| BookTalk.org News |
| • A new forum has been created exclusively for discussing poetry! |
| • We now have a VIDEOS page featuring videos of our authors giving lectures, talks, interviews or engaged in debates. You'll find the link in the top green navigation bar. |
| • Guy P. Harrison, author of "50 reasons people give for believing in a god," has accepted our invitation to either a live chat session or an email interview! |
| Featured Videos |
Jodi Picoult
"My Sister's Keeper"

Robert Burton
"On Being Certain"

More Videos
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
| Donate & Support BookTalk.org |
Please support our free community by making a credit card donation through our secure PayPal account. We appreciate and depend on the generosity of our members. Thank you!
•
See who supports us
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Niall001  Stupendously Brilliant
Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 770
Gender: 
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 4:56 am Post subject: Big Balls
|
|
|
Ridley points out that female polygamy is more common in species where males have larger testicles.
Does anyone have any ideas as to why this is the case? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PeterDF  Freshman
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 214
Gender: 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Niall001  Stupendously Brilliant
Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 770
Gender: 
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 2:25 pm Post subject: true
|
|
|
Yes, but there are alternatives, aren't there?
Perhaps females are humping 20 males in these species because it leads to less conflict within the groups. If males have larger testicles then they probably have higher sex drives. If all members of the group are satisfied, then there is less conflict.
I'm just wondering which is the cause and which is the effect. Its all to easy to confuse the two.
As an alternative, it is possible that males have bigger testicles because in such species, there are more chances to reproduce.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PeterDF  Freshman
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 214
Gender: 
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:01 pm Post subject: Re: true
|
|
|
I think the correlation between testicle size and promiscuity is probably due to the simple "selfish gene" explanation, but I agree that sex can play an important part in social cohesion. This is especially important in bonobos of course. (Where humans might shake hands - bonobos have sex.)
The reason that chimp behaviour is so different to gorilla behaviour is probably because of the food they eat. Gorillas eat large volumes of food of relatively low nutritional value like roots and tubers, so they can afford to be slow moving and they can live in small inoffensive family groups wandering around to find what food they can.
Chimps often share the same parts of the forest with gorillas but they eat small amounts of high value food like fruit, and they occasionally hunt meat, so they have to be quick and clever to make sure they get the best of the food. They live in bigger more flexible groups that are more competitive. The males have to hunt co-operatively so it follows that they live in mixed fission/fusion groups within larger communities - hence the promiscuity.
Bonobos live in areas where there are no gorillas so they can find both kinds of food. So, it is thought that, because they don't need to compete for food in such a competitive way, that this is the reason that they are much more gentle and inoffensive than chimps.
This seems to be the theory. Makes sense to me anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|