Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
We observe that the solar system is stable, that planetary orbits have very slow and predictable rates of change. Our assumptions about the stability of the earth are predicated upon the stability of the cosmos.
There is nothing that says the laws of nature will necessarily remain the same for the rest of eternity. I of course assume they will, and for all practical purposes it is axiomatic. However, our view upstream of the river of time is limited by the fact that we have not been there. I would say that mathematics is likely eternal, but this is a presumption of mine rooted in pantheistic wonder of the nature of mathematics. Eternity is a long time, not even the universe is purported to be eternal. I'm amazed that you think it's dumb to argue against something being eternal.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
Nietzsche was wrong. As I just noted in the memes thread, logic came into man’s head from Animal Foraging and the Evolution of Goal-Directed Cognition.
I think he was wrong as well, but it's still interesting. The parallel he drew to nature selecting logical people over illogical people was fitting for this thread, that's why I posted it.
Nietszsche's image that "logic [came] into existence in man's head [out] of illogic, whose realm originally must have been immense" has a fitting sarcasm regarding the stupidity of popular culture and traditional mythological error. However, it does get the causal origin of logic completely wrong. A redeeming evolutionary insight found in Dawkins and the rest of biology is that humanity is a highly evolved organism, and that features such as logical reasoning are deeply embedded in our DNA as adaptive traits. So the pessimism of Schopenhauer is unwarranted. The deep rationality of human life, with goal setting a key adaptation where gene enters meme, means the illogic of modern life can be replaced by an older logic.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
The deep rationality of human life, with goal setting a key adaptation where gene enters meme, means the illogic of modern life can be replaced by an older logic.
I had assumed you meant that we have evolved the capacity for logic, rather than logic itself. The capacity for logic says nothing about the environment to which we apply it. Today's world is different than the world of ages past, so a more complicated application of logic is required.
What book did you read about dopamine in? I just started the Extended Phenotype last night.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
The deep rationality of human life, with goal setting a key adaptation where gene enters meme, means the illogic of modern life can be replaced by an older logic.
I had assumed you meant that we have evolved the capacity for logic, rather than logic itself. The capacity for logic says nothing about the environment to which we apply it. Today's world is different than the world of ages past, so a more complicated application of logic is required.
What book did you read about dopamine in? I just started the Extended Phenotype last night.
As per earlier discussion, logic itself is eternal, outside time, so yes, we have evolved capacity rather than logic itself. Temporal capacity for logic is only useful to the extent it makes contact with the eternal realities of logic. I think I stumbled upon that article on how dopamine has evolved from reading Bart's thread on hyper-religiosity. In any case, I'm mainly mentioning dopamine and its influence on goal-setting to illustrate how we can in principle find a clear evolutionary path for neural development, with the evolution of logical capacity a clear adaptive advantage for humanity.
Looking at the timeline for human evolution homo erectus was around from 1.8 million years ago, but had brains 75% modern size. I suspect the expansion of the logical goal seeking capacity of the brain was the main step in the evolution of homo sapien from homo erectus.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
As per earlier discussion, logic itself is eternal, outside time
You repeat this without support. This is desperately begging for an examination of what exactly logic is, with references to modern philosophy. Is it based on mathematics, in that it is a descriptive language of the universe itself? If so, give me your reasoning that these things will be applicable for all eternity.
If you say they are outside time, what do you mean? If you remove the component of time from spacetime, you do not have eternity, you have a "moment". In this moment, mathematics may apply to space and may have infinite applicability as long as we consider the spacial dimension of the universe infinite. This isn't eternity, however. Eternity necessarily requires the dimension of time as a component of it's infinite definition.
It seems to me that by saying something is "outside time", it's merely clever phrasing by which to then claim that it is eternal. I did a fast search of the phrase "eternal logic" on google, and the first 5 pages were all religious documents and blogs. Any philosophical overlap was of theological nature. It seems that my intuition was correct in disliking the term eternal. The concept is unnecessary and useless except in the case that you're trying to find a place for a god. It is another case of superfluous wishful thinking.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
As per earlier discussion, logic itself is eternal, outside time
You repeat this without support. This is desperately begging for an examination of what exactly logic is, with references to modern philosophy. Is it based on mathematics, in that it is a descriptive language of the universe itself? If so, give me your reasoning that these things will be applicable for all eternity.
If you say they are outside time, what do you mean? If you remove the component of time from spacetime, you do not have eternity, you have a "moment". In this moment, mathematics may apply to space and may have infinite applicability as long as we consider the spacial dimension of the universe infinite. This isn't eternity, however. Eternity necessarily requires the dimension of time as a component of it's infinite definition.
It seems to me that by saying something is "outside time", it's merely clever phrasing by which to then claim that it is eternal. I did a fast search of the phrase "eternal logic" on google, and the first 5 pages were all religious documents and blogs. Any philosophical overlap was of theological nature. It seems that my intuition was correct in disliking the term eternal. The concept is unnecessary and useless except in the case that you're trying to find a place for a god. It is another case of superfluous wishful thinking.
You do like hard questions Interbane! The etymology of eternal - e-ternal - means outside time. A number such as pi, derived from the ratio between diameter and circumference of a set of planar points equidistant from one point, is indeed the same for all eternity, because it does not depend on anything temporal for its existence. Logical relations are analytic - true by definition, and so are independent of time, eg 2+2=4. Physical relations are synthetic - true by observation, so physical laws such as the law of gravity are not 'outside time' in the same way as logical relations, but do persist throughout time. Hence the difference between the logical and physical meanings of eternity. Eternal values are a whole nother kettle of fish (that is why Plato's Academy had only the three subjects of logic, physics and ethics).
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
We observe that the solar system is stable, that planetary orbits have very slow and predictable rates of change. Our assumptions about the stability of the earth are predicated upon the stability of the cosmos.
There is nothing that says the laws of nature will necessarily remain the same for the rest of eternity. I of course assume they will, and for all practical purposes it is axiomatic. However, our view upstream of the river of time is limited by the fact that we have not been there. I would say that mathematics is likely eternal, but this is a presumption of mine rooted in pantheistic wonder of the nature of mathematics. Eternity is a long time, not even the universe is purported to be eternal. I'm amazed that you think it's dumb to argue against something being eternal.
Science can assess the rate of change of laws of nature. Where these laws are extremely stable in the record of the universe to date they can be expected to maintain this stability. But nothing is forever - the universe will eventually drift out to a series of permanently further away black holes and debris, or it will turn around to another singularity. Maybe the law of gravity will be different in the next universe. However, I find it hard to imagine that the concept of number, natural, integer, fraction, logarithmic, real, irrational, imaginary, fractal, would be essentially different in a successor universe, as numbers express spatial relations, and a succeeding universe would be constituted in space and time. Maybe the quantum forces would be different and life would not evolve? The fact is the quantum forces of our universe are immensely stable and omnipresent, so questioning their eternity goes well beyond short human time spans, within which numbers such as Planck's Constantare eternally true.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
A number such as pi, derived from the ratio between diameter and circumference of a set of planar points equidistant from one point, is indeed the same for all eternity, because it does not depend on anything temporal for its existence.
This seems little more than word play to me. What tips this off to me is that some mathematics only work in certain geometries. Pythagorean theorem to spacetime vectors jumps immediately to mind, since I just finished reading a book involving such math. You say that pi is the same for all eternity, but you don't support this claim with any reasoning. I think this is an a priori assumption of yours that you haven't explored. If I'm wrong and you can provide me some literature, please do. Like I said, the philosophy of mathematics is intriguing to me.
From Wikipedia:
Quote:
Logic concerns the structure of statements and arguments, in formal systems of inference and natural language. Topics include validity, fallacies and paradoxes, reasoning using provability and arguments involving causality and time.
Logic such as sufficiency versus necessity is dependent upon time as a component of it's reference. Since this logic refers to a process which requires time, the validity of logic is dependent upon the process always obeying it's rules. If the process becomes disobedient(if we stop time), logic then no longer applies, since it will no longer refer to something true. If logic no longer applies without time, then it is not eternal. But we don't have to stop here. The dependence of logic upon time applies to some logic, yet there are forms of logic that do not depend upon time, such as the logic of identity(A=A). However, there is a problem with applying this to real instances. If you want to say that the A pebble is pebble A(the same pebble), you must specify when you're talking about. The atomic structure of the pebble necessarily changes with time. To talk of the pebble as it is within a single instance is to refer to something we have no experience of. The pebble could at the same time be a pebble A and not pebble A, according to Quantum Physics. How you would apply the law of contradiction to quantum particles in states of superposition?
It becomes increasingly clear that logic follows from the semantics of our language. It is a system of understanding, in the same way that Plato's forms are.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
You say that pi is the same for all eternity, but you don't support this claim with any reasoning.
We cannot conceive a real space in which pi does not apply. Pi is part of the structure of space, in so far as circles exist. Pi is an eternal logical condition for the existence of circles.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
We cannot conceive a real space in which pi does not apply.
Pi's relationship to a circle is analytic; within the definition of a perfect circle. When you conceptualize an abstract perfect circle, Pi is necessarily part of the definition. This does not make Pi any more eternal than a perfect circle. Also, to say that we can't conceive of a real space in which Pi does not apply does not mean there isn't one. Pythagoras theorem as a relationship to a triangle was discovered to not apply to some geometries.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
I ran across this while browsing (Perhaps Neitszche was on to something):
Quote:
Another popular spin on this fallacy involves referencing the so-called laws of logic and suggesting that these "laws" have to be dictated by somebody or something, ergo God exists. In reality, there are no "laws of logic". Logic is a name given to describe the function of how your brain processes information. Your stomach's function involves digestion. Is there a "law of digestion?" No. Another intellectually bankrupt semantical run-around.
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
We cannot conceive a real space in which pi does not apply.
Pi's relationship to a circle is analytic; within the definition of a perfect circle. When you conceptualize an abstract perfect circle, Pi is necessarily part of the definition. This does not make Pi any more eternal than a perfect circle. Also, to say that we can't conceive of a real space in which Pi does not apply does not mean there isn't one. Pythagoras theorem as a relationship to a triangle was discovered to not apply to some geometries.
Pi is equally eternal as a perfect circle. Both, like all mathematical concepts, are outside time. The hypothetical existence of a space in which Pi does not apply is not really relevant to actual mathematics.
Interbane wrote:
I ran across this while browsing (Perhaps Neitszche was on to something):
Quote:
Another popular spin on this fallacy involves referencing the so-called laws of logic and suggesting that these "laws" have to be dictated by somebody or something, ergo God exists. In reality, there are no "laws of logic". Logic is a name given to describe the function of how your brain processes information. Your stomach's function involves digestion. Is there a "law of digestion?" No. Another intellectually bankrupt semantical run-around.
This argument is weak. Logic is not a 'brain process' but how that brain process links to the external reality. For example Jupiter is five times as far as the earth from the sun. This is a material relation between Jupiter and the earth which is independent of human cognition.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
The hypothetical existence of a space in which Pi does not apply is not really relevant to actual mathematics.
Why not?
Quote:
Logic is not a 'brain process' but how that brain process links to the external reality.
Wouldn't it be better to say that logic is a brain process, and also links to the real world? I've come to disagree with this understanding after doing some studying. It seems logic is a tool we have for understanding the world, and there is no such thing as an objective instance of logic. For every web site I've found, they all state logic as the study of principles of correct reasoning.
Quote:
For example Jupiter is five times as far as the earth from the sun. This is a material relation between Jupiter and the earth which is independent of human cognition.
I understand, but how do you go from this instance to the abstraction of whatever math you've gained from it being eternal?
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 3013 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 760 Thanked: 756 times in 567 posts
Gender: Country:
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
The hypothetical existence of a space in which Pi does not apply is not really relevant to actual mathematics.
Why not?
We are trying to understand reality. The beauty of the mathematics in The Selfish Gene is that it shows how intrinsically number is integrated into evolutionary reality. I am extending this principle (per the Platonic axiom that number is discovered not created by thought) to say perfect circles are real concepts, with clear application to the world. A hypothetical alternative universe in which Pi does not apply is not real.
Quote:
Quote:
Logic is not a 'brain process' but how that brain process links to the external reality.
Wouldn't it be better to say that logic is a brain process, and also links to the real world? I've come to disagree with this understanding after doing some studying. It seems logic is a tool we have for understanding the world, and there is no such thing as an objective instance of logic. For every web site I've found, they all state logic as the study of principles of correct reasoning.
The 'correct reasoning' definition of logic has been questioned, for example in Heidegger's definition of truth as disclosure rather than representation. Of course there is objective logic. We use it to say, for example, that Jupiter is five times as far as the earth from the sun.
Quote:
Quote:
For example Jupiter is five times as far as the earth from the sun. This is a material relation between Jupiter and the earth which is independent of human cognition.
I understand, but how do you go from this instance to the abstraction of whatever math you've gained from it being eternal?
The number five is embedded in this relation. This number only has ideal existence as concept, but would equally apply in a successor universe in which one thing was five times as big as another.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 3676 Images: 3 Location: California Highscores:1 Thanks: 345 Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Country:
Quote:
The number five is embedded in this relation. This number only has ideal existence as concept, but would equally apply in a successor universe in which one thing was five times as big as another.
The number isn't embedded. We make a neural connection. Orbits are elliptical and Jupiter will most likely never be exactly 5 times as far from the sun as the Earth is. Even if it every happens to be within an inch or two of that exact length at any point in time, that will not be the case for every spacetime vector.
Quote:
I am extending this principle (per the Platonic axiom that number is discovered not created by thought) to say perfect circles are real concepts, with clear application to the world. A hypothetical alternative universe in which Pi does not apply is not real.
Show me an instance of a perfect circle. You can't, because there is no such thing. The concept as an abstraction of the category circular is able to be combined with the concept "perfect" in our heads. Just because we can imagine such a thing doesn't make this abstraction real. It's a method of understanding, a necessary neural segway into making sense of reality.
What is still a grey area for me is why nature obeys mathematical rules. Why does math necessarily apply? These processes and relationships are different than the idealist category of geometric shapes, so if you have insight in this area that is how you'll get through to me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
The 12th Disciple is now being
stocked at Poor Richard's
Bookstore in Colorado Springs.
We're happy to have the
title at such a historic
location in Colorado Springs.
If… more
For most of us, a very big
part of our lives will be a
dark place, we wont realize
it. We live, we eat, we have
some fun, we go to school, we
sleep. But it will come the
time, when… more
The 12th Disciple's
endorsement for a Presidential
Candidate...we'll pass.
If many haven't learned
over the past several decades,
centuries, and millennia, the
gover… more
So I've been looking for
new books to read, but I
haven't found any that
have caught my attention
lately. I want to try and
venture out into a different
genre, but I'… more
For those who constantly gripe
about jobs being sent
overseas, focus your anger on
this. Read about how one of
the most profitable companies
prided by American citizens
offshores t… more
Its January 1945 and British,
Commonwealth, US and POWs from
various other nationalities
are finally awaiting
liberation from the various
camps in Eastern Europe, where
some of the… more
A good friend of mine recently
received a pre-paid credit
card. She went to pay for a
$20.00 gas purchase only to
later find out that over a
$70.00 hold was placed on her
card for… more
While watching the bube tube
(TV) this morning I stumbled
on a motivational speaker
saying “today marks a new
year, you now have a blank
canvas to work from.”
The 12th Disciple wishes you
and yours a Happy New Year.
Many of us hope and pray that
2012 will bring better
leadership in the government
of the United States, better
leadership i… more
The Cat & The
Nightingale Saga, the docu
drama version of The Weekend
Trippers, also tells Rifleman
Ted TaylorÂ’s story but in a
slightly different way. It too
tells of the… more
In 2011 I published my book;
in the book I outlined 9 Key
Principles to Prosperity
(happiness). Like
many of you, I walked through
2011 with the Woe is me
attitude. When… more
More and more these days I see
people using social media to
quote what someone else has
said. I see people posting
their favorite rappers lyrics,
lines from movies and what
seems t… more
IÂ’m down the school for the
first time today. My friend
visited two weeks ago and said
it was chaos. They must have
heard I was back
because everything is tidy and
orderly today… more
I'm quite positive that
everyone who enters this site
has the same thing in mind:
fear of seeing a world without
books, without literature. We
see it everyday, more people
qui… more
For once in my life I step off
the plane at Banjul, and
donÂ’t get a rush of elation.
I went home to see my
daughterÂ’s twins safely
delivered. They are all well
now, but IÂ’m goin… more
Last weekend I witnessed a
couple of family members
literally fall apart at the
seams because of a problem
with a couple of their
employees. They recently
opened a group home, and
… more
Tell your friends when to meet you in the BookTalk.org Chat Room.
Booktalk.org on Facebook
If you enjoy business bestsellers and would like to expand your business knowledge check out the quality book summaries offered by the world's leading book summary company.
BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.
Tweet This Topic
