergence is a thought that should be held and discussed at greater length. Emergent properties are important also in the sense that natural selection doesn't account for what emerges from the forge of creation. There is a slight mystical quality here for me. Kauffman says that the creativity of life is partly beyond explanation of natural law, though it violates no natural laws.
Quote:
I don't think the capacity for good and evil is relevant. An emergent property of the mind which evolution can't account for is our classification of our actions. The actions themselves are objectively neutral, morality is only a useful notion to us sentient beings. A tree does not see a logger as evil. Such notions are a lens through which we understand our world, and there is nothing universal about them.
I think that's a very good thumbnail of the difference between transcendence-prone thinking and the scientific outlook.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3718 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 347 Thanked: 747 times in 562 posts
Gender: Country:
DWill: "Emergence is a thought that should be held and discussed at greater length."
Absolutely. We might need to disambiguate first however. The emergence I was referring to is how order arises from something so complex or so chaotic that we can't currently understand it. For example, we have evolved an imaginative complex in our brain(whatever the proper name may be), so we can say evolution is responsible for that region of the brain. However, there are some things we can imagine which are independant of evolutionary influence.
You mention emergence as it applies to the direction positive mutations take. I don't think it is beyond the explanation of natural law. The math required, however, is currently and possibly forever beyond us. To factor the creative force of evolution, you'd have to take into account every possible genetic combination. In other word, every possible mutation that could arise from DNA based life. Factor in selection pressures(if that's even possible) of the environment, and you're left with all possible and probable mutations. No doubt life on Earth only represents the smallest fraction of what could have evolved.
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 3892 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 689 Thanked: 561 times in 453 posts
Gender: Country:
Robert Tulip wrote:
The most interesting comment in the chapter picks up this theme of human imaginative freedom:
Quote:
Consciousness...can be thought of as the culmination of an evolutionary trend towards the emancipation of survival machines as executive decision-takers from their ultimate masters, the genes. (p63)
This statement is problematic, as it suggests human consciousness and imagination have made evolution obsolete.
Evolution by natural selection is a fascinating topic, but I've wondered whether people sometimes invest it with semi-religious qualities, holding onto it as some means of hope for our future. Like Geo, I've assumed that at this point, evolution--if we mean evolution by natural selection--is pretty much out of the picture for our species. What we will have, I guess, is populations changing in undefiined ways and plain old history instead of evolution. Concsiousness has allowed us to take over where evolution ended. Dawkins doesn't seem to be saying, though, that consciousness will emancipate us from our genes, only that it takes us in that direction.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3718 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 347 Thanked: 747 times in 562 posts
Gender: Country:
Dwill: "Concsiousness has allowed us to take over where evolution ended."
It's interesting that the critical thinking book we're currently discussing is all about the shortcomings of our consciousness, the biases that we've evolved.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.
Support BookTalk.org
BookTalk.org is being upgraded to a totally new design. This upgrade is expensive. Any support would be VERY helpful! See who supports us.
Make a donation
PEOPLE PAYING FOR OUR UPGRADE:
• afv - $10 May
• LevV - $50 March
• Dexter - $10 March
• supernova38 - $25 March
• Oblivion - $20 March
• jheimlich - $20 February
• Robert Tulip - $50 February
• giselle - $50 January
Children here need worming
regularly, and I think I
need to buy more worming
tablets, so while my friends
sit on the beach, I have to
catch bush taxis up to the… more
The children have a long way
to walk to the nearest primary
school. At the moment they are
in temporary accommodation,
with volunteer teachers. There
is community land available,
a… more
The price of The 12th Disciple
has been updated to $3.99 for
Kindle readers. The book is
still available for free to
borrow for Amazon Prime
members. To be
competitive, and s… more
The 12th Disciple has been
reviewed by two different
people on Amazon. They
purchased the Kindle edition;
one in the US, one in the
UK. One review was
5-stars (US) and the oth… more
I'd like to say I've
been reading Harry Potter
since the day the world renown
series appeared on the
scene. Unfortunately,
the truth is I began reading
Harry Potter… more
Easter teaches many of us the
importance of redemption and
resurrection. Regardless of
what faith people follow, the
story of Jesus Christ has been
told in many languages in many
c… more
Our Book Talk will begin on
Wednesday, May 2nd. I look
forward to hearing about your
learning and classroom
experiences with Number Talks
as it all unfolds...
NONOPPOSITIONAL NONVIOLENCE
The minute you conquer the
fear of death, at that moment
you are free. I submit to you
that if a man hasnt
discovered something that he
will die f… more
Yesterday, when I went to feed
Jeni the donkey, I noticed
swarms of bees entering
Ebrimas house through the
cracks in the door. We both
had a look, but he didnt
open his door… more
Whether you want to implement
number talks but are unsure of
how to begin or have
experience but want more
guidance in crafting
purposeful problems, this
dynamic multimedia resourc… more
Do you feel entitled? For
years I have listened to and,
in some instances, complained
that some people in America
feel entitled. For years I
have watched as these people
are portra… more
On Fat Tuesday and Ash
Wednesday of 2012, The 12th
Disciple was free to Kindle
users on both days. In all,
about 550 worldwide Kindle
users downloaded a copy of the
book.
Sacred Are the Brave a
collection of short stories
about the nonviolent
revolutions 1986-1989 is now
available in Kindle. Each of
the nine stories has
characters who are just
… more
The Weekend Trippers is the
true story of Rfn Ted Taylor
and his part in the heroic
last stand in Calais May 1940.
The Weekend Trippers is based
on Teds diaries written at
the… more
Tell your friends when to meet you in the BookTalk.org Chat Room.
If you enjoy business bestsellers and would like to expand your business knowledge check out the quality book summaries offered by the world's leading book summary company.
BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.