| BookTalk.org News |
| • If you are having trouble with logging into your account or making posts please know that we are working to resolve this issue. Please delete your temporary Internet files and cookies (at least those for our site) and stay tuned to see if that resolves the issue. If not our web designer believes he can find the code that is causing the issue. |
| Show us where you live! |
 |
| Donate & Support BookTalk.org |
Please support our free community by making a credit card donation through our secure PayPal account. We appreciate and depend on the generosity of our members. Thank you!
•
See who supports us
|
|
| Author |
Message |
irishrosem  Doctorate
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 536
Gender: 

|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:12 pm Post subject: Article on the Wall of Separation
|
|
|
On his website, booktalk member George Ricker wrote an article that I thought would be relevant to this discussion. In “Finding the line…Rebuilding the Wall of Separation,” Ricker is careful to focus on issues he feels are “required to protect the fundamental rights” of U.S. citizens, answering three questions pertinent to such a discussion:
Quote: 1. What is the fundamental nature of the relationship between our government and its citizens? 2. What protections are necessary to preserve our basic rights as citizens in a free society? 3. Why is separation between government and religions a necessary ingredient of those protections?
After a brief history, Ricker outlines the threat of allowing, as he terms it, “state-sanctioned orthodoxy”:
Quote: When we allow, with a wink and a nod, the state to advance the cause of a particular orthodoxy or to express a preference for one set of opinions over another, we have substantially removed that protection. And when we allow that protection to be removed for any individual, we endanger the liberty of all.
Later, after illustrating the “traditional” uses of God on buildings, currency and in sayings, and noting that Americans do not worship the same god and some do not worship any god at all, Ricker asks a pointed question:
Quote: How then can a government agency, which has an obligation to treat all American citizens as equals before the law, express a preference for the “God” worshipped by some Americans? What business does a government agency have making any religious declarations at all?
Ricker also makes a comically salient point when he notes that many of the “traditional” uses of god, which apologists defend, only found their way into government settings in the latter half of the 20th century. “Indeed a decent respect for the tradition of our Constitution ought to lead to their elimination, not their continuance.”
This is just one article on a website replete with useful and engaging writing. I often wonder why Ricker does not link more of his stuff to booktalk, as it is sometimes very topical to the conversation. I think perhaps he is wary of overstepping by flooding the forum with his articles, but I think his work can be very constructive.
I’m curious, George, if you had already been working on this article, or if our discussion on the forum prompted you to write it. I think that over the next few decades the courts, obviously, will be instrumental in securing or endangering the separation the founding fathers desired. I think it essential that we draw attention to these decisions and their results; an article like this could go a long way in awareness efforts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
George Ricker  Junior Gold Contributor


Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 314
Gender: 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
irishrosem  Doctorate
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 536
Gender: 

|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:39 pm Post subject: Re: Article on the Wall of Separation
|
|
|
Garicker: ...expand the theme of equal justice before the law as a critical element in these considerations...
I think you note a critical parallel to establishment issues, that often isn't explicit.
Thanks for the write-up...
My pleasure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|