Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:35 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Devourer of Words

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2918
Location: NC
Thanks: 943
Thanked: 1007 times in 751 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
stahrwe wrote:
geo wrote:
stahrwe wrote:

The Abrahamic monotheistic religions did indeed emerged from polytheism but it was a separation not an evolution and the story is recounted in Genesis. Of course that doesn't fill or sell a book.


If it was a separation, where did polytheism go? And aren't there vestiges of polytheism in Christianity? Angels, Satan, Jesus, etc.


No.
Jesus is part of the Trinity
Satan was an arch angel. He and the other angels were created by God. They are not gods, and are NOT to be worshipped in any way shape or form.


By the way, that's not any kind of argument. Just saying something doesn't make it true.

If you're going to say Wright is wrong, you need to make an argument yourself and back it up with evidence. Saying Wright got such and such wrong in the Bible is not very conducive to rational discourse. You dismiss Wright's larger theories based on little details that depend largely on your own interpretation. And we all know the Bible can be interpreted any number of ways. I previously cited the Malleus Maleficarum which shows how scripture was twisted to justify the persecution of witches.

I would argue that demons, Satan, angels, etc. are minor gods. You say they are not to be worshipped, but they are supernatural beings nonetheless, much like the minor gods of the Greek pantheon. As for saying Jesus being part of the Trinity, that's just semantic trickery. The Trinity consists of three beings, all gods. Saying they are part of a trinity doesn't change that basic fact.


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:06 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
geo wrote:
stahrwe wrote:

The Abrahamic monotheistic religions did indeed emerged from polytheism but it was a separation not an evolution and the story is recounted in Genesis. Of course that doesn't fill or sell a book.


If it was a separation, where did polytheism go? And aren't there vestiges of polytheism in Christianity? Angels, Satan, Jesus, etc.


No.
Jesus is part of the Trinity
Satan was an arch angel. He and the other angels were created by God. They are not gods, and are NOT to be worshipped in any way shape or form.[/quote]

Geo wrote:
By the way, that's not any kind of argument. Just saying something doesn't make it true.


If you would like to go through the nuts and bolts of it I would be more than happy to demonstrate the correctness of what I said.

Geo wrote:
If you're going to say Wright is wrong, you need to make an argument yourself and back it up with evidence. Saying Wright got such and such wrong in the Bible is not very conducive to rational discourse. You dismiss Wright's larger theories based on little details that depend largely on your own interpretation. And we all know the Bible can be interpreted any number of ways. I previously cited the Malleus Maleficarum which shows how scripture was twisted to justify the persecution of witches.


This is absolutely ridiculous. In discussing Wright's book, I do not have to provide an alternative although I have done so. Your recourse to the Malleus Maleficarum is a typical attempt to introduce a rabbit. If you wish to chase that one, start a new thread.

Geo wrote:
I would argue that demons, Satan, angels, etc. are minor gods. You say they are not to be worshipped, but they are supernatural beings nonetheless, much like the minor gods of the Greek pantheon. As for saying Jesus being part of the Trinity, that's just semantic trickery. The Trinity consists of three beings, all gods. Saying they are part of a trinity doesn't change that basic fact.


Quote:
who and what angels are: God's angels are described as:
Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation? (Heb 1:14)

All of the angels were created by Jesus:
For by him [Jesus] all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. (Col 1:16 )

The Lord Jesus created all of the angels. This even includes Michael the archangel, which some cults wrongly think is Jesus!
.
God's angels worship Jesus:
And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, "Let all God's angels worship him [Jesus]." (Heb 1:6)

God's angels obey Him:
Praise the LORD, you his angels, you mighty ones who do his bidding, who obey his word. (Psa. 103:20)

God's angels praise Him:
Praise him, all his angels, praise him, all his heavenly hosts. (Psa. 148:2)

God's angels refuse to receive worship:
Then the angel said to me, "Write: 'Blessed are those who are invited to the wedding supper of the Lamb!' " And he added, "These are the true words of God." At this I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, "Do not do it! I am a fellow servant with you and with your brothers who hold to the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." (Rev 19:9,10)

And when I had heard and seen them, I fell down to worship at the feet of the angel who had been showing them to me. But he said to me, "Do not do it! I am a fellow servant with you and with your brothers the prophets and of all who keep the words of this book. Worship God!" (Rev. 22:8,9).


Angels will be judged by Christians:
Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! (1 Cor 6:3)

http://www.evangelicaloutreach.org/angels.htm


I also suggest that we start a discussion of the Trinity. It doesn't belong here.
There are no such things as minor gods.


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:23 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4834
Location: California
Thanks: 545
Thanked: 1205 times in 927 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Quote:
No.
Jesus is part of the Trinity
Satan was an arch angel. He and the other angels were created by God. They are not gods, and are NOT to be worshipped in any way shape or form.


Ahahah! Argumentum Dogmaticus!

There is nothing logical or rational here, just words repeated from text. Use your own thoughts Starhwe.

Quote:
There are no such things as minor gods.


Nice claim, prove it.



The following user would like to thank Interbane for this post:
geo
Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:29 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Devourer of Words

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2918
Location: NC
Thanks: 943
Thanked: 1007 times in 751 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
geo wrote:

Wright argues that we tend to find a scriptural basis for intolerance or belligerence when we are in zero-sum relationships with other people, but when they see the relationship as non-zero-sum we are more likely to find the tolerant and understanding side of their scriptures. Is that where Wright is wrong? Or do you disagree with Wright's argument that our concept of God has changed over time? That religion has evolved from polytheism to monotheism?


Stahrwe, you still haven't responded to this. I have summarized some of Wright's major ideas. Are any of them wrong? All of them? Why?


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:52 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Interbane wrote:
stahrwe wrote:
]No.
Jesus is part of the Trinity
Satan was an arch angel. He and the other angels were created by God. They are not gods, and are NOT to be worshipped in any way shape or form.


interbane wrote:
Ahahah! Argumentum Dogmaticus!

There is nothing logical or rational here, just words repeated from text. Use your own thoughts Starhwe.


I don't know a starhwe.
I have sufficiently addressed this issue for the scope of this thread. We are intruding on DWill's Chapter 13. If you want to discuss this further, start a new thread.

Quote:
There are no such things as minor gods.


interbane wrote:
Nice claim, prove it.
[/quote]


You can't prove something does not exist. A logic giant such are yourself should know that.


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:38 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4834
Location: California
Thanks: 545
Thanked: 1205 times in 927 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Quote:
You can't prove something does not exist. A logic giant such are yourself should know that.


Then why are you so certain? If you know this to be true, the most honest claim would be to say that you doubt there are such things as minor gods.

Quote:
I have sufficiently addressed this issue for the scope of this thread. We are intruding on DWill's Chapter 13. If you want to discuss this further, start a new thread.


You are making claims based on dogma which in no way addresses geo's problems with the transition of polytheism to monotheism, which is a part of this thread. Don't blame me for calling shenanigans when I see it.



Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:04 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
geo wrote:
geo wrote:

Wright argues that we tend to find a scriptural basis for intolerance or belligerence when we are in zero-sum relationships with other people, but when they see the relationship as non-zero-sum we are more likely to find the tolerant and understanding side of their scriptures. Is that where Wright is wrong? Or do you disagree with Wright's argument that our concept of God has changed over time? That religion has evolved from polytheism to monotheism?


Stahrwe, you still haven't responded to this. I have summarized some of Wright's major ideas. Are any of them wrong? All of them? Why?


Wright appears to be incapable of reading scripture. With respect to zero sum games he is a one trick pony. That seems to be his comfort zone. The question of our concept of God changing over time seeks a defintion. My concept of God has certainly changed over time as I went from ignorance of Him to salvation, to back slidden to returned to the fold. All the while I was changing He was constant. The same is true for each individual and society at large. Polytheism is an aberration of the true relationship of humanity to God. It tries to distract from that relationship by providing a replacement. That Wright is incapable of understanding that is not unexpected. His idea that conflict is brought about when members of society disagree is tautological. That is the basis of conflict and his assertion that monotheism abhorred synchretism, in my opion is a major reason to reject his (Wright's) theory that monotheism evolved from polytheism. Generally polytheism has room for one more god. In fact, in the Book of Acts we find a prime example:

Acts 17 wrote:

16 While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols.
17 So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Greeks, as well as in the marketplace day by day with those who happened to be there.
18 A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to dispute with him. Some of them asked, "What is this babbler trying to say?" Others remarked, "He seems to be advocating foreign gods." They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.
19 Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, "May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting?
20 You are bringing some strange ideas to our ears, and we want to know what they mean." 21 (All the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there spent their time doing nothing but talking about and listening to the latest ideas.)
22 Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: "Men of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious.
23 For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you.


The Greeks were so ready to accept new gods they did so in advance before it was known.

Wright argues that it is monotheism's flaws which lead to conflict and perhaps that is the case. But I point out, that it was not the Christians who started the persecutions. In fact they were the victims of polytheism and it wasn't religious intolerence which was necessarily the driving force.
So, Geo, since this is pop quiz day, what was the source of the conflict I refer to above?

I don't see any point in continuing from here. There are plenty of books on the history of Christianity by people who know what they are talking about that we could read and discuss and pick apart.


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:02 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
You can't prove something does not exist. A logic giant such are yourself should know that.


Then why are you so certain? If you know this to be true, the most honest claim would be to say that you doubt there are such things as minor gods.


I stand by my original statement without the word doubt.

Quote:
I have sufficiently addressed this issue for the scope of this thread. We are intruding on DWill's Chapter 13. If you want to discuss this further, start a new thread.


interbane wrote:
You are making claims based on dogma which in no way addresses geo's problems with the transition of polytheism to monotheism, which is a part of this thread. Don't blame me for calling shenanigans when I see it.


It is not shenanigans to discredit portions of a book which are obviously wrong. In fact it is empiricism to do so and if your 'belief' system wasn't so closely linked to that of Wright you should be supporting my efforts. When I read a book by Christian authors I am very intolerant of mistakes, even minor ones as it calls into question to correctness of the large issues, but perhaps you don't care.


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:16 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4834
Location: California
Thanks: 545
Thanked: 1205 times in 927 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Quote:
I stand by my original statement without the word doubt.


You are absolutely certain they don't exist. But you cannot prove it. That is an excellent example of faith. When will you ever admit that faith is far more a part of your life than logic and reasoning? Each and every one of your belief system axioms depends primarily on faith.

Even the most sound argument on Earth has room for doubt. But you do not doubt your own conviction.

"Inquiry is fatal to certainty." ~ William J. Durant

"Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof." ~ Charles Edward Montague

"To be uncertain is to be uncomfortable, but to be certain is to be ridiculous." ~ Chinese Proverb

“Doubt is uncomfortable, certainty is ridiculous.” ~ Voltaire

Quote:
It is not shenanigans to discredit portions of a book which are obviously wrong. In fact it is empiricism to do so and if your 'belief' system wasn't so closely linked to that of Wright you should be supporting my efforts.


Nearly every item you have an issue with is nothing more than a difference of opinion. It's a matter of interpretation. I agree with you that if you read between the lines regarding Jesus explicitly saying he was the "Son of Man", the thread is tenuous. But how does this relate to the overall book?

You cannot criticize his overall thesis, so you claim that by nitpicking the molehills and proclaiming them to be mountains that the entire book is false. Your attempts are severely biased, and everyone in this discussion but yourself finds it absurd. At least be objective.



Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:48 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
I stand by my original statement without the word doubt.


You are absolutely certain they don't exist. But you cannot prove it. That is an excellent example of faith. When will you ever admit that faith is far more a part of your life than logic and reasoning? Each and every one of your belief system axioms depends primarily on faith.

Even the most sound argument on Earth has room for doubt. But you do not doubt your own conviction.

"Inquiry is fatal to certainty." ~ William J. Durant

"Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof." ~ Charles Edward Montague

"To be uncertain is to be uncomfortable, but to be certain is to be ridiculous." ~ Chinese Proverb

“Doubt is uncomfortable, certainty is ridiculous.” ~ Voltaire

Quote:
It is not shenanigans to discredit portions of a book which are obviously wrong. In fact it is empiricism to do so and if your 'belief' system wasn't so closely linked to that of Wright you should be supporting my efforts.


Nearly every item you have an issue with is nothing more than a difference of opinion. It's a matter of interpretation. I agree with you that if you read between the lines regarding Jesus explicitly saying he was the "Son of Man", the thread is tenuous. But how does this relate to the overall book?

You cannot criticize his overall thesis, so you claim that by nitpicking the molehills and proclaiming them to be mountains that the entire book is false. Your attempts are severely biased, and everyone in this discussion but yourself finds it absurd. At least be objective.


You have not been paying attention and since you insist, I will continue.
I am not nitpicking Wright. If Wright makes a statement based on Biblical reference he has an obligation to be correct. The items I have cited are not matters of interpretation, or if they are the people who should know the correct interpretation were ready to stone Jesus because they interpreted His statments to mean that He was claiming to be the Son of Man.

If you want me to nit pick I will be happy to do so because write leave a nit on nearly every page. I have only mentioned the big ones. As for criticizing Wright's premise, I did that in one of my earliest posts where I pointed out that he missed the easiest explanation for the transition from polytheism to monotheism. I cited the error Wright made and the correct version of the story, a version which, if you were being honest would be preferred as it is consistent with Occam's razor.

Here is what I would do with TEoG
Ditch Section 1 completely

Excise any mention of Jesus or the Bible from the rest of the book because Wright invariably gets it wrong and it just confuses the issue.

Stay away from any mention of the Koran or Islam to avoid any possibility of jihad.

If he does this he should have a reasonable story to tell.

ps, do you really like your collection of pithy quotes?


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Last edited by stahrwe on Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:59 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Devourer of Words

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2918
Location: NC
Thanks: 943
Thanked: 1007 times in 751 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
stahrwe wrote:
As for criticizing Wright's premise, I did that in one of my earliest posts where I pointed out that he missed the easiest explanation for the transition from polytheism to monotheism. I cited the error Wright made and the correct version of the story, a version which, if you were being honest would be preferred as it is consistent with Occam's razor.


I missed this explanation of the transition from polytheism to monotheism. Can you point me to it.


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:24 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4834
Location: California
Thanks: 545
Thanked: 1205 times in 927 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Quote:
ps, do you really like your collection of pithy quotes?


I do. Do you enjoy the feeling of certainty?

Quote:
The items I have cited are not matters of interpretation, or if they are...


They most certainly are matters of interpretation. Into this grouping I classify a literalist interpretation of the bible. You may be using the words exactly as they are written, but that is precisely the problem. You are approaching this conversation as if the words are true, yet everyone else here approaches it as if much was fabricated. Interpretations include not only the biblical hermeneutics you're used to, but also the lens of literary scholarship, that bits and pieces are true while others are false. To treat a work of fiction as if it contained half truths is most certainly a valid method of interpretation.

I'm not saying it's appropriate to cherry pick the parts you want to be true, but it is also not appropriate to say that all parts are true. Such an approach leads to absurd conclusions.



Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:07 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Devourer of Words

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2918
Location: NC
Thanks: 943
Thanked: 1007 times in 751 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Interbane wrote:
I'm not saying it's appropriate to cherry pick the parts you want to be true, but it is also not appropriate to say that all parts are true. Such an approach leads to absurd conclusions.


You mean, like a flat earth or a 6,000-year-old earth?


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


The following user would like to thank geo for this post:
Interbane
Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:21 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
geo wrote:
stahrwe wrote:
As for criticizing Wright's premise, I did that in one of my earliest posts where I pointed out that he missed the easiest explanation for the transition from polytheism to monotheism. I cited the error Wright made and the correct version of the story, a version which, if you were being honest would be preferred as it is consistent with Occam's razor.


I missed this explanation of the transition from polytheism to monotheism. Can you point me to it.


It's in one of the other chapter discussions. Perhaps in My Thoughts. It relates to Genesis and Abraham. You can use the search feature of BT.


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:48 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4584
Location: Florida
Thanks: 146
Thanked: 247 times in 215 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 13 - How Jesus Became Savior
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
ps, do you really like your collection of pithy quotes?


I do. Do you enjoy the feeling of certainty?


I do. But I have always thought that pithy quotes should be used sparingly. Usually one can find a counter quote and most of the time the person quoted is of marginal interest.

Quote:
The items I have cited are not matters of interpretation, or if they are...


Interbane wrote:
They most certainly are matters of interpretation. Into this grouping I classify a literalist interpretation of the bible. You may be using the words exactly as they are written, but that is precisely the problem. You are approaching this conversation as if the words are true, yet everyone else here approaches it as if much was fabricated. Interpretations include not only the biblical hermeneutics you're used to, but also the lens of literary scholarship, that bits and pieces are true while others are false. To treat a work of fiction as if it contained half truths is most certainly a valid method of interpretation.


I have never appreciated your method of posting quotes. There is no interpretation necessary when Jesus references the Son of Man and the Pharisees prepare to stone Him. Wright claims that Jesus was not explicitly referring to Himself. Perhaps, but that is a distinction without a difference, or, for the nose bleed crowd, a parsing akin to 'it depends on what the definitiono of the word is - is.'

Interbane wrote:
I'm not saying it's appropriate to cherry pick the parts you want to be true, but it is also not appropriate to say that all parts are true. Such an approach leads to absurd conclusions.


If Jesus was not claiming to be the Son of Man, please explain what other interpretation of what Jesus was saying caused the urge to stone Him.

thanks.


_________________
“You cannot evade the issue of God, whether you talk about pigs or the binomial theory, you are still talking about Him. Now if Christianity be. . . a fragment of metaphysical nonsense invented by a few people, then, of course, defending it will simply mean talking that metaphysical nonsense over and over. But if Christianity should happen to be true – then defending it may mean talking about anything or everything. Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true.”
- G.K. Chesterton


Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:55 pm
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books






BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Science Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

cron
Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2011. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank