| BookTalk.org News |
| • We need FICTION suggestions right away so we can put the fiction poll up in the next few days. We're deciding on our Feb. & March 2009 FICTION book. Enter the Fiction Suggestion forum to suggest a book or two ONLY if you will actually participate. |
| • Regular casual chats are back on the menu! Check out the calendar for the schedule. |
| Show us where you live! |
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Chris OConnor 
Rhodes Scholar
BookTalk.org Owner
Usergroups: None
Joined: 05 May 2002
Posts: 7346
Thanks
Given: 53
Received: 20 in 16 Posts
Gender: 
Location: Florida
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy1952
Doctorate
Bronze Contributor
Usergroups: None
Joined: 27 Oct 2002
Posts: 583
Thanks
Given: 0
Received: 0 in 0 Posts
Gender:
Location: Saint Louis
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 1:36 pm Post subject: AGNOSTICISM. BY PROF. THOMAS H. HUXLEY
|
 |
|
Yesterday I read the abridged T. Huxley, Agnosticism in Joshi. I found this fabulous essay so inspiring that I located and read the complete text -- Agnosticism (Unabridged) It turns out, I may be an agnostic after all! As Huxley explains it, agnosticism is a general tool, a methodology, not necessarily a point of view on the god thingy. I have railed against agnosticism, on the wrong impression that it involves “special pleading” for the god fantasy: “One cannot know whether there is or is not a god”; to which Jeremy self-righteously answers, “but why pick that unlikely, implausible human construct to be ‘agnostic’ about?”
What Huxley is actually proposing is that all the myriad things that we don’t know or can’t know, we simply leave as unknown. His argument (as I understand it) isn’t that, “I don’t know if there is a god or not, and neither do you”, but rather that religion does not answer the questions which it claims to answer. “God created the universe” “You don’t know how the universe came to be, and neither do I; however your specific hypothesis, that there is a god and that it created something, is implausible to the extent that I reject it”
So – If I now understand correctly – one can be an agnostic atheist; agnostic is the method, and atheist is where it took you.
Huxley sprinkles the text with Latin phrases. Although their translation is not really necessary, I did come up with this handy tool for anyone who wants to know exactly what is being said (and who doesn’t speak Latin, obviously!) www.quicklatin.com/ Edited by: Jeremy1952 at: 3/5/03 12:44:09 pm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|
at: 10/30/05 4:43 pm
