Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:13 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Owner
Diamond Contributor 3

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13725
Location: Florida
Thanks: 1810
Thanked: 704 times in 558 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)
Highscores: 8

Post Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
This thread is for discussing Chapter 12 -Conclusion: The Next Stage of History. You can post within this framework or create your own threads.

Chris O'Connor

"For Every Winner, There Are Dozens Of Losers. Odds Are You're One Of Them"




Sat Jul 03, 2004 9:37 am
Profile Email YIM WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
I was actually willing to accept this book as a decent work because, although there were obvious slights against the left throughout, it was not an all out or direct attack on the left. Until chapter 12 that is.

Any credibility I gave Harris as an honest thinker is gone with this chapter. He is just as partisan as Moore or any other. I expect more from those I offer any respect to. One thing Harris has on Moore, from me that is, is that I have read Harris and not Moore. I usually refuse partisan crapola, but since this was our book of choice, I read this.

I must say that I will not be sad to close the book on this, well...book. It was good in places, mostly the historical analysis, but I just do not agree with the conclusions.

Mr. P.

The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.

I came to get down, I came to get down. So get out ya seat and jump around - House of Pain

HEY! Is that a ball in your court? - Mr. P

Edited by: misterpessimistic  at: 9/5/04 3:23 pm



Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:46 am
Profile YIM WWW
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Sophomore

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 259
Location: San Francisco, CA
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 15 times in 13 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
Well, we have FINALLY come to the end of this book. For those of you that have been reading my comments on the other chapters, you can guess what my opinion of the conclusion will be! :-)

First, some comments on the neo-sovereignty discussion at the top of p202. Harris claims that American has found some unique ways of solving the deep-seated conflicts that haunt and divide the rest of mankind--conflicts of race and religion. I find this claim remarkable on two fronts. First, a cursory look at US history will show that we have a tradition of racial strife, along with being the last civilized country to outlaw slavery. Second, we find ourselves in a time when many people are looking to revise our political covenant with religion and join the two more firmly.

Harris asks if this claim is arrogant. But then gives meaningless examples. He asks if we can travel faster by airplane or by camel. What kind of comparison is that? No one would claim that camels are faster than airplanes! But the issue of US arrogance is not as factual and therefore needs more scrutiny. He does the same thing on p214 with the hysterical example of your wife introducing you to her new boyfriend. Would it matter if it was Bush or Clinton?! His point is that the President of the US will have to shoulder a burden of being disliked because of what we are. Unfortunately, the facts don't bear this out. Clinton was and remains well liked internationally, and Bush does not. Why is this? Even if he was the 'almighty leader' he acted in a reasonable way. Underlings do not react well to an overbearing leader who tells them they are irrelevant. I am really surprised Harris does not pick up on this, because he calls it out on p 217
Quote:
the United States cannot permit itself to become the arrogant empire that its critics fear, or, indeed, an empire of whatever kind. It must be first, but first among equals.
Does calling the to the world that 'you are with us or against us' not sound arrogant? Clinton did not act this way and made sure that the international community felt one with the decision making process.




Fri Sep 03, 2004 1:00 am
Profile YIM
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Sophomore

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 259
Location: San Francisco, CA
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 15 times in 13 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
p203 Harris suggests that the US is uniquely positioned to act as the new sovereign because it is powerful and TOLERANT. Again, I find it amazing that the part he finds our strength is what those on the right want to dismiss: our tolerance.

Quote:
By failing to support the US in its effort to offer liberal values to the rest of the world
But this is not what we are doing instead we are IMPOSING. And we have a long history of doing this poorly. First example: Haiti.

p208. Who is Harris talking about with his fad jumpers? Quite honestly, they sound like people with personality disorders, not those in the mainstream.

Quote:
If all that matters is what you believe and now whether what you believe is true, then why shouldn't you believe whatever you like to believe
p209. Here Harris has a fantasy ideology about what the Left is about. Relativism has bounds. What Harris is denying is those boundaries. It is the 'what' that is being discussed that determines how much freedom there is in the relativism. For example, if you want to wear tribal dress and headgear to a board of directors meeting, I don't think most persons would stop you. They might not invite you back, but that is a different issue. However, a relativist would not say killing another is a good way to handle disputes, although it is perfectly acceptable in Haiti or parts of Pakistan. On p211, Harris does get into a good discussion about values and how they relate to relativism. Unfortunately, he misses the answer, which is what the international community decides. For example, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives us a framework for deciding what can be acceptable and what can not.

Harris also discusses why others should adopt our values, and why they have not. He says that others are capable of the same processes as we, and if we expose them to our ideas they can be freely adopted. Of course, this is true, and we see this in many places in the world. But what Harris can't even consider is that some cultures see our values and then decide NOT to adopt them, which certainly does happen.




Fri Sep 03, 2004 1:02 am
Profile YIM
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Sophomore

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 259
Location: San Francisco, CA
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 15 times in 13 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
OK, along with Mr. P, I've had it with the intellectual bashing. I'm going to put my responses all in one place. First of all, what is an intellectual? According to Webster: of or relating to the intellect or its use b : developed or chiefly guided by the intellect rather than by emotion or experience : RATIONAL c : requiring use of the intellect
2 a : given to study, reflection, and speculation b : engaged in activity requiring the creative use of the intellect
Sooooooo, instead of people who use their brain and think about things, we should pay attention to those who don't???? It seems to me that Harris is an intellectual. Should we not pay attention to him?????
Quote:
When the Left-wing intellectual seems to have contempt for everything that the average American holds dear p204
Oh, really??? What is it that the average American holds dear that the 'Left-wing' intellectual holds in contempt???? Tolerance? Diversity? Privacy?
Quote:
Will the intellectual not instinctively prefer any intellectual system that claims to give certainty about everything...
Well, there are two ways to answer this question 1) Wouldn't EVERYONE prefer certainty? Risk aversion is one of the core principals of corporate finance, but 2) No, I don't thing the intellectual would always prefer such a system, because the claims of certainty may be false. And one would have to intellectualize about it to determine if this was so.
Quote:
Much of Left-wing ideology is transparently self-serving of the intellectual class .... it is part of one's own way of imaging the world.
The same could be said for any ideology, from the right or left. Ideologies are a way of imagining the world, that is what makes them useful, to the extent that they are a model that accurately reflects the world. Harris then goes on to say that we have to step out of the ideological box in order to reflect reality. I think he has it backwards. Rational persons only get into such a box once they have decided that it accurately reflects the real world. At some point we can have a hight degree of confidence in an ideology and start to use it regularly. This is called the scientific process. When the facts fit the theory, the theory is accepted until it no longer explains the facts. But if all the know facts are explained (evolution), then the theory is accepted. What Harris is doing is confusing the explanatory and predictive benefits of a world view. If a theory works because it explains so much, it can be used as a world view and predict useful things. This is true until it no longer explains facts. Then it must be revised. This is the scientific method. It is NOT fitting the facts to the world view. Harris give an excellent analogy of this with his exploded boxes. The one thing the analogy does not explain well is that sometimes the box can merely be modified, not exploded.




Fri Sep 03, 2004 1:04 am
Profile YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Owner
Diamond Contributor 3

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13725
Location: Florida
Thanks: 1810
Thanked: 704 times in 558 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)
Highscores: 8

Post Re: Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
I thought the conclusion kicked ass actually. I've got about 10 pages left and then I'll start jumping into these chapter discussions.

Chris

"For Every Winner, There Are Dozens Of Losers. Odds Are You're One Of Them"




Sat Sep 04, 2004 12:54 am
Profile Email YIM WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 12 - Conclusion: The Next Stage of History
Quote:
I thought the conclusion kicked ass actually.


If he did'nt specifically bash the left, I may have been ok with it. He is partisan, and thus I cannot give him any props. I do not listen to partisans, not Moore, not Franken, not Hannity, not Harris.

Mr. P.

The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.

I came to get down, I came to get down. So get out ya seat and jump around - House of Pain

HEY! Is that a ball in your court? - Mr. P




Sat Sep 04, 2004 7:13 am
Profile YIM WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books






BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Science Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

cron
Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2011. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank